Behavioral coping with chronic defeat stress in mice: A systematic review of current protocols

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Neurobiology of Stress Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100689
Alina Díez-Solinska , Zurine De Miguel , Garikoitz Azkona , Oscar Vegas
{"title":"Behavioral coping with chronic defeat stress in mice: A systematic review of current protocols","authors":"Alina Díez-Solinska ,&nbsp;Zurine De Miguel ,&nbsp;Garikoitz Azkona ,&nbsp;Oscar Vegas","doi":"10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social stress is the most significant source of chronic stress in humans and is commonly associated with health impairment. Individual differences in the behavioral coping responses to stress have been proposed to mediate the negative effects of stress on physical, behavioral and mental health. Animal models, particularly mice, offer valuable insights into the physiological and neurobiological correlates of behavioral coping strategies in response to chronic social stress. Here we aim to identify differences and similarities among stress protocols in mice, with particular attention to how neuroendocrine and/or behavioral responses vary according to different coping strategies, while highlighting the need for standardized approaches in future research. A systematic review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA statement). A total of 213 references were identified by electronic search, and after the screening, 18 articles were found to meet all the established criteria. We analyzed differences in the stress protocol, the characterization and classification of coping strategies and the physiological and behavioral differences according to coping. The results show that differences in behavioural expression under chronic social stress (coping) may also be associated with physiological differences and differential susceptibility to disease. However, this review also underlines the importance of a cautious interpretation of the results obtained. The lack of consistency in the nomenclature and procedures associated with the study of coping strategies for social stress, as well as the absence of a uniform classification, highlight the importance of using a common language when approaching the study of coping strategies. Thereby, this review encourages the development of a more defined method and criteria for assessing coping strategies, based on both behavioral and biological indicators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19125,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Stress","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100689"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352289524000857","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social stress is the most significant source of chronic stress in humans and is commonly associated with health impairment. Individual differences in the behavioral coping responses to stress have been proposed to mediate the negative effects of stress on physical, behavioral and mental health. Animal models, particularly mice, offer valuable insights into the physiological and neurobiological correlates of behavioral coping strategies in response to chronic social stress. Here we aim to identify differences and similarities among stress protocols in mice, with particular attention to how neuroendocrine and/or behavioral responses vary according to different coping strategies, while highlighting the need for standardized approaches in future research. A systematic review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA statement). A total of 213 references were identified by electronic search, and after the screening, 18 articles were found to meet all the established criteria. We analyzed differences in the stress protocol, the characterization and classification of coping strategies and the physiological and behavioral differences according to coping. The results show that differences in behavioural expression under chronic social stress (coping) may also be associated with physiological differences and differential susceptibility to disease. However, this review also underlines the importance of a cautious interpretation of the results obtained. The lack of consistency in the nomenclature and procedures associated with the study of coping strategies for social stress, as well as the absence of a uniform classification, highlight the importance of using a common language when approaching the study of coping strategies. Thereby, this review encourages the development of a more defined method and criteria for assessing coping strategies, based on both behavioral and biological indicators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小鼠对慢性失败压力的行为应对:当前方案的系统回顾
社会压力是人类最主要的慢性压力来源,通常与健康受损有关。有人提出,个体在应对压力的行为反应方面存在差异,这可能是压力对身体、行为和心理健康产生负面影响的中介因素。动物模型,尤其是小鼠,为我们深入了解应对慢性社会压力的行为策略的生理和神经生物学相关性提供了宝贵的资料。在此,我们旨在找出小鼠应激方案之间的异同,特别关注神经内分泌和/或行为反应如何根据不同的应对策略而变化,同时强调在未来研究中采用标准化方法的必要性。我们按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA 声明)进行了系统综述。通过电子检索共找到 213 篇参考文献,经过筛选,发现 18 篇文章符合所有既定标准。我们分析了压力协议的差异、应对策略的特征和分类以及应对策略的生理和行为差异。结果表明,慢性社会压力(应对)下的行为表现差异也可能与生理差异和对疾病的不同易感性有关。不过,本综述也强调了谨慎解释所获结果的重要性。与社会压力应对策略研究相关的术语和程序缺乏一致性,也没有统一的分类方法,这突出了在研究应对策略时使用共同语言的重要性。因此,本综述鼓励根据行为和生物指标,制定更加明确的应对策略评估方法和标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Stress
Neurobiology of Stress Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Stress is a multidisciplinary journal for the publication of original research and review articles on basic, translational and clinical research into stress and related disorders. It will focus on the impact of stress on the brain from cellular to behavioral functions and stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders (such as depression, trauma and anxiety). The translation of basic research findings into real-world applications will be a key aim of the journal. Basic, translational and clinical research on the following topics as they relate to stress will be covered: Molecular substrates and cell signaling, Genetics and epigenetics, Stress circuitry, Structural and physiological plasticity, Developmental Aspects, Laboratory models of stress, Neuroinflammation and pathology, Memory and Cognition, Motivational Processes, Fear and Anxiety, Stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders (including depression, PTSD, substance abuse), Neuropsychopharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Behavioral coping with chronic defeat stress in mice: A systematic review of current protocols Sex specific gut-microbiota signatures of resilient and comorbid gut-brain phenotypes induced by early life stress Transcriptome dynamics in mouse amygdala under acute and chronic stress revealed by thiol-labeled RNA sequencing Transient impact of chronic social stress on effort-based reward motivation in non-food restricted mice: Involvement of corticosterone Acute stress activates basolateral amygdala neurons expressing corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor type 1 (CRHR1): Topographical distribution and projection-specific activation in male and female rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1