Electronic health records and data exchange in the WHO European region: A subregional analysis of achievements, challenges, and prospects

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105687
Roberto Tornero Costa , Keyrellous Adib , Nagui Salama , Stefania Davia , Antonio Martínez Millana , Vicente Traver , Karapet Davtyan
{"title":"Electronic health records and data exchange in the WHO European region: A subregional analysis of achievements, challenges, and prospects","authors":"Roberto Tornero Costa ,&nbsp;Keyrellous Adib ,&nbsp;Nagui Salama ,&nbsp;Stefania Davia ,&nbsp;Antonio Martínez Millana ,&nbsp;Vicente Traver ,&nbsp;Karapet Davtyan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electronic health record (EHR) systems are powerful tools that enhance healthcare quality. They improve efficiency, enable data exchange, and ensure authorized access to patient information. In 2022, the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO EURO) conducted a survey to assess the digital health capabilities of the 53 Member States. This article provides a sub-regional analysis of the status of EHR systems and major barriers to their implementation, their readiness for information sharing, and the access and re-use of EHR data.</div><div>Generally, EHR implementation and national data exchange are at an advanced stage in the region, though achievements and challenges vary across subregions. While more Member States in the Eastern, Western, and Southern Europe subregions reported having centralized national EHR systems, the situation is more diverse in Northern Europe and the Asian subregions, where both centralized and decentralized EHR systems are in use. Significant barriers to EHR implementation, including funding, technical capacity, competing priorities, and lack of interoperability standards are frequently cited, while others like demand, knowledge or acceptance challenges are not reported as significant. Significant barriers were reported the most by the Central Asia subregion, while barriers had least significance in Western Europe. Five out of the six subregions reported a wide adoption of national strategies and have dedicated agencies to ensure interoperability and secure data exchange. However, only 29 Member States have established legal requirements for healthcare providers to adopt EHR systems that conform to national standards for both clinical terminology and electronic messaging, with this being most notable in Western, Eastern, and Northern Europe, and the lowest percentage of Member States in Central Asia. All Member States of the six sub regions have passed privacy and data protection legislation. The use of EHR data is widely regulated, with only five remaining Member States of WHO Europe to develop EHR legislation distributed across subregions (Southern Europe, Western and Central Asia).</div><div>Looking ahead, Member States are encouraged to define national legislation governing EHR systems and their use, while ensuring the interconnectivity of the local and regional EHR systems. Sustainable funding should be allocated to the development and maintenance of these systems. Efforts should also focus on creating comprehensive roadmaps for the full implementation of health data standards, addressing interoperability at local and regional levels, and developing quality management systems for testing and certification. Additionally, monitoring and evaluation should be conducted to assess whether EHRs are contributing to national health objectives. Finally, engaging patients and intersectoral partners will be key to developing a more patient-centered approach, ensuring that EHR systems meet patient needs and expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 105687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) systems are powerful tools that enhance healthcare quality. They improve efficiency, enable data exchange, and ensure authorized access to patient information. In 2022, the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO EURO) conducted a survey to assess the digital health capabilities of the 53 Member States. This article provides a sub-regional analysis of the status of EHR systems and major barriers to their implementation, their readiness for information sharing, and the access and re-use of EHR data.
Generally, EHR implementation and national data exchange are at an advanced stage in the region, though achievements and challenges vary across subregions. While more Member States in the Eastern, Western, and Southern Europe subregions reported having centralized national EHR systems, the situation is more diverse in Northern Europe and the Asian subregions, where both centralized and decentralized EHR systems are in use. Significant barriers to EHR implementation, including funding, technical capacity, competing priorities, and lack of interoperability standards are frequently cited, while others like demand, knowledge or acceptance challenges are not reported as significant. Significant barriers were reported the most by the Central Asia subregion, while barriers had least significance in Western Europe. Five out of the six subregions reported a wide adoption of national strategies and have dedicated agencies to ensure interoperability and secure data exchange. However, only 29 Member States have established legal requirements for healthcare providers to adopt EHR systems that conform to national standards for both clinical terminology and electronic messaging, with this being most notable in Western, Eastern, and Northern Europe, and the lowest percentage of Member States in Central Asia. All Member States of the six sub regions have passed privacy and data protection legislation. The use of EHR data is widely regulated, with only five remaining Member States of WHO Europe to develop EHR legislation distributed across subregions (Southern Europe, Western and Central Asia).
