Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Professional Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.11.003
Lucy Graham , Mary Jo Stanley , Erin C. Donovan , Jeremy Tost
{"title":"Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success","authors":"Lucy Graham ,&nbsp;Mary Jo Stanley ,&nbsp;Erin C. Donovan ,&nbsp;Jeremy Tost","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing schools admit students who are highly qualified using a variety of admission criteria. Even when picking top achievers, it does not guarantee NCLEX-RN success. Nursing programs too often maintain outdated or unvalidated admission processes. Using data to drive decision-making takes time, but improvement processes like the Plan-Do-Study-Act model can make it more achievable.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The purpose of the quality improvement project was to examine a variety of variables readily available to most programs and examine which variables correlated with and predicted the outcome of interest, first-time NCLEX-RN pass success.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The quality improvement project used a retrospective quantitative descriptive design to compare pre-admission criteria, demographic variables, Kaplan exam scores, and nursing program course failures with NCLEX-RN first attempt pass rates for four cohorts of traditional BSN students at a public, regional university of approximately 10,000 students situated in the western U.S. serving largely rural counties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Course failure while in nursing school was the strongest predictor of NCLEX-RN first-time failure. Pre-nursing school GPA and pre-admission overall Kaplan scores were statistically significant predictors, with pre-nursing school GPA accounting for greater variance in NCLEX-RN first-time failure rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A full review of program data is needed for transformational action and changes to occur, moving programs past fleeting change that does not essentially “move the needle.”</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324001728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nursing schools admit students who are highly qualified using a variety of admission criteria. Even when picking top achievers, it does not guarantee NCLEX-RN success. Nursing programs too often maintain outdated or unvalidated admission processes. Using data to drive decision-making takes time, but improvement processes like the Plan-Do-Study-Act model can make it more achievable.

Aim

The purpose of the quality improvement project was to examine a variety of variables readily available to most programs and examine which variables correlated with and predicted the outcome of interest, first-time NCLEX-RN pass success.

Method

The quality improvement project used a retrospective quantitative descriptive design to compare pre-admission criteria, demographic variables, Kaplan exam scores, and nursing program course failures with NCLEX-RN first attempt pass rates for four cohorts of traditional BSN students at a public, regional university of approximately 10,000 students situated in the western U.S. serving largely rural counties.

Results

Course failure while in nursing school was the strongest predictor of NCLEX-RN first-time failure. Pre-nursing school GPA and pre-admission overall Kaplan scores were statistically significant predictors, with pre-nursing school GPA accounting for greater variance in NCLEX-RN first-time failure rates.

Conclusion

A full review of program data is needed for transformational action and changes to occur, moving programs past fleeting change that does not essentially “move the needle.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用数据推动计划变革:重新计算 NCLEX-RN 的成功率
背景护理学校通过各种录取标准招收高素质的学生。即使是挑选成绩优秀的学生,也不能保证他们能成功通过 NCLEX-RN。护理专业往往采用过时或未经验证的录取流程。使用数据来推动决策需要时间,但 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "模式等改进流程可以使其更容易实现。质量改进项目的目的是检查大多数项目都能获得的各种变量,并检查哪些变量与所关注的结果(首次通过 NCLEX-RN 考试的成功率)相关并能预测该结果。方法该质量改进项目采用回顾性定量描述设计,比较了美国西部一所公立地区性大学四批传统 BSN 学生的入学前标准、人口统计学变量、Kaplan 考试成绩、护理专业课程不及格率和 NCLEX-RN 初试通过率,这所大学约有 10,000 名学生,主要服务于美国西部的农村地区。护理学校入学前的 GPA 和入学前的 Kaplan 总分在统计学上具有显著的预测作用,护理学校入学前的 GPA 在 NCLEX-RN 首次不及格率方面的差异更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
期刊最新文献
Comparing characteristics of underrepresented versus majority student groups enrolled in US nursing programs Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success Expanding clinical placement opportunities: Exploring night shift experiences for nursing students Newly graduated and nurse resident competencies: Perceptions of nurse faculty and acute care hospital leaders in the state of Maryland Navigating challenges and cultivating connections: Faculty experiences teaching RN-BSN students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1