A comparison of staff training procedures to teach flexible prompt fading

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1002/bin.2061
Shannon M. Arthur, Justin B. Leaf, Christine Milne, Angela Fuhrmann-Knowles, Ashley N. Creem, Joseph H. Cihon, Florence D. DiGennaro Reed, Mary Jane Weiss
{"title":"A comparison of staff training procedures to teach flexible prompt fading","authors":"Shannon M. Arthur,&nbsp;Justin B. Leaf,&nbsp;Christine Milne,&nbsp;Angela Fuhrmann-Knowles,&nbsp;Ashley N. Creem,&nbsp;Joseph H. Cihon,&nbsp;Florence D. DiGennaro Reed,&nbsp;Mary Jane Weiss","doi":"10.1002/bin.2061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quality behavior intervention requires critical thinking skills, in-the-moment analysis, flexibility, and clinical judgment. Yet, there has been limited research on developing these complex skills. Flexible prompt fading (FPF) is a prompting procedure that requires the interventionist to continually analyze learner responding and make in-the-moment decisions to maximize learning during the teaching session, ultimately using clinical judgment while using prompting as a teaching strategy. FPF has consistently been demonstrated to be effective and in some cases more efficient than other prompting procedures. However, there has been no research demonstrating effective training procedures for the skills necessary to implement FPF. In order to more widely disseminate procedures that require these analytic skills, effective training procedures must be identified. The current study evaluated the effects of behavioral skills training (BST) and a progressive approach to staff training to teach staff to implement FPF with autistic individuals/individuals with ASD and the effects of each training method on development of clinical judgment skills. The results demonstrated that both training procedures were effective in teaching implementation of FPF.</p>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.2061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality behavior intervention requires critical thinking skills, in-the-moment analysis, flexibility, and clinical judgment. Yet, there has been limited research on developing these complex skills. Flexible prompt fading (FPF) is a prompting procedure that requires the interventionist to continually analyze learner responding and make in-the-moment decisions to maximize learning during the teaching session, ultimately using clinical judgment while using prompting as a teaching strategy. FPF has consistently been demonstrated to be effective and in some cases more efficient than other prompting procedures. However, there has been no research demonstrating effective training procedures for the skills necessary to implement FPF. In order to more widely disseminate procedures that require these analytic skills, effective training procedures must be identified. The current study evaluated the effects of behavioral skills training (BST) and a progressive approach to staff training to teach staff to implement FPF with autistic individuals/individuals with ASD and the effects of each training method on development of clinical judgment skills. The results demonstrated that both training procedures were effective in teaching implementation of FPF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较员工培训程序以传授灵活的提示音消退方法
高质量的行为干预需要批判性思维能力、即时分析能力、灵活性和临床判断能力。然而,关于培养这些复杂技能的研究却十分有限。灵活提示淡化(Flexible prompt fading,FPF)是一种提示程序,它要求干预者在使用提示作为教学策略的同时,不断分析学习者的反应,并做出即时决定,以最大限度地提高教学过程中的学习效果,最终实现临床判断。FPF 一直被证明是有效的,在某些情况下比其他提示程序更有效。然而,目前还没有研究表明对实施 FPF 所需的技能进行有效培训的程序。为了更广泛地推广需要这些分析技巧的程序,必须确定有效的培训程序。本研究评估了行为技能培训(BST)和循序渐进的员工培训方法在教导员工对自闭症患者/孤独症患者实施 FPF 方面的效果,以及每种培训方法对临床判断技能发展的影响。结果表明,这两种培训程序在教授实施 FPF 方面都很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Use of Behavioral Skills Training to Teach Staff Discrete Trial Teaching Examination of Athletes' Preferences for Practice Drills in a Group Response Restriction Analysis Variables Influencing Physical Activity for Children With Developmental Disabilities Who Exhibit Problem Behavior Teaching Reciprocal Tacting to Children With Autism Comparing Similar and Dissimilar Competing Responses for Tic Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1