Validation and network structure of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale: A psychometric investigation in an Arabic context

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101689
Sameh Said-Metwaly , Amany Farahat Abdalmageid , Changsheng Chen , Wim Van den Noortgate
{"title":"Validation and network structure of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale: A psychometric investigation in an Arabic context","authors":"Sameh Said-Metwaly ,&nbsp;Amany Farahat Abdalmageid ,&nbsp;Changsheng Chen ,&nbsp;Wim Van den Noortgate","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS), a self-report measure designed to capture creative behaviors across various domains, has been utilized and validated across different cultural contexts. The present study sought to assess the psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the K-DOCS. Using exploratory graph analysis followed by confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory analysis, the factor structure of the K-DOCS was assessed. Additionally, the criterion validity of the K-DOCS was assessed in relation to measures of openness and emotional intelligence. Beyond validation, the study examined the network structure of the K-DOCS domains to understand their interconnections and investigated potential domain network differences based on gender, age, and academic major. Data were collected among 2,594 Egyptian university students. The results suggest that the K-DOCS has a five-factor structure broadly consistent with the theoretical factor structure and demonstrates acceptable criterion validity. The results further reveal that the K-DOCS domains cluster together into a single interconnected community, with significant differences in domain connectivity based on gender and age, but not on academic major. The implications of these results for the conceptualization and measurement of creativity are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712400227X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS), a self-report measure designed to capture creative behaviors across various domains, has been utilized and validated across different cultural contexts. The present study sought to assess the psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the K-DOCS. Using exploratory graph analysis followed by confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory analysis, the factor structure of the K-DOCS was assessed. Additionally, the criterion validity of the K-DOCS was assessed in relation to measures of openness and emotional intelligence. Beyond validation, the study examined the network structure of the K-DOCS domains to understand their interconnections and investigated potential domain network differences based on gender, age, and academic major. Data were collected among 2,594 Egyptian university students. The results suggest that the K-DOCS has a five-factor structure broadly consistent with the theoretical factor structure and demonstrates acceptable criterion validity. The results further reveal that the K-DOCS domains cluster together into a single interconnected community, with significant differences in domain connectivity based on gender and age, but not on academic major. The implications of these results for the conceptualization and measurement of creativity are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考夫曼创造力领域量表的验证和网络结构:阿拉伯语环境下的心理测量调查
考夫曼创造力领域量表(Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale,简称 K-DOCS)是一种自我报告量表,旨在反映不同领域的创造性行为,已在不同文化背景下得到使用和验证。本研究旨在评估阿拉伯语版 K-DOCS 的心理测量特性。通过探索性图表分析、确认性因素分析和项目反应理论分析,对 K-DOCS 的因素结构进行了评估。此外,还评估了 K-DOCS 与开放性和情商测量的标准有效性。除了验证之外,研究还检验了 K-DOCS 各领域的网络结构,以了解它们之间的相互联系,并调查了基于性别、年龄和专业的潜在领域网络差异。研究收集了 2594 名埃及大学生的数据。结果表明,K-DOCS 的五因素结构与理论因素结构基本一致,并显示出可接受的标准效度。研究结果进一步表明,K-DOCS 的各个领域聚集成一个相互联系的群体,不同性别和年龄的学生在领域连接性方面存在显著差异,而不同专业的学生在领域连接性方面则不存在显著差异。本文讨论了这些结果对创造力概念化和测量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Validation and network structure of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale: A psychometric investigation in an Arabic context Creativity and motor skill learning among kindergarten children: Investigating Predictive correlations and performance differences The influence of group categorization and common ingroup identity on malevolent creativity, benevolent creativity, and neutral creativity The long-term impact of executive functions on everyday creativity among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal mediation model of emotional resilience and creative self-efficacy Measuring parental behaviors supporting higher order thinking skills in children: A scale development study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1