Applicability of Vfrac in men: a qualitative study of an osteoporotic vertebral fracture screening tool for use in older people with back pain

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Archives of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s11657-024-01470-8
Karen L. Barker, Francine Toye, Sarah Drew, Tanzeela Y. Khalid, Emma M. Clark
{"title":"Applicability of Vfrac in men: a qualitative study of an osteoporotic vertebral fracture screening tool for use in older people with back pain","authors":"Karen L. Barker,&nbsp;Francine Toye,&nbsp;Sarah Drew,&nbsp;Tanzeela Y. Khalid,&nbsp;Emma M. Clark","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01470-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Summary</h3><p>The Vfrac clinical screening tool was developed to help primary care healthcare practitioners decide if an older woman with back pain is at high risk of a vertebral fragility fracture (VFF) and requires a spinal radiograph to confirm diagnosis. The Vfrac tool developmental work was carried out in women because of the higher background prevalence of VFF. We now wish to assess Vfrac in men.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To understand and characterise pain symptoms of men with VFF, to evaluate the wording of the Vfrac tool from men’s perspective, and to establish if a gender-specific version of the Vfrac tool was needed.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Individual interviews were conducted with 15 men using an interview topic guide based on the original Vfrac topic guide with the addition of a ‘think aloud’ section to discuss the wording of the current questions within the Vfrac tool. Thematic analysis was conducted by two researchers.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven themes highlight that physical measurements can be potentially upsetting for those being measured (‘Weighed, measured and found wanting’), that closed questions cannot capture the complexity of experience (there is no room on the paper; pain is dynamic, not static; walking can make it better or worse; well, it depends on which chair), and that gendered roles are varied and dynamic (I try to do my share of domestic work; no more do-it-yourself).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This research has allowed the male perspective of osteoporosis to be heard and importantly identified that the Vfrac tool had no gender-specific barriers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11657-024-01470-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01470-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

The Vfrac clinical screening tool was developed to help primary care healthcare practitioners decide if an older woman with back pain is at high risk of a vertebral fragility fracture (VFF) and requires a spinal radiograph to confirm diagnosis. The Vfrac tool developmental work was carried out in women because of the higher background prevalence of VFF. We now wish to assess Vfrac in men.

Purpose

To understand and characterise pain symptoms of men with VFF, to evaluate the wording of the Vfrac tool from men’s perspective, and to establish if a gender-specific version of the Vfrac tool was needed.

Methods

Individual interviews were conducted with 15 men using an interview topic guide based on the original Vfrac topic guide with the addition of a ‘think aloud’ section to discuss the wording of the current questions within the Vfrac tool. Thematic analysis was conducted by two researchers.

Results

Seven themes highlight that physical measurements can be potentially upsetting for those being measured (‘Weighed, measured and found wanting’), that closed questions cannot capture the complexity of experience (there is no room on the paper; pain is dynamic, not static; walking can make it better or worse; well, it depends on which chair), and that gendered roles are varied and dynamic (I try to do my share of domestic work; no more do-it-yourself).

Conclusions

This research has allowed the male perspective of osteoporosis to be heard and importantly identified that the Vfrac tool had no gender-specific barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vfrac 在男性中的适用性:对用于背痛老年人的骨质疏松性脊椎骨折筛查工具的定性研究。
开发 Vfrac 临床筛查工具的目的是帮助初级保健从业人员判断一名背部疼痛的老年妇女是否具有椎体脆性骨折 (VFF) 的高风险,是否需要进行脊柱放射摄影以确诊。由于 VFF 的背景发病率较高,因此 Vfrac 工具的开发工作是在女性中进行的。目的:了解并描述患有 VFF 的男性的疼痛症状,从男性的角度评估 Vfrac 工具的措辞,并确定是否需要针对不同性别的 Vfrac 工具版本:方法:使用基于原始 Vfrac 主题指南的访谈主题指南对 15 名男性进行了个别访谈,并增加了一个 "大声思考 "部分,以讨论 Vfrac 工具中当前问题的措辞。两位研究人员进行了主题分析:七个主题强调了身体测量可能会让被测量者感到不安("称重、测量并发现不足"),封闭式问题无法捕捉经验的复杂性(纸上没有空间;疼痛是动态的,而不是静态的;走路可能会让情况变得更好或更糟;嗯,这取决于哪把椅子),以及性别角色是多样且动态的(我努力做我分内的家务活;不再自己动手做):这项研究让人们听到了男性对骨质疏松症的看法,重要的是发现 Vfrac 工具没有性别障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
期刊最新文献
Effects of isoflavone interventions on bone turnover markers and factors regulating bone metabolism in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Correction: Acquired hypophosphatemic osteomalacia: case series from a Peruvian referral center (1999–2023) Correction: Bilateral lumbar pedicle fracture in a patient receiving long-term bisphosphonate therapy: a case report with pathological evaluation Efficacy and safety of weekly liquid alendronate in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a 12-month, multi-center, randomized trial Correction: Efficacy and safety of teriparatide vs. bisphosphonates and denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in osteoporosis not previously treated with bisphosphonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1