Thermographic and ultrasound assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: can thermography detect subclinical synovitis at the wrist?

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY BMC Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s41927-024-00435-1
York Kiat Tan, Gek Hsiang Lim, Chin Chin Ooi, Voon Chee Ma, Bimal Mayur Kumar Vora
{"title":"Thermographic and ultrasound assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: can thermography detect subclinical synovitis at the wrist?","authors":"York Kiat Tan, Gek Hsiang Lim, Chin Chin Ooi, Voon Chee Ma, Bimal Mayur Kumar Vora","doi":"10.1186/s41927-024-00435-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermography is an emerging imaging modality which allows for a quick and objective measure of joint surface temperature in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, there are no published studies comparing thermography with ultrasonography in the subclinical assessment of joint inflammation at the wrist of patients with RA, and no published data on inter-rater reliability for multiple raters for thermographic assessment at the RA wrist. In our study comparing thermography and ultrasonography at the RA wrist, we aim to determine if thermography can detect subclinical synovitis. Additionally, we performed inter-reliability testing (multiple raters) for both thermography and ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thermographic (average (Tavg), maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures) and ultrasound (total grey-scale (TGS) score and total power Doppler (TPD) scores) parameters were compared between two patient groups: Asymptomatic Group (with non-swollen and non-tender wrists) and Symptomatic Group (with swollen and/or tender wrists). Among Asymptomatic Group patients, thermographic parameters were compared between those with and without wrist joint recess(es) having ultrasound synovitis (PD ≥ 1 or GS ≥ 2); Spearman's correlation and simple linear regression were used to study the relationship between thermographic and ultrasound parameters. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for inter-rater reliability calculation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven RA patients' right wrists were imaged in this cross-sectional study. Thermographic temperatures, TPD and TGS scores were all significantly (p < 0.05) greater among Symptomatic Group versus Asymptomatic Group patients. Among Asymptomatic Group patients, thermographic temperatures were all significantly higher (P < 0.01) in wrists having joint recess(es) with ultrasound PD ≥ 1 or GS ≥ 2, while all thermographic parameters correlated significantly with TPD (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.43 to 0.48, p < 0.001) and TGS (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.33 to 0.37, p < 0.01). The ICC values based on a subset of images obtained for inter-reliability testing were high for thermography (0.994 to 0.998) and ultrasonography (0.933 to 0.952).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Swollen and/or tender RA wrists displayed greater thermographic and ultrasound-detected joint inflammation. At clinically quiescent (non-swollen; non-tender) wrists, thermographic temperatures significantly correlated with ultrasound-detected joint inflammation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"8 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-024-00435-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thermography is an emerging imaging modality which allows for a quick and objective measure of joint surface temperature in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, there are no published studies comparing thermography with ultrasonography in the subclinical assessment of joint inflammation at the wrist of patients with RA, and no published data on inter-rater reliability for multiple raters for thermographic assessment at the RA wrist. In our study comparing thermography and ultrasonography at the RA wrist, we aim to determine if thermography can detect subclinical synovitis. Additionally, we performed inter-reliability testing (multiple raters) for both thermography and ultrasonography.

Methods: Thermographic (average (Tavg), maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures) and ultrasound (total grey-scale (TGS) score and total power Doppler (TPD) scores) parameters were compared between two patient groups: Asymptomatic Group (with non-swollen and non-tender wrists) and Symptomatic Group (with swollen and/or tender wrists). Among Asymptomatic Group patients, thermographic parameters were compared between those with and without wrist joint recess(es) having ultrasound synovitis (PD ≥ 1 or GS ≥ 2); Spearman's correlation and simple linear regression were used to study the relationship between thermographic and ultrasound parameters. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for inter-rater reliability calculation.

Results: Eighty-seven RA patients' right wrists were imaged in this cross-sectional study. Thermographic temperatures, TPD and TGS scores were all significantly (p < 0.05) greater among Symptomatic Group versus Asymptomatic Group patients. Among Asymptomatic Group patients, thermographic temperatures were all significantly higher (P < 0.01) in wrists having joint recess(es) with ultrasound PD ≥ 1 or GS ≥ 2, while all thermographic parameters correlated significantly with TPD (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.43 to 0.48, p < 0.001) and TGS (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.33 to 0.37, p < 0.01). The ICC values based on a subset of images obtained for inter-reliability testing were high for thermography (0.994 to 0.998) and ultrasonography (0.933 to 0.952).

Conclusions: Swollen and/or tender RA wrists displayed greater thermographic and ultrasound-detected joint inflammation. At clinically quiescent (non-swollen; non-tender) wrists, thermographic temperatures significantly correlated with ultrasound-detected joint inflammation.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿性关节炎患者的热成像和超声波评估:热成像能否发现腕部亚临床滑膜炎?
背景:热成像是一种新兴的成像方式,可快速、客观地测量类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的关节表面温度。迄今为止,还没有公开发表的研究比较了热成像和超声波成像对 RA 患者腕部关节炎症的亚临床评估,也没有公开发表的数据显示 RA 腕部热成像评估的多个评分者之间的可靠性。在我们的研究中,我们对 RA 腕部热成像和超声波成像进行了比较,旨在确定热成像能否检测出亚临床滑膜炎。此外,我们还对热成像和超声波成像进行了可靠性测试(多人评分):对两组患者的热成像(平均温度(Tavg)、最高温度(Tmax)和最低温度(Tmin))和超声波(总灰度(TGS)评分和总功率多普勒(TPD)评分)参数进行比较:无症状组(手腕无肿胀、无触痛)和有症状组(手腕肿胀和/或有触痛)。在无症状组患者中,比较了有和没有腕关节凹陷的超声滑膜炎(PD ≥ 1 或 GS ≥ 2)患者的热成像参数;使用斯皮尔曼相关性和简单线性回归来研究热成像参数和超声参数之间的关系。采用类内相关系数(ICC)计算评分者之间的可靠性:这项横断面研究对 87 名 RA 患者的右腕进行了成像。热成像温度、TPD 和 TGS 评分均有显著性差异(p 结论:热成像温度、TPD 和 TGS 评分均有显著性差异:肿胀和/或触痛的 RA 腕部显示出更大的热成像和超声检测关节炎症。在临床静止期(不肿胀、无触痛)的手腕上,热成像温度与超声检测到的关节炎症明显相关:临床试验编号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between osteoprotegerin and RANKL single nucleotide polymorphisms and destructive rhinosinusitis in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Thermographic and ultrasound assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: can thermography detect subclinical synovitis at the wrist? Rheumatoid arthritis and COVID-19 outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Classification of salivary gland biopsies in Sjögren's syndrome by a convolutional neural network using an auto-machine learning platform. Prevalence of co-existing autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases in vitiligo: a survey-based study from Egypt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1