Rates of Opportunistic Salpingectomy During Minimally-Invasive Benign Hysterectomy By Race/Ethnicity from 2016 to 2021

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.127
AS Farrell , N Posever , E Gagliardi , AM Modest
{"title":"Rates of Opportunistic Salpingectomy During Minimally-Invasive Benign Hysterectomy By Race/Ethnicity from 2016 to 2021","authors":"AS Farrell ,&nbsp;N Posever ,&nbsp;E Gagliardi ,&nbsp;AM Modest","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>The Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommends opportunistic salpingectomy during benign hysterectomy to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancers. A previous study indicated racial discrepancies in the adoption rates of risk-reducing salpingectomies at time of hysterectomy from 2011-2018. We performed an updated analysis to determine if these differences persist.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Over 700 academic and community hospitals in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>Patients 18-50 years old undergoing minimally invasive benign hysterectomy from 2016-2021.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Billing codes were used to identify patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), with or without bilateral salpingectomy. Patients were identified in the dataset as Non-Hispanic White (NHW), Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), or Hispanic. Log-binomial regression was used to calculate risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of salpingectomy for NHB, and Hispanic patients compared to NHW patients.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>Of 117,587 patients, 65% were NHW, 17.1% NHB, and 17.8% Hispanic. Of these patients, 70.6% underwent TLH, 12.8% TVH, and 16.6% LAVH. 86.9% of all patients underwent salpingectomy. When compared to NHW patients undergoing TLH, NHB and Hispanic patients were as likely to undergo salpingectomy [NHB RR 0.98 (CI 0.97-0.98); Hispanic RR 0.99 (CI 0.99-0.999)]. The same was true for patients undergoing TVH [NHB RR 1.04 (CI 0.997-1.1); Hispanic RR 1.1 (CI 1.1-1.2)] and LAVH [NHB RR 0.95 (CI 0.93-0.97); Hispanic 0.997 (CI 0.98-1.01)]. RRs remained similar after adjusting for age, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and year of operation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest minimal differences in salpingectomy rates among racial and ethnic groups between 2016-2021. This is a change from prior studies and may indicate national improvements in reducing health disparities associated with opportunistic salpingectomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"31 11","pages":"Pages S31-S32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024005351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objective

The Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommends opportunistic salpingectomy during benign hysterectomy to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancers. A previous study indicated racial discrepancies in the adoption rates of risk-reducing salpingectomies at time of hysterectomy from 2011-2018. We performed an updated analysis to determine if these differences persist.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Over 700 academic and community hospitals in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Patients or Participants

Patients 18-50 years old undergoing minimally invasive benign hysterectomy from 2016-2021.

Interventions

Billing codes were used to identify patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), with or without bilateral salpingectomy. Patients were identified in the dataset as Non-Hispanic White (NHW), Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), or Hispanic. Log-binomial regression was used to calculate risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of salpingectomy for NHB, and Hispanic patients compared to NHW patients.

Measurements and Main Results

Of 117,587 patients, 65% were NHW, 17.1% NHB, and 17.8% Hispanic. Of these patients, 70.6% underwent TLH, 12.8% TVH, and 16.6% LAVH. 86.9% of all patients underwent salpingectomy. When compared to NHW patients undergoing TLH, NHB and Hispanic patients were as likely to undergo salpingectomy [NHB RR 0.98 (CI 0.97-0.98); Hispanic RR 0.99 (CI 0.99-0.999)]. The same was true for patients undergoing TVH [NHB RR 1.04 (CI 0.997-1.1); Hispanic RR 1.1 (CI 1.1-1.2)] and LAVH [NHB RR 0.95 (CI 0.93-0.97); Hispanic 0.997 (CI 0.98-1.01)]. RRs remained similar after adjusting for age, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and year of operation.

Conclusion

These findings suggest minimal differences in salpingectomy rates among racial and ethnic groups between 2016-2021. This is a change from prior studies and may indicate national improvements in reducing health disparities associated with opportunistic salpingectomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016 年至 2021 年按种族/族裔分列的微创良性子宫切除术中机会性输卵管切除术的比率
研究目的妇科肿瘤学会建议在良性子宫切除术中进行机会性输卵管切除术,以降低上皮性卵巢癌的风险。之前的一项研究表明,2011-2018年期间,在子宫切除术时采用降低风险的输卵管切除术的比例存在种族差异。我们进行了一项最新分析,以确定这些差异是否持续存在。设计回顾性队列研究。设置美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划的 700 多家学术和社区医院。患者或参与者2016-2021年期间接受微创良性子宫切除术的18-50岁患者.干预措施使用账单代码识别接受全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)、全阴道子宫切除术(TVH)或腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术(LAVH)的患者,无论是否接受双侧输卵管切除术。患者在数据集中被识别为非西班牙裔白人(NHW)、非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)或西班牙裔。采用对数二项式回归法计算非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔患者与非西班牙裔白人患者相比行输卵管切除术的风险比 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。在这些患者中,70.6%接受了TLH,12.8%接受了TVH,16.6%接受了LAVH。86.9%的患者接受了输卵管切除术。与接受 TLH 的 NHW 患者相比,NHB 和西班牙裔患者接受输卵管切除术的几率相同 [NHB RR 0.98 (CI 0.97-0.98); Hispanic RR 0.99 (CI 0.99-0.999)] 。接受 TVH [NHB RR 1.04 (CI 0.997-1.1); Hispanic RR 1.1 (CI 1.1-1.2)] 和 LAVH [NHB RR 0.95 (CI 0.93-0.97); Hispanic 0.997 (CI 0.98-1.01)]的患者也是如此。在对年龄、糖尿病、吸烟、高血压、美国麻醉医师协会等级和手术年份进行调整后,RRs 保持相似。这与之前的研究相比有所改变,可能表明国家在减少与机会性输卵管切除术相关的健康差异方面有所改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
期刊最新文献
Is vaginal repair a good option for severe cesarean scar defect? Comparison of women with or without residual myometrium. Pelvic splenosis Mimicking Pelvic Tumor. Uterine Artery Embolization before Myomectomy: Is it worth the trouble? Vaginal Bulge is Not Always Prolapse. Use of Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Comparative Review of Major National Guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1