Benchmarking Cross-Docking Strategies in Kinase Drug Discovery.

IF 5.6 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00905
David A Schaller, Clara D Christ, John D Chodera, Andrea Volkamer
{"title":"Benchmarking Cross-Docking Strategies in Kinase Drug Discovery.","authors":"David A Schaller, Clara D Christ, John D Chodera, Andrea Volkamer","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, machine learning has transformed many aspects of the drug discovery process, including small molecule design, for which the prediction of bioactivity is an integral part. Leveraging structural information about the interactions between a small molecule and its protein target has great potential for downstream machine learning scoring approaches but is fundamentally limited by the accuracy with which protein-ligand complex structures can be predicted in a reliable and automated fashion. With the goal of finding practical approaches to generating useful kinase-inhibitor complex geometries for downstream machine learning scoring approaches, we present a kinase-centric docking benchmark assessing the performance of different classes of docking and pose selection strategies to assess how well experimentally observed binding modes are recapitulated in a realistic cross-docking scenario. The assembled benchmark data set focuses on the well-studied protein kinase family and comprises a subset of 589 protein structures cocrystallized with 423 ATP-competitive ligands. We find that the docking methods biased by the cocrystallized ligand, utilizing shape overlap with or without maximum common substructure matching, are more successful in recovering binding poses than standard physics-based docking alone. Also, docking into multiple structures significantly increases the chance of generating a low root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) docking pose. Docking utilizing an approach that combines all three methods (Posit) into structures with the most similar cocrystallized ligands according to the maximum common substructure (MCS) proved to be the most efficient way to reproduce binding poses, achieving a success rate of 70.4% across all included systems. The studied docking and pose selection strategies, which utilize the OpenEye Toolkits, were implemented into pipelines of the KinoML framework, allowing automated and reliable protein-ligand complex generation for future downstream machine learning tasks. Although focused on protein kinases, we believe that the general findings can also be transferred to other protein families.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, machine learning has transformed many aspects of the drug discovery process, including small molecule design, for which the prediction of bioactivity is an integral part. Leveraging structural information about the interactions between a small molecule and its protein target has great potential for downstream machine learning scoring approaches but is fundamentally limited by the accuracy with which protein-ligand complex structures can be predicted in a reliable and automated fashion. With the goal of finding practical approaches to generating useful kinase-inhibitor complex geometries for downstream machine learning scoring approaches, we present a kinase-centric docking benchmark assessing the performance of different classes of docking and pose selection strategies to assess how well experimentally observed binding modes are recapitulated in a realistic cross-docking scenario. The assembled benchmark data set focuses on the well-studied protein kinase family and comprises a subset of 589 protein structures cocrystallized with 423 ATP-competitive ligands. We find that the docking methods biased by the cocrystallized ligand, utilizing shape overlap with or without maximum common substructure matching, are more successful in recovering binding poses than standard physics-based docking alone. Also, docking into multiple structures significantly increases the chance of generating a low root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) docking pose. Docking utilizing an approach that combines all three methods (Posit) into structures with the most similar cocrystallized ligands according to the maximum common substructure (MCS) proved to be the most efficient way to reproduce binding poses, achieving a success rate of 70.4% across all included systems. The studied docking and pose selection strategies, which utilize the OpenEye Toolkits, were implemented into pipelines of the KinoML framework, allowing automated and reliable protein-ligand complex generation for future downstream machine learning tasks. Although focused on protein kinases, we believe that the general findings can also be transferred to other protein families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以激酶药物发现中的交叉对接策略为基准。
近年来,机器学习改变了药物发现过程的许多方面,包括小分子设计,其中生物活性预测是不可或缺的一部分。利用小分子与其蛋白质靶标之间相互作用的结构信息对下游机器学习评分方法具有巨大的潜力,但从根本上说,这种方法受限于以可靠和自动化的方式预测蛋白质配体复合物结构的准确性。为了找到切实可行的方法为下游机器学习评分方法生成有用的激酶抑制剂复合物几何图形,我们提出了一个以激酶为中心的对接基准,评估不同类别对接和姿势选择策略的性能,以评估在现实交叉对接场景中实验观察到的结合模式的再现程度。所收集的基准数据集侧重于研究得比较透彻的蛋白激酶家族,包括与 423 种 ATP 竞争性配体共结晶的 589 种蛋白质结构子集。我们发现,利用形状重叠与或不利用最大共同子结构匹配,以共晶配体为偏向的对接方法在恢复结合位置方面比单独基于物理的标准对接更为成功。此外,与多种结构对接也大大增加了生成低均值方根偏差(RMSD)对接姿势的机会。根据最大共同子结构(MCS),将所有三种方法(Posit)结合到具有最相似共晶配体的结构中进行对接被证明是重现结合姿态的最有效方法,在所有包含的系统中成功率达到 70.4%。所研究的对接和姿势选择策略利用了 OpenEye 工具包,并将其实施到 KinoML 框架的管道中,从而为未来的下游机器学习任务自动生成可靠的蛋白质配体复合物。虽然研究的重点是蛋白激酶,但我们相信一般研究结果也可以应用于其他蛋白家族。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
529
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery. Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field. As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.
期刊最新文献
Widespread Misinterpretation of pKa Terminology for Zwitterionic Compounds and Its Consequences. Influence of Stereochemistry in a Local Approach for Calculating Protein Conformations. Input Pose is Key to Performance of Free Energy Perturbation: Benchmarking with Monoacylglycerol Lipase. MD-LAIs Software: Computing Whole-Sequence and Amino Acid-Level "Embeddings" for Peptides and Proteins. RankMHC: Learning to Rank Class-I Peptide-MHC Structural Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1