Factors associated with mental health outcomes among peer refugee helpers in Greece: Results from a cross-sectional study

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100365
Michalis Lavdas, Gro Mjeldheim Sandal, Tormod Bøe
{"title":"Factors associated with mental health outcomes among peer refugee helpers in Greece: Results from a cross-sectional study","authors":"Michalis Lavdas,&nbsp;Gro Mjeldheim Sandal,&nbsp;Tormod Bøe","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An increasing number of people are engaged in humanitarian responses worldwide as aid workers. Peer Refugee Helpers (PRHs) are refugees or asylum seekers engaged formally in humanitarian assistance through Aid/Humanitarian Organizations, yet the factors affecting their mental health are poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to investigate the mental health of PRHs and explore factors that may contribute to anxiety and depression in this group through the lens of the Salutogenic Model of Health (SMH).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted comparing PRHs engaged with Aid/Humanitarian Organizations (AOs) in Greece with non-helpers (N = 248), all of whom had experienced forced migration. Standardized instruments were used to measure symptoms of depression and anxiety (GAD-7, PHQ-9), social support (SPS-24), sense of coherence (SOC-13), coping flexibility (PACT), and trauma exposure (BTQ-10). Using regression analyses, we compared symptoms of anxiety and depression in a group of PRHs (n = 107) to a control group of non-helpers (n = 141). Socio-demographic variables (ex. occupational status) were also included in the model. Furthermore, we investigated protective and risk factors for anxiety and depression within the group of PRHs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PRHs did not differ significantly from the non-helpers in their anxiety and depression levels. In the adjusted regression analyses within the group of PRHs, being paid and having a higher sense of coherence were significantly associated with lower anxiety and depression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To enhance the well-being and mental health of refugees working as PRHs in the humanitarian field, AOs should first address post-migration living difficulties that contribute to anxiety and depression. Second, PRHs should be supported adequately through training and supervision that will help them build fundamental competencies. Third, compensation for the PRH engagement is instrumental in addressing job insecurity, while facilitating access to resources, relevant to basic and psychological needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100365"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An increasing number of people are engaged in humanitarian responses worldwide as aid workers. Peer Refugee Helpers (PRHs) are refugees or asylum seekers engaged formally in humanitarian assistance through Aid/Humanitarian Organizations, yet the factors affecting their mental health are poorly understood.

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the mental health of PRHs and explore factors that may contribute to anxiety and depression in this group through the lens of the Salutogenic Model of Health (SMH).

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted comparing PRHs engaged with Aid/Humanitarian Organizations (AOs) in Greece with non-helpers (N = 248), all of whom had experienced forced migration. Standardized instruments were used to measure symptoms of depression and anxiety (GAD-7, PHQ-9), social support (SPS-24), sense of coherence (SOC-13), coping flexibility (PACT), and trauma exposure (BTQ-10). Using regression analyses, we compared symptoms of anxiety and depression in a group of PRHs (n = 107) to a control group of non-helpers (n = 141). Socio-demographic variables (ex. occupational status) were also included in the model. Furthermore, we investigated protective and risk factors for anxiety and depression within the group of PRHs.

Results

PRHs did not differ significantly from the non-helpers in their anxiety and depression levels. In the adjusted regression analyses within the group of PRHs, being paid and having a higher sense of coherence were significantly associated with lower anxiety and depression.

Conclusions

To enhance the well-being and mental health of refugees working as PRHs in the humanitarian field, AOs should first address post-migration living difficulties that contribute to anxiety and depression. Second, PRHs should be supported adequately through training and supervision that will help them build fundamental competencies. Third, compensation for the PRH engagement is instrumental in addressing job insecurity, while facilitating access to resources, relevant to basic and psychological needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊同行难民援助者心理健康结果的相关因素:横断面研究结果
背景越来越多的人以援助工作者的身份参与到世界各地的人道主义救援工作中。难民同伴互助者(PRHs)是通过援助/人道主义组织正式参与人道主义援助的难民或寻求庇护者,但人们对影响他们心理健康的因素却知之甚少。本研究旨在调查PRHs的心理健康状况,并从健康致乐模式(SMH)的角度探讨可能导致该群体焦虑和抑郁的因素。方法 本研究对参与希腊援助/人道主义组织(AOs)的PRHs和非援助者(N = 248)进行了横断面比较,所有这些人都经历过被迫移民。我们使用标准化工具来测量抑郁和焦虑症状(GAD-7、PHQ-9)、社会支持(SPS-24)、连贯感(SOC-13)、应对灵活性(PACT)和创伤暴露(BTQ-10)。通过回归分析,我们比较了一组 PRHs(n = 107)和一组非求助者(n = 141)的焦虑和抑郁症状。社会人口变量(如职业状况)也被纳入模型。此外,我们还调查了公屋居民组中焦虑和抑郁的保护因素和风险因素。结论为了提高在人道主义领域担任家佣的难民的福利和心理健康水平,救援组织应首先解决导致焦虑和抑郁的移民后生活困难。其次,应通过培训和监督为公共卫生人员提供充分支持,帮助他们建立基本能力。第三,对难民专员的工作给予补偿,有助于解决工作不稳定的问题,同时促进他们获得与基本需求和心理需求相关的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
The social construction of mental illness stigma amongst Asians: A systematic review and meta-ethnography Exploring the societal implications of digital mental health technologies: A critical review Juggling to stay afloat: Debt and health under financialization Developing an explanatory model of alcohol misuse among South Sudanese refugees in northern Uganda: A qualitative study A qualitative study of type 1 diabetes complications, mental health, and structural pathways of complications occurrence among young people (14–24 years) and caregivers in southern Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1