Looking ahead, Member States are encouraged to define national legislation governing EHR systems and their use, while ensuring the interconnectivity of the local and regional EHR systems. Sustainable funding should be allocated to the development and maintenance of these systems. Efforts should also focus on creating comprehensive roadmaps for the full implementation of health data standards, addressing interoperability at local and regional levels, and developing quality management systems for testing and certification. Additionally, monitoring and evaluation should be conducted to assess whether EHRs are contributing to national health objectives. Finally, engaging patients and intersectoral partners will be key to developing a more patient-centered approach, ensuring that EHR systems meet patient needs and expectations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世卫组织欧洲地区的电子病历和数据交换:对成就、挑战和前景的次区域分析
电子病历(EHR)系统是提高医疗质量的强大工具。它们提高了效率,实现了数据交换,并确保对患者信息的授权访问。2022 年,世界卫生组织欧洲区域办事处(WHO EURO)开展了一项调查,以评估 53 个成员国的数字医疗能力。本文对电子健康记录系统的现状及其实施的主要障碍、其信息共享的准备情况以及电子健康记录数据的获取和再利用进行了次区域分析。总体而言,该区域的电子健康记录实施和国家数据交换处于高级阶段,但各次区域的成就和挑战各不相同。东欧、西欧和南欧次区域有更多的会员国报告拥有集中式国家电子健康记录系统,而北欧和亚洲次区域的情况则更为多样,集中式和分散式电子健康记录系统都在使用。实施电子健康记录系统的重大障碍,包括资金、技术能力、相互竞争的优先事项和缺乏互操作性标准等,经常被提及,而其他障碍,如需求、知识或接受方面的挑战,则没有被报告为重大障碍。中亚次区域报告的重大障碍最多,而西欧次区域报告的障碍最少。在六个次区域中,有五个次区域报告广泛采用了国家战略,并设立了专门机构来确保互操作性和安全的数据交换。然而,只有 29 个会员国制定了法律规定,要求医疗服务提供者采用符合国家临床术语和电子信息标准的电子病历系统,这在西欧、东欧和北欧最为明显,而中亚的会员国比例最低。六个分地区的所有会员国都通过了隐私和数据保护立法。电子健康记录数据的使用受到广泛监管,世卫组织欧洲分区域(南欧、西亚和中亚)仅剩五个会员国制定了电子健康记录立法。展望未来,鼓励会员国制定管理电子健康记录系统及其使用的国家立法,同时确保地方和区域电子健康记录系统的互联互通。应为这些系统的开发和维护划拨可持续的资金。还应重点制定全面实施健康数据标准的综合路线图,解决地方和区域一级的互操作性问题,并开发用于测试和认证的质量管理系统。此外,应开展监测和评估,以评估电子健康记录是否有助于实现国家健康目标。最后,让患者和跨部门合作伙伴参与进来,将是制定更加以患者为中心的方法,确保电子健康记录系统满足患者需求和期望的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of missing data in electronic health records of people with diabetes in primary care in Spain: A population-based cohort study Systematic construction of composite radiation therapy dataset using automated data pipeline for prognosis prediction Perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients with cardiovascular diseases on mHealth lifestyle apps: A qualitative study Smart data-driven medical decisions through collective and individual anomaly detection in healthcare time series An interpretable machine learning scoring tool for estimating time to recurrence readmissions in stroke patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1