Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of Skills and Needs Inventories in Functional Behavior Assessments and Interventions (SNI-FBAI-CN)

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1002/bin.2038
Mo Chen, Anuradha S. Dutt, Rahul Nair
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of Skills and Needs Inventories in Functional Behavior Assessments and Interventions (SNI-FBAI-CN)","authors":"Mo Chen,&nbsp;Anuradha S. Dutt,&nbsp;Rahul Nair","doi":"10.1002/bin.2038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of measures are necessary to provide evidence-based educational intervention services among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across countries. Language plays an integral role in the cross-cultural adaptation and validation process of measures. Currently, there are limited validated tools in Chinese available to assess special education teachers' skills in functional behavior assessments and interventions in Mainland China to effectively support students with ASD. This study aimed to validate a Chinese version of the <i>Skills and Needs Inventories in Functional Behavior Assessments and Interventions</i> (SNI-FBAI-CN) in mainland China. The SNI-FBAI, originally developed and validated in Singapore, in the English language, was translated, culturally adapted, and then administered to 239 special education teachers in two schools for children with ASD in China. Results show that the SNI-FBAI-CN has a three-factor structure (i.e., skills in behavioral assessment, skills in behavioral interventions, and needs for training) that fits the data well, with good reliability for the overall scale, as well as the three subscales. Partial measurement invariance was established between the Chinese and the original Singapore samples, providing additional construct validity evidence for this tool. Limitations of this study and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.2038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of measures are necessary to provide evidence-based educational intervention services among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across countries. Language plays an integral role in the cross-cultural adaptation and validation process of measures. Currently, there are limited validated tools in Chinese available to assess special education teachers' skills in functional behavior assessments and interventions in Mainland China to effectively support students with ASD. This study aimed to validate a Chinese version of the Skills and Needs Inventories in Functional Behavior Assessments and Interventions (SNI-FBAI-CN) in mainland China. The SNI-FBAI, originally developed and validated in Singapore, in the English language, was translated, culturally adapted, and then administered to 239 special education teachers in two schools for children with ASD in China. Results show that the SNI-FBAI-CN has a three-factor structure (i.e., skills in behavioral assessment, skills in behavioral interventions, and needs for training) that fits the data well, with good reliability for the overall scale, as well as the three subscales. Partial measurement invariance was established between the Chinese and the original Singapore samples, providing additional construct validity evidence for this tool. Limitations of this study and directions for future research are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能性行为评估和干预中的技能和需求清单》(SNI-FBAI-CN)中文版的跨文化改编和验证
要为不同国家的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童提供循证教育干预服务,就必须对测量方法进行跨文化调整和验证。语言在测量方法的跨文化适应和验证过程中发挥着不可或缺的作用。目前,用于评估中国大陆特殊教育教师功能行为评估和干预技能以有效支持自闭症谱系障碍学生的中文验证工具非常有限。本研究旨在验证功能性行为评估和干预中的技能和需求清单(SNI-FBAI-CN)在中国大陆的中文版本。SNI-FBAI最初是在新加坡开发和验证的英文版,经过翻译和文化调整后,由中国两所ASD儿童学校的239名特殊教育教师实施。结果表明,SNI-FBAI-CN 具有三因素结构(即行为评估技能、行为干预技能和培训需求),与数据吻合良好,总量表和三个分量表都具有良好的信度。在中国样本和新加坡样本之间建立了部分测量不变量,为该工具提供了更多的建构效度证据。本研究的局限性和未来研究方向也在讨论之列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Comparing Equivalence-Based Instruction to a PowerPoint Video Lecture to Teach Differential Reinforcement Descriptors to College Students A Comparison of Medium Probability Versus High Probability Instructions to Increase Cooperation in the Context of the High Probability Instructional Sequence Training Future Teachers to Conduct Trial-Based Functional Analyses Using Virtual Video Modeling and Video Feedback Supporting Procedural Fidelity of Behavioral Interventions for Children With Autism via an Artificial Intelligence Platform Further Translational Evaluations of Efficacy and Preference for Isolated and Synthesized Contingency Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1