Abdallah E. Abdallah , Hazem Elkady , Alaa Elwan , Mahmoud Rashed , Ali Hammad , Mohamed A. Elkady , Elsayed G.E. Elsakka , Mohamed S. Alesawy
{"title":"New vatalanib analogs: Design, synthesis, in silico study and biological evaluation for anticancer activity","authors":"Abdallah E. Abdallah , Hazem Elkady , Alaa Elwan , Mahmoud Rashed , Ali Hammad , Mohamed A. Elkady , Elsayed G.E. Elsakka , Mohamed S. Alesawy","doi":"10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.140595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In our attempts to improve pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics characters of vatalanib, four strategies of the drug design were applied to design and synthesis new quinoxaline based vatalanib analogs. Antiproliferative activities of the synthesized compounds were investigated against two tumor cell lines (HepG2 and HCT‐116) using vatalanib as a positive control. The new candidates showed promising anticancer activity against two tested cancer cell lines with IC<sub>50</sub> values ranging from 6.04 ± 0.19 to 100.15 ± 3.26 µM, in particular compounds <strong>11b</strong> and <strong>11c</strong> which were more potent than vatalanib. The most potent was the 4-benzoylquinoxaline derivative <strong>11b (</strong>IC<sub>50</sub> = 6.04 ± 0.19 µM and 15.58 ± 0.58 µM) compared to vatalanib (IC<sub>50</sub> of 25.27 ± 0.84 µM and 43.91 ± 1.64 µM) against HepG2 and HCT116, respectively. The selectivity indices of <strong>11b</strong> were found to be approximately 14 and 5 towards HepG2 and HCT116, respectively. While vatalanib showed selectivity indices of about 5 and 3 towards HepG2 and HCT116, respectively. The most promising compound <strong>11b</strong> was further investigated in HepG‐2 cells for its apoptotic effect, cell cycle arrest and in vitro VEGFR-2 inhibitory activity as the main mechanisms of cell death. It was found that <strong>11b</strong> can induce apoptosis and arrest the cell cycle at the at G1 phase in addition to, compound <strong>11b</strong> showed effective inhibition of VEGFR-2 with IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.918 ± 0.033 µM compared to vatalanib (IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.265 ± 0.009 µM). Deep computational studies were created for the designed compounds including molecular docking, physicochemical properties, profiling pharmacokinetics, ADMET studies, and toxicity predictions to evaluate the prospective drug candidates. The results of the docking study were consistent with biological testing, furthermore, <em>in silico</em> ADMET study revealed the superior pharmacokinetics characters of the new candidates over vatalanib. So, the current work suggests that the 4-benzoylquinoxaline-1-yl-acetamide derivatives, especially <strong>11b,</strong> can serve as lead molecules for development of new effective anticancer drugs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Structure","volume":"1322 ","pages":"Article 140595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Structure","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002228602403103X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In our attempts to improve pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics characters of vatalanib, four strategies of the drug design were applied to design and synthesis new quinoxaline based vatalanib analogs. Antiproliferative activities of the synthesized compounds were investigated against two tumor cell lines (HepG2 and HCT‐116) using vatalanib as a positive control. The new candidates showed promising anticancer activity against two tested cancer cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 6.04 ± 0.19 to 100.15 ± 3.26 µM, in particular compounds 11b and 11c which were more potent than vatalanib. The most potent was the 4-benzoylquinoxaline derivative 11b (IC50 = 6.04 ± 0.19 µM and 15.58 ± 0.58 µM) compared to vatalanib (IC50 of 25.27 ± 0.84 µM and 43.91 ± 1.64 µM) against HepG2 and HCT116, respectively. The selectivity indices of 11b were found to be approximately 14 and 5 towards HepG2 and HCT116, respectively. While vatalanib showed selectivity indices of about 5 and 3 towards HepG2 and HCT116, respectively. The most promising compound 11b was further investigated in HepG‐2 cells for its apoptotic effect, cell cycle arrest and in vitro VEGFR-2 inhibitory activity as the main mechanisms of cell death. It was found that 11b can induce apoptosis and arrest the cell cycle at the at G1 phase in addition to, compound 11b showed effective inhibition of VEGFR-2 with IC50 of 0.918 ± 0.033 µM compared to vatalanib (IC50 of 0.265 ± 0.009 µM). Deep computational studies were created for the designed compounds including molecular docking, physicochemical properties, profiling pharmacokinetics, ADMET studies, and toxicity predictions to evaluate the prospective drug candidates. The results of the docking study were consistent with biological testing, furthermore, in silico ADMET study revealed the superior pharmacokinetics characters of the new candidates over vatalanib. So, the current work suggests that the 4-benzoylquinoxaline-1-yl-acetamide derivatives, especially 11b, can serve as lead molecules for development of new effective anticancer drugs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Structure is dedicated to the publication of full-length articles and review papers, providing important new structural information on all types of chemical species including:
• Stable and unstable molecules in all types of environments (vapour, molecular beam, liquid, solution, liquid crystal, solid state, matrix-isolated, surface-absorbed etc.)
• Chemical intermediates
• Molecules in excited states
• Biological molecules
• Polymers.
The methods used may include any combination of spectroscopic and non-spectroscopic techniques, for example:
• Infrared spectroscopy (mid, far, near)
• Raman spectroscopy and non-linear Raman methods (CARS, etc.)
• Electronic absorption spectroscopy
• Optical rotatory dispersion and circular dichroism
• Fluorescence and phosphorescence techniques
• Electron spectroscopies (PES, XPS), EXAFS, etc.
• Microwave spectroscopy
• Electron diffraction
• NMR and ESR spectroscopies
• Mössbauer spectroscopy
• X-ray crystallography
• Charge Density Analyses
• Computational Studies (supplementing experimental methods)
We encourage publications combining theoretical and experimental approaches. The structural insights gained by the studies should be correlated with the properties, activity and/ or reactivity of the molecule under investigation and the relevance of this molecule and its implications should be discussed.