Three-dimensional evaluation framework of hazard–exposure–vulnerability for mapping heatwave risk and associated dominant dimensions in China

IF 3.5 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES International Journal of Climatology Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1002/joc.8628
Jinping Liu, Tongchang Zhang, Yanqun Ren, Patrick Willems, Ali Mirchi, Arfan Arshad, Tie Liu, Quoc Bao Pham
{"title":"Three-dimensional evaluation framework of hazard–exposure–vulnerability for mapping heatwave risk and associated dominant dimensions in China","authors":"Jinping Liu,&nbsp;Tongchang Zhang,&nbsp;Yanqun Ren,&nbsp;Patrick Willems,&nbsp;Ali Mirchi,&nbsp;Arfan Arshad,&nbsp;Tie Liu,&nbsp;Quoc Bao Pham","doi":"10.1002/joc.8628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the context of global warming, the frequency, intensity, and duration of heatwave events have markedly increased, bearing profound implications for both natural ecosystems and human societies. To effectively cope with this challenge, it is imperative to accurately identify and comprehensively assess the risks posed by heatwaves. This study undertakes a systematic approach and robust methodology to assess heatwave risks by leveraging a diverse array of data sources—encompassing remote sensing, statistical analyses. The methodology integrates the risk triangle theory alongside established risk assessment frameworks laid out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Employing a three-dimensional evaluation framework encompassing hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, we unravel spatial–temporal patterns, high-risk zones, and dominant dimensions of heatwave risks contributing to potential disasters. Results indicated that during 1999–2008, roughly 27% of the study areas were affected by high and above risk levels of heatwaves, and the areas with high and very high hazard, exposure, and vulnerability accounted for approximately 19.5%, 10%, and 32.5%, respectively. During 2009–2018, the proportion of areas with high and very high risk, hazard, and exposure increased to about 31%, 26%, and 14%, respectively, while the percentage of areas with high and very high vulnerability decreased to about 24.43%. Notably, Xinjiang and the western part of Northwestern China are characterized by hazard-dominant conditions, while Southern China's risk profile has shifted from 1999–2008 to 2009–2018 from high hazard and vulnerability conditions to a more complex interaction involving hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. Moreover, Northern China and the northern segment of Southwestern China exhibit simultaneous high-risk rankings across hazard, exposure, and vulnerability dimensions, forming a comprehensive high-risk zone. These findings characterize heatwave risk patterns and offer critical insights for risk management decisions, guiding effective disaster prevention and relief measures to ensure socio-economic stability and public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":"44 14","pages":"5136-5155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of global warming, the frequency, intensity, and duration of heatwave events have markedly increased, bearing profound implications for both natural ecosystems and human societies. To effectively cope with this challenge, it is imperative to accurately identify and comprehensively assess the risks posed by heatwaves. This study undertakes a systematic approach and robust methodology to assess heatwave risks by leveraging a diverse array of data sources—encompassing remote sensing, statistical analyses. The methodology integrates the risk triangle theory alongside established risk assessment frameworks laid out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Employing a three-dimensional evaluation framework encompassing hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, we unravel spatial–temporal patterns, high-risk zones, and dominant dimensions of heatwave risks contributing to potential disasters. Results indicated that during 1999–2008, roughly 27% of the study areas were affected by high and above risk levels of heatwaves, and the areas with high and very high hazard, exposure, and vulnerability accounted for approximately 19.5%, 10%, and 32.5%, respectively. During 2009–2018, the proportion of areas with high and very high risk, hazard, and exposure increased to about 31%, 26%, and 14%, respectively, while the percentage of areas with high and very high vulnerability decreased to about 24.43%. Notably, Xinjiang and the western part of Northwestern China are characterized by hazard-dominant conditions, while Southern China's risk profile has shifted from 1999–2008 to 2009–2018 from high hazard and vulnerability conditions to a more complex interaction involving hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. Moreover, Northern China and the northern segment of Southwestern China exhibit simultaneous high-risk rankings across hazard, exposure, and vulnerability dimensions, forming a comprehensive high-risk zone. These findings characterize heatwave risk patterns and offer critical insights for risk management decisions, guiding effective disaster prevention and relief measures to ensure socio-economic stability and public health.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制中国热浪风险及相关主导维度的 "危害-暴露-脆弱性 "三维评估框架
在全球变暖的背景下,热浪事件的频率、强度和持续时间明显增加,对自然生态系统和人类社会都产生了深远的影响。为了有效应对这一挑战,必须准确识别和全面评估热浪带来的风险。本研究采用系统的方法和稳健的方法论,通过利用包括遥感、统计分析在内的各种数据源来评估热浪风险。该方法将风险三角理论与政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)制定的既定风险评估框架相结合。我们采用了一个包括危害、暴露和脆弱性的三维评估框架,揭示了热浪风险的时空模式、高风险区和导致潜在灾害的主要因素。结果表明,在 1999-2008 年期间,约有 27% 的研究地区受到高及以上热浪风险水平的影响,其中高和极高危害、高暴露和高脆弱性地区分别约占 19.5%、10% 和 32.5%。2009-2018 年间,高风险和极高风险、高危害和高暴露地区的比例分别上升至约 31%、26% 和 14%,而高脆弱和极高脆弱地区的比例则下降至约 24.43%。值得注意的是,新疆和西北地区西部以灾害为主,而从 1999-2008 年到 2009-2018 年,华南地区的风险状况已从高风险和高脆弱性转变为涉及灾害、暴露和脆弱性的更复杂的相互作用。此外,华北地区和西南地区北部同时表现出灾害、暴露和脆弱性方面的高风险等级,形成了一个综合高风险区。这些研究结果描述了热浪风险模式的特征,为风险管理决策提供了重要启示,指导采取有效的防灾救灾措施,确保社会经济稳定和公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Hydrologic Responses to Climate Change and Implications for Reservoirs in the Source Region of the Yangtze River Tropical cyclone landfalls in the Northwest Pacific under global warming Evaluation and projection of changes in temperature and precipitation over Northwest China based on CMIP6 models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1