Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety between D-TACE + HAIC + lenvatinib and D-TACE + lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13179-5
Haohao Lu, Bin Liang, Chuansheng Zheng, Xiangwen Xia
{"title":"Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety between D-TACE + HAIC + lenvatinib and D-TACE + lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Haohao Lu, Bin Liang, Chuansheng Zheng, Xiangwen Xia","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13179-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib in patients with massive hepatocellular carcinoma, with the goal of providing a safer and more effective therapeutic strategy for individuals suffering from massive hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data from 118 patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent treatment at the Interventional Department of Wuhan Union Hospital between June 2018 and December 2021. Based on the treatment approach, the patients were divided into two groups: the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group (N = 54) and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (N = 64). The primary study endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups. Additionally, the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events in both groups was considered as a secondary study endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the treatment, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR compared to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (68.5% vs. 43.8%, 90.7% vs. 73.4%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group demonstrated longer mPFS and mOS in comparison to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (8.6 months vs. 6.6 months, P = 0.005; 19.5 months vs. 14.1 months, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of common treatment-related adverse events between the TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy and safety in managing unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma. This combination therapy may serve as a viable option for improving the prognosis of patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13179-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib in patients with massive hepatocellular carcinoma, with the goal of providing a safer and more effective therapeutic strategy for individuals suffering from massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data from 118 patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent treatment at the Interventional Department of Wuhan Union Hospital between June 2018 and December 2021. Based on the treatment approach, the patients were divided into two groups: the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group (N = 54) and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (N = 64). The primary study endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups. Additionally, the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events in both groups was considered as a secondary study endpoint.

Results: Following the treatment, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR compared to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (68.5% vs. 43.8%, 90.7% vs. 73.4%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group demonstrated longer mPFS and mOS in comparison to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (8.6 months vs. 6.6 months, P = 0.005; 19.5 months vs. 14.1 months, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of common treatment-related adverse events between the TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy and safety in managing unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma. This combination therapy may serve as a viable option for improving the prognosis of patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
D-TACE+HAIC+来伐替尼与D-TACE+来伐替尼治疗不可切除的巨大肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性比较分析
研究目的本研究旨在探讨D-TACE、HAIC和仑伐替尼联合治疗方案在巨大肝细胞癌患者中的疗效和安全性,旨在为巨大肝细胞癌患者提供更安全有效的治疗策略:利用2018年6月至2021年12月期间在武汉协和医院介入科接受治疗的118例无法切除的巨大肝细胞癌患者的临床数据进行回顾性分析。根据治疗方法,患者被分为两组:D-TACE+HAIC+伦伐替尼组(N=54)和D-TACE+伦伐替尼组(N=64)。主要研究终点包括两组患者的客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。此外,两组的治疗相关不良事件发生率也被视为次要研究终点:结果:治疗后,D-TACE+HAIC+伦伐替尼组的ORR和DCR明显高于D-TACE+伦伐替尼组(68.5% vs. 43.8%,90.7% vs. 73.4%,P 0.05):结论:D-TACE、HAIC和仑伐替尼的联合治疗方案在治疗不可切除的巨大肝细胞癌方面显示出卓越的疗效和安全性。这种联合疗法可作为改善不可切除大块肝细胞癌患者预后的可行方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Cerebrospinal fluid IL-6 and IL-10 as promising diagnostic and therapeutic prognostic biomarkers for secondary central nervous system lymphoma. Prospective study on the association between 36 human blood cell traits and pan-cancer outcomes: a mendelian randomization analysis. Relevant factors for policy concerning comprehensive genomic profiling in oncology: stakeholder perspectives. Roles of the lncRNAs MEG3, PVT1 and H19 tagSNPs in gastric cancer susceptibility. The complexity of needs and roles of family members during breast cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1