Commentary:- Can I use that tool?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301843
Graeme Horsman
{"title":"Commentary:- Can I use that tool?","authors":"Graeme Horsman","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The decision as to whether a given tool can be used for the purposes of conducting a digital forensic examination of a device and its data may seem straightforward, but it is not. As part of their work, practitioners must always seek to identify and use tools that are appropriate for their investigative tasks, deploy them reliably within an applicable scenario, and be able to trust and understand the results that they provide. Before they can begin to do this, they must first ask themselves the question - ‘<em>can I use that tool?</em>‘, where this work considers how a practitioner may begin to formulate an answer. By unpacking the hidden complexity of this question, it is suggested that five sub-questions must be explored by any practitioner when seeking to use a tool, namely - (1) ‘<em>what does that tool do?</em>‘; (2) ‘<em>how do I use that tool?</em>‘; (3) ‘<em>how does the tool do it?</em>‘; (4) ‘<em>does the tool do it properly?</em>’ and (5) ‘<em>should I use the tool?</em>‘. This work discusses each in turn and the risks they pose to a practitioner.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 301843"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281724001707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decision as to whether a given tool can be used for the purposes of conducting a digital forensic examination of a device and its data may seem straightforward, but it is not. As part of their work, practitioners must always seek to identify and use tools that are appropriate for their investigative tasks, deploy them reliably within an applicable scenario, and be able to trust and understand the results that they provide. Before they can begin to do this, they must first ask themselves the question - ‘can I use that tool?‘, where this work considers how a practitioner may begin to formulate an answer. By unpacking the hidden complexity of this question, it is suggested that five sub-questions must be explored by any practitioner when seeking to use a tool, namely - (1) ‘what does that tool do?‘; (2) ‘how do I use that tool?‘; (3) ‘how does the tool do it?‘; (4) ‘does the tool do it properly?’ and (5) ‘should I use the tool?‘. This work discusses each in turn and the risks they pose to a practitioner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评论:- 我能使用那个工具吗?
决定某一工具是否可用于对设备及其数据进行数字取证检查的目的看似简单,实则不然。作为工作的一部分,从业人员必须始终努力识别和使用适合其调查任务的工具,在适用场景中可靠地部署这些工具,并能够信任和理解这些工具提供的结果。在开始这样做之前,他们必须先问自己一个问题--"我能使用这种工具吗?通过揭开这个问题隐藏的复杂性,我们认为,任何从业人员在寻求使用一种工具时,都必须探讨五个子问题,即:(1)"该工具有什么作用?";(2)"我该如何使用该工具?";(3)"该工具如何做到这一点?";(4)"该工具是否能正确做到这一点?";以及(5)"我是否应该使用该工具?本作品将依次讨论这些问题以及它们给从业人员带来的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring the potential of large language models for improving digital forensic investigation efficiency Optimising data set creation in the cybersecurity landscape with a special focus on digital forensics: Principles, characteristics, and use cases Tool induced biases? Misleading data presentation as a biasing source in digital forensic analysis WristSense framework: Exploring the forensic potential of wrist-wear devices through case studies The ghost in the building: Non-invasive spoofing and covert attacks on automated buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1