The dilemma and resolution of data circulation in China: Is data as consideration the solution?

IF 3.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Computer Law & Security Review Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106074
Xueting Fu
{"title":"The dilemma and resolution of data circulation in China: Is data as consideration the solution?","authors":"Xueting Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The circulation of data presents a significant challenge to the development of China's digital economy. On data exchanges, trading activity has declined. Off-exchange, stringent barriers between data-sharing consortia have resulted in data silos, producing crises of trust and legitimacy. Treating personal data as consideration, by incentivising individuals' motivation to share data through both financial gain and the protection of their personal rights, can establish a robust and comprehensive legal basis for extensive commercial data processing. Accordingly, this connects primary and secondary data element markets, facilitates data circulation, and strengthens the real economy. In the legal framework of personal data as consideration, the agreement between users and enterprises constitutes a bilateral contract, wherein individuals are obliged to \"provide personal data and/ or authorise processing\" as counter-performance. Through this exchange, enterprises, predicated on user authorisation, can secure one or more rights to hold, use or operate the data, thereby achieving a separation of data property rights. The data property rights enterprises acquire are governed by the principle of registration confrontation. The data subject's inheritors, prior or subsequent parties in transactions, and infringers are all third parties that could be confronted absolutely, while a subsequent licensee's ability to confront a prior licensee hinges on whether the pre-existing data property rights have been registered. Even when data property rights derive from a non-exclusive licence, the enterprise can still confront the bankruptcy administrator and proceed with data processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 106074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The circulation of data presents a significant challenge to the development of China's digital economy. On data exchanges, trading activity has declined. Off-exchange, stringent barriers between data-sharing consortia have resulted in data silos, producing crises of trust and legitimacy. Treating personal data as consideration, by incentivising individuals' motivation to share data through both financial gain and the protection of their personal rights, can establish a robust and comprehensive legal basis for extensive commercial data processing. Accordingly, this connects primary and secondary data element markets, facilitates data circulation, and strengthens the real economy. In the legal framework of personal data as consideration, the agreement between users and enterprises constitutes a bilateral contract, wherein individuals are obliged to "provide personal data and/ or authorise processing" as counter-performance. Through this exchange, enterprises, predicated on user authorisation, can secure one or more rights to hold, use or operate the data, thereby achieving a separation of data property rights. The data property rights enterprises acquire are governed by the principle of registration confrontation. The data subject's inheritors, prior or subsequent parties in transactions, and infringers are all third parties that could be confronted absolutely, while a subsequent licensee's ability to confront a prior licensee hinges on whether the pre-existing data property rights have been registered. Even when data property rights derive from a non-exclusive licence, the enterprise can still confront the bankruptcy administrator and proceed with data processing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国数据流通的困境与解决之道:数据作为考量是否是解决之道?
数据流通给中国数字经济的发展带来了巨大挑战。在数据交易所,交易活动减少。在交易所之外,数据共享联盟之间的严格壁垒造成了数据孤岛,产生了信任危机和合法性危机。将个人数据视为对价,通过经济收益和保护个人权利来激励个人分享数据,可以为广泛的商业数据处理建立健全而全面的法律基础。相应地,这将连接一级和二级数据要素市场,促进数据流通,加强实体经济。在以个人数据为对价的法律框架下,用户与企业之间的协议构成双边合同,个人有义务 "提供个人数据并/或授权处理 "作为反履行。通过这种交换,企业在用户授权的前提下,可以获得一项或多项持有、使用或操作数据的权利,从而实现数据产权的分离。企业获得的数据产权受登记对抗原则的制约。数据主体的继承人、交易中的在先或在后当事人以及侵权人都是可以绝对对抗的第三方,而在后被许可人能否对抗在先被许可人则取决于在先数据产权是否已经登记。即使数据产权来自非排他性许可,企业仍可对抗破产管理人并继续进行数据处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
期刊最新文献
Automated vehicles, the ‘driver dilemma’, stopping powers, and paradigms of regulating road traffic The dilemma and resolution of data circulation in China: Is data as consideration the solution? Cross-border data flow in China: Shifting from restriction to relaxation? The emergence of EU cybersecurity law: A tale of lemons, angst, turf, surf and grey boxes Illegal loot box advertising on social media? An empirical study using the Meta and TikTok ad transparency repositories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1