Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.018
Kyong Joo Lee, Eunae Cho, Da Hae Park, Hye Won Cha, Dong Hee Koh, Jin Lee, Chan Hyuk Park, Se Woo Park
{"title":"Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study.","authors":"Kyong Joo Lee, Eunae Cho, Da Hae Park, Hye Won Cha, Dong Hee Koh, Jin Lee, Chan Hyuk Park, Se Woo Park","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Difficult biliary cannulation is an independent risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP); however, there is a noticeable lack of studies focusing on the incidence and risk factors of PEP among patients undergoing easy cannulation. Therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate the risk factors for PEP in patients who underwent easy cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled patients with naïve major papillae who underwent diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP between June 2018 and June 2023. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence of PEP in patients with easy cannulation; the secondary endpoints included identifying PEP risk factors and evaluating procedure-related adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1,930 patients were included, with 1,061 (54.9%) undergoing easy cannulation. Within this cohort, PEP incidence was 3.0%, whereas 2.9% experienced procedure-related AEs, excluding PEP. A history of acute pancreatitis (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.75 [1.83-20.14], P=0.001) and acute cholangitis upon admission (OR [95% CI]: 2.25 [1.07-5.08], P=0.039) were identified as independent risk factors for PEP in patients with easy cannulation. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and biliary stent placement were independent factors for procedure-related AEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the importance of assessing patient- and procedure-related factors to mitigate the risk of PEP in patients undergoing easy cannulation. Despite the low incidence of PEP, the potential for the occurrence of severe cases emphasizes the need for cautious intervention, particularly in patients with a history of acute pancreatitis and acute cholangitis upon admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Difficult biliary cannulation is an independent risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP); however, there is a noticeable lack of studies focusing on the incidence and risk factors of PEP among patients undergoing easy cannulation. Therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate the risk factors for PEP in patients who underwent easy cannulation.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with naïve major papillae who underwent diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP between June 2018 and June 2023. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence of PEP in patients with easy cannulation; the secondary endpoints included identifying PEP risk factors and evaluating procedure-related adverse events (AEs).

Results: Overall, 1,930 patients were included, with 1,061 (54.9%) undergoing easy cannulation. Within this cohort, PEP incidence was 3.0%, whereas 2.9% experienced procedure-related AEs, excluding PEP. A history of acute pancreatitis (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.75 [1.83-20.14], P=0.001) and acute cholangitis upon admission (OR [95% CI]: 2.25 [1.07-5.08], P=0.039) were identified as independent risk factors for PEP in patients with easy cannulation. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and biliary stent placement were independent factors for procedure-related AEs.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of assessing patient- and procedure-related factors to mitigate the risk of PEP in patients undergoing easy cannulation. Despite the low incidence of PEP, the potential for the occurrence of severe cases emphasizes the need for cautious intervention, particularly in patients with a history of acute pancreatitis and acute cholangitis upon admission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定易插管患者发生ERCP术后胰腺炎的相关风险因素:前瞻性多中心观察研究。
背景和目的:胆道插管困难是内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后胰腺炎(PEP)的一个独立风险因素;然而,目前明显缺乏针对接受简易插管的患者中 PEP 发生率和风险因素的研究。因此,我们旨在系统地研究接受简易插管的患者发生 PEP 的风险因素:我们前瞻性地招募了在 2018 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间接受诊断性或治疗性 ERCP 的天真大乳头患者。主要终点是确定易插管患者的 PEP 发生率;次要终点包括确定 PEP 风险因素和评估与手术相关的不良事件(AEs):共纳入 1,930 名患者,其中 1,061 人(54.9%)进行了简易插管。在这组患者中,PEP发生率为3.0%,而2.9%的患者发生了手术相关的不良事件,不包括PEP。急性胰腺炎病史(比值比 [OR] 95% 置信区间 [CI]:6.75 [1.83-20.14],P=0.001)和入院时急性胆管炎(比值比 [OR] 95% 置信区间 [CI]:2.25 [1.07-5.08],P=0.039)被确定为易插管患者发生 PEP 的独立风险因素。内镜括约肌切开术和胆道支架置入术是导致手术相关AEs的独立因素:我们的研究结果强调了评估患者和手术相关因素以降低易插管患者 PEP 风险的重要性。尽管PEP的发生率较低,但发生严重病例的可能性强调了谨慎干预的必要性,尤其是入院时有急性胰腺炎和急性胆管炎病史的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer. Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study. Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study. Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1