Jesse M. Brown , Devin P. Barry , Amanda Lewis , Timothy H. Trumbull , Marco T. Pigni , Travis Greene , Robert C. Block , Alec Golas , Yaron Danon
{"title":"Unresolved resonance parameter evaluation and uncertainty quantification of n+181Ta reactions","authors":"Jesse M. Brown , Devin P. Barry , Amanda Lewis , Timothy H. Trumbull , Marco T. Pigni , Travis Greene , Robert C. Block , Alec Golas , Yaron Danon","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear technology applications, including reactor modeling, accelerator design, and isotope production, strongly depend on evaluated nuclear data libraries and their uncertainty information for the assessment of predictive accuracy of calculated quantities. Major nuclear data libraries such as JENDL-5, JEFF-3.3, and ENDF/B-VIII.0 lack uncertainty information for <span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>+</mo></mrow></math></span><sup>181</sup>Ta reactions. In addition to the lack of evaluated uncertainty information even in major nuclear data library releases, the most current US ENDF/B-VIII.0 evaluation of the unresolved resonance region (URR) does not extend to high enough energies to appropriately account for resonance self-shielding effects. This work addresses these shortcomings through a new evaluation of the URR, performed with the SAMMY evaluation tool, which extends the evaluation of the URR to encompass neutron energies of 2.5 keV to 100 keV. This study reports evaluated covariances and includes newly measured data in the evaluation analysis that were unavailable to previous evaluators. The new evaluation was designed to be closely coupled to the resolved resonance region evaluation to improve consistency across multiple evaluation regions. The updated cross sections in the URR have reduced capture and total cross sections, which improve agreement with differential measurements compared to ENDF/B-VIII.0, but they deviate slightly further from integral benchmarks.<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 111013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924006765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nuclear technology applications, including reactor modeling, accelerator design, and isotope production, strongly depend on evaluated nuclear data libraries and their uncertainty information for the assessment of predictive accuracy of calculated quantities. Major nuclear data libraries such as JENDL-5, JEFF-3.3, and ENDF/B-VIII.0 lack uncertainty information for 181Ta reactions. In addition to the lack of evaluated uncertainty information even in major nuclear data library releases, the most current US ENDF/B-VIII.0 evaluation of the unresolved resonance region (URR) does not extend to high enough energies to appropriately account for resonance self-shielding effects. This work addresses these shortcomings through a new evaluation of the URR, performed with the SAMMY evaluation tool, which extends the evaluation of the URR to encompass neutron energies of 2.5 keV to 100 keV. This study reports evaluated covariances and includes newly measured data in the evaluation analysis that were unavailable to previous evaluators. The new evaluation was designed to be closely coupled to the resolved resonance region evaluation to improve consistency across multiple evaluation regions. The updated cross sections in the URR have reduced capture and total cross sections, which improve agreement with differential measurements compared to ENDF/B-VIII.0, but they deviate slightly further from integral benchmarks.1
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.