Lucy Graham , Mary Jo Stanley , Erin C. Donovan , Jeremy Tost
{"title":"Using data to drive programmatic change: Recalculating NCLEX-RN success","authors":"Lucy Graham , Mary Jo Stanley , Erin C. Donovan , Jeremy Tost","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing schools admit students who are highly qualified using a variety of admission criteria. Even when picking top achievers, it does not guarantee NCLEX-RN success. Nursing programs too often maintain outdated or unvalidated admission processes. Using data to drive decision-making takes time, but improvement processes like the Plan-Do-Study-Act model can make it more achievable.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The purpose of the quality improvement project was to examine a variety of variables readily available to most programs and examine which variables correlated with and predicted the outcome of interest, first-time NCLEX-RN pass success.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The quality improvement project used a retrospective quantitative descriptive design to compare pre-admission criteria, demographic variables, Kaplan exam scores, and nursing program course failures with NCLEX-RN first attempt pass rates for four cohorts of traditional BSN students at a public, regional university of approximately 10,000 students situated in the western U.S. serving largely rural counties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Course failure while in nursing school was the strongest predictor of NCLEX-RN first-time failure. Pre-nursing school GPA and pre-admission overall Kaplan scores were statistically significant predictors, with pre-nursing school GPA accounting for greater variance in NCLEX-RN first-time failure rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A full review of program data is needed for transformational action and changes to occur, moving programs past fleeting change that does not essentially “move the needle.”</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722324001728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Nursing schools admit students who are highly qualified using a variety of admission criteria. Even when picking top achievers, it does not guarantee NCLEX-RN success. Nursing programs too often maintain outdated or unvalidated admission processes. Using data to drive decision-making takes time, but improvement processes like the Plan-Do-Study-Act model can make it more achievable.
Aim
The purpose of the quality improvement project was to examine a variety of variables readily available to most programs and examine which variables correlated with and predicted the outcome of interest, first-time NCLEX-RN pass success.
Method
The quality improvement project used a retrospective quantitative descriptive design to compare pre-admission criteria, demographic variables, Kaplan exam scores, and nursing program course failures with NCLEX-RN first attempt pass rates for four cohorts of traditional BSN students at a public, regional university of approximately 10,000 students situated in the western U.S. serving largely rural counties.
Results
Course failure while in nursing school was the strongest predictor of NCLEX-RN first-time failure. Pre-nursing school GPA and pre-admission overall Kaplan scores were statistically significant predictors, with pre-nursing school GPA accounting for greater variance in NCLEX-RN first-time failure rates.
Conclusion
A full review of program data is needed for transformational action and changes to occur, moving programs past fleeting change that does not essentially “move the needle.”
期刊介绍:
The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.