Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction Is Associated With Reduced Airway Complications After Lung Transplantation

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70029
Kentaro Noda, Mohamed-Ali H. Jawad-Makki, Ernest G. Chan, John Ryan, Masashi Furukawa, Chadi A. Hage, Pablo G. Sanchez
{"title":"Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction Is Associated With Reduced Airway Complications After Lung Transplantation","authors":"Kentaro Noda,&nbsp;Mohamed-Ali H. Jawad-Makki,&nbsp;Ernest G. Chan,&nbsp;John Ryan,&nbsp;Masashi Furukawa,&nbsp;Chadi A. Hage,&nbsp;Pablo G. Sanchez","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Early utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) improves the clinical outcomes of patients with severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3) after lung transplantation. Although there is a survival benefit, the impact of ECMO on airway complications has not been investigated. This study aims to describe the clinical association between posttransplant methods of support and the severity of acute airway anastomosis complications in patients with PGD3 following bilateral lung transplantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from adult bilateral lung transplant patients diagnosed with PGD3 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Bronchial anastomosis necrosis (ischemia reperfusion injury [IRI]) that developed within a month after transplantation was graded. The data were compared among the groups of veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) (<i>n</i> = 77), veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) (<i>n</i> = 14), and mechanical ventilation (MV, <i>n</i> = 33).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Higher levels of support (VV/VA-ECMO) were associated with a lower incidence of PGD3, which was highest in recipients on MV only (<i>M</i><sup>2</sup> = 19.54, <i>r</i> = −0.41, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In a multivariable competing risk analysis, VV-ECMO was protective against chronic allograft dysfunction (CLAD) relative to the MV group (HR: 0.36 [0.13–0.96], <i>p</i> = 0.042). There was no relationship between posttransplant support and survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggests posttransplant VV-ECMO support in patients who develop PGD3 may confer a protective advantage over MV alone in the prevention of ischemic reperfusion injury. VV-ECMO was associated with lower IRI grades and lower rates of BOS after transplantation. Future studies investigating the causal mechanisms are warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) improves the clinical outcomes of patients with severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3) after lung transplantation. Although there is a survival benefit, the impact of ECMO on airway complications has not been investigated. This study aims to describe the clinical association between posttransplant methods of support and the severity of acute airway anastomosis complications in patients with PGD3 following bilateral lung transplantation.

Methods

Data from adult bilateral lung transplant patients diagnosed with PGD3 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Bronchial anastomosis necrosis (ischemia reperfusion injury [IRI]) that developed within a month after transplantation was graded. The data were compared among the groups of veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) (n = 77), veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) (n = 14), and mechanical ventilation (MV, n = 33).

Results

Higher levels of support (VV/VA-ECMO) were associated with a lower incidence of PGD3, which was highest in recipients on MV only (M2 = 19.54, r = −0.41, p < 0.001). In a multivariable competing risk analysis, VV-ECMO was protective against chronic allograft dysfunction (CLAD) relative to the MV group (HR: 0.36 [0.13–0.96], p = 0.042). There was no relationship between posttransplant support and survival.

Conclusion

This study suggests posttransplant VV-ECMO support in patients who develop PGD3 may confer a protective advantage over MV alone in the prevention of ischemic reperfusion injury. VV-ECMO was associated with lower IRI grades and lower rates of BOS after transplantation. Future studies investigating the causal mechanisms are warranted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉体外膜氧合支持治疗严重的原发性移植物功能障碍与肺移植术后气道并发症的减少有关。
背景:早期使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)可改善肺移植术后严重原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD3)患者的临床疗效。虽然 ECMO 有助于患者生存,但其对气道并发症的影响尚未得到研究。本研究旨在描述双肺移植后 PGD3 患者移植后支持方法与急性气道吻合并发症严重程度之间的临床关联:方法:对本院确诊为PGD3的成人双肺移植患者的数据进行回顾性研究。对移植后一个月内发生的支气管吻合口坏死(缺血再灌注损伤 [IRI])进行分级。数据在静脉-静脉 ECMO(VV-ECMO)(77 人)、静脉-动脉 ECMO(VA-ECMO)(14 人)和机械通气(MV,33 人)组之间进行了比较:结果:较高水平的支持(VV/VA-ECMO)与较低的 PGD3 发生率相关,仅使用 MV 的受者中 PGD3 发生率最高(M2 = 19.54,r = -0.41,p 结论:该研究表明,移植后静脉-动脉 ECMO(VA-ECMO)和机械通气(MV,n = 33)可降低 PGD3 的发生率:本研究表明,在预防缺血再灌注损伤方面,对出现 PGD3 的患者进行移植后 VV-ECMO 支持可能比单纯 MV 更具有保护性优势。VV-ECMO与移植后较低的IRI分级和较低的BOS率有关。未来有必要对其因果机制进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Flying Kidneys or Flying Donors: What Do Prior Canadian Living Kidney Donors Think? Individual Association of Predicted Left and Right Ventricular Mass Ratios With Survival After Heart Transplantation: A UNOS Database Analysis Liver Transplant Fast-Track With an Emphasis on Reduced Delirium: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Reducing Length of Stay Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study Is Survival Impacted by One or Several Successive Cancers After Liver Transplantation? A French National Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1