Towards a comprehensive boundary tectonism model for the late Paleozoic Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogeny

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Structural Geology Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105275
Vincent S. Nowaczewski , Daniel M. Sturmer , Benjamin L. Vaughan
{"title":"Towards a comprehensive boundary tectonism model for the late Paleozoic Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogeny","authors":"Vincent S. Nowaczewski ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Sturmer ,&nbsp;Benjamin L. Vaughan","doi":"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The orientations of intra-cratonic uplifts are commonly used to posit modes of boundary tectonism on continental margins during the time of uplift generation. In North America, a quintessential example of this practice is the ongoing interpretation of the late Paleozoic Ancestral Rocky Mountain Orogeny (ARMO). Continental margins active during ARMO uplifts have been subsequently modified or destroyed, and direct evidence for the styles of coeval tectonism obscured by later deformation, especially within the western Cordillera. Thus, there is a sustained history of workers attempting to deduce the tectonic state of late Paleozoic Laurentian margins from the characteristics of recognized uplifts. Here, using a 3D Finite Element Method (FEM) we show that it is necessary to consider the complete picture of continental fringing tectonism to understand how the intracontinental stress field could be compatible with the ARMO uplifts. Of the preexisting models tested, the model including a transform boundary on the western continental margin is most consistent with ARMO uplifts. A new tectonism model is derived including a left-lateral transtensional boundary on the Laurentian western margin and a refined compressional history along the Appalachian-Marathon margin. Modeling suggests that contemporaneous extension along eastern Greenland may have limited northward growth of the ARMO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Geology","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 105275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019181412400227X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The orientations of intra-cratonic uplifts are commonly used to posit modes of boundary tectonism on continental margins during the time of uplift generation. In North America, a quintessential example of this practice is the ongoing interpretation of the late Paleozoic Ancestral Rocky Mountain Orogeny (ARMO). Continental margins active during ARMO uplifts have been subsequently modified or destroyed, and direct evidence for the styles of coeval tectonism obscured by later deformation, especially within the western Cordillera. Thus, there is a sustained history of workers attempting to deduce the tectonic state of late Paleozoic Laurentian margins from the characteristics of recognized uplifts. Here, using a 3D Finite Element Method (FEM) we show that it is necessary to consider the complete picture of continental fringing tectonism to understand how the intracontinental stress field could be compatible with the ARMO uplifts. Of the preexisting models tested, the model including a transform boundary on the western continental margin is most consistent with ARMO uplifts. A new tectonism model is derived including a left-lateral transtensional boundary on the Laurentian western margin and a refined compressional history along the Appalachian-Marathon margin. Modeling suggests that contemporaneous extension along eastern Greenland may have limited northward growth of the ARMO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为晚古生代洛矶山造山运动建立一个全面的边界构造模型
地壳内隆起的方向通常被用来推测隆起产生时期大陆边缘的边界构造模式。在北美洲,这种做法的典型例子是正在进行的对晚古生代祖落基山造山运动(ARMO)的解释。ARMO 隆起过程中活跃的大陆边缘后来被改变或破坏,共生构造运动风格的直接证据被后来的变形所掩盖,尤其是在西科迪勒拉山系。因此,一直以来都有研究人员试图从公认的隆起特征中推断晚古生代劳伦伦边缘的构造状态。在这里,我们利用三维有限元方法(FEM)表明,要理解大陆内应力场如何与 ARMO 隆起相一致,就必须考虑大陆边缘构造的全貌。在测试过的已有模型中,包括西部大陆边缘转换边界的模型与 ARMO 隆起最为一致。新的构造模型包括劳伦伦西部边缘的左侧转换边界和阿巴拉契亚-马拉松边缘的细化压缩历史。模型表明,格陵兰岛东部同期的延伸可能限制了ARMO向北的增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Geology
Journal of Structural Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
19.40%
发文量
192
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structural Geology publishes process-oriented investigations about structural geology using appropriate combinations of analog and digital field data, seismic reflection data, satellite-derived data, geometric analysis, kinematic analysis, laboratory experiments, computer visualizations, and analogue or numerical modelling on all scales. Contributions are encouraged to draw perspectives from rheology, rock mechanics, geophysics,metamorphism, sedimentology, petroleum geology, economic geology, geodynamics, planetary geology, tectonics and neotectonics to provide a more powerful understanding of deformation processes and systems. Given the visual nature of the discipline, supplementary materials that portray the data and analysis in 3-D or quasi 3-D manners, including the use of videos, and/or graphical abstracts can significantly strengthen the impact of contributions.
期刊最新文献
Coseismic surface deformation and source mechanism of the 2023 Ms 6.2 Jishishan earthquake, northeastern Tibetan Plateau Lithological control and structural inheritance on faults growth in multilayer foreland sequences Cenozoic faulting of the Ganzi-Yushu (Xianshuihe) fault from apatite (U-Th)/He ages and its implications for the tectonic reorganization in the southeastern Tibetan plateau Seismic and outcrop-based 3D characterization of fault damage zones in sandstones, Rio do Peixe Basin, Brazil Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1