Broadening the definition of healthcare products in global trade: Insights from a new classification

Pierre Cotterlaz , Guillaume Gaulier , Aude Sztulman , Deniz Ünal
{"title":"Broadening the definition of healthcare products in global trade: Insights from a new classification","authors":"Pierre Cotterlaz ,&nbsp;Guillaume Gaulier ,&nbsp;Aude Sztulman ,&nbsp;Deniz Ünal","doi":"10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>International trade in healthcare products took off during the 2000s, paralleling the peak of hyper-globalisation. Two decades later, the Covid-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of health security for governments. This crisis brought issues of industrial sovereignty to the forefront and exposed vulnerabilities within global production networks. However, the intricate web of global value chains has compromised the traceability of these essential goods. Additionally, the classification of healthcare products across multiple industries in standard trade and production nomenclatures complicates their identification and further obscures the analysis. In this paper, we systematically identify products that address the needs of national health systems and gather them into a single industry grouping to evaluate the scale and trends in trade. This healthcare industry grouping, encompassing a broad array of products—medicinal products and their compounds, medical technology equipment, and small medical materials— has demonstrated the highest relative growth among all industry groupings since 2000. Our study provides a detailed examination of the nature of global trade in the healthcare industry grouping and its five branches, categorized by production stage (intermediate and final) and quality/price range. We analyze the positioning of advanced economies in comparison to the rest of the world and offer insights into the geographical and geopolitical breakdowns of healthcare industry trade, both within and between country blocs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13794,"journal":{"name":"International Economics","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 100561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701724000842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International trade in healthcare products took off during the 2000s, paralleling the peak of hyper-globalisation. Two decades later, the Covid-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of health security for governments. This crisis brought issues of industrial sovereignty to the forefront and exposed vulnerabilities within global production networks. However, the intricate web of global value chains has compromised the traceability of these essential goods. Additionally, the classification of healthcare products across multiple industries in standard trade and production nomenclatures complicates their identification and further obscures the analysis. In this paper, we systematically identify products that address the needs of national health systems and gather them into a single industry grouping to evaluate the scale and trends in trade. This healthcare industry grouping, encompassing a broad array of products—medicinal products and their compounds, medical technology equipment, and small medical materials— has demonstrated the highest relative growth among all industry groupings since 2000. Our study provides a detailed examination of the nature of global trade in the healthcare industry grouping and its five branches, categorized by production stage (intermediate and final) and quality/price range. We analyze the positioning of advanced economies in comparison to the rest of the world and offer insights into the geographical and geopolitical breakdowns of healthcare industry trade, both within and between country blocs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拓宽全球贸易中保健产品的定义:新分类法的启示
2000 年代,伴随着超级全球化的高峰期,医疗保健产品的国际贸易也随之兴起。二十年后,Covid-19 大流行凸显了健康安全对各国政府的重要性。这场危机将产业主权问题推到了风口浪尖,并暴露了全球生产网络的脆弱性。然而,错综复杂的全球价值链网络损害了这些必需品的可追溯性。此外,标准贸易和生产术语对多个行业的医疗保健产品进行分类,使其识别变得复杂,进一步模糊了分析。在本文中,我们系统地识别了满足国家卫生系统需求的产品,并将其归入单一行业类别,以评估贸易规模和趋势。这一医疗保健产业分组涵盖了一系列产品--医药产品及其化合物、医疗技术设备和小型医用材料--自 2000 年以来在所有产业分组中表现出了最高的相对增长。我们的研究按照生产阶段(中间阶段和最终阶段)和质量/价格范围对医疗保健产业分组及其五个分支的全球贸易性质进行了详细分析。我们分析了发达经济体与世界其他地区相比的定位,并深入分析了医疗保健行业贸易在国家集团内部和国家集团之间的地理和地缘政治细分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Economics
International Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Do ICTs promote the renewable energy consumption? The moderating effects of economic growth and structural transformation in Africa The impact of the belt and road initiative on international consumption risk sharing: A difference-in-differences analysis Broadening the definition of healthcare products in global trade: Insights from a new classification This is going to hurt: Weather anomalies, supply chain pressures and inflation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1