Effects of resistance training vs high intensity interval training on body composition, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and quality of life in survivors of breast cancer: a randomized trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07559-5
Francesco Bettariga, Dennis R Taaffe, Cristina Crespo-Garcia, Timothy D Clay, Daniel A Galvão, Robert U Newton
{"title":"Effects of resistance training vs high intensity interval training on body composition, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and quality of life in survivors of breast cancer: a randomized trial.","authors":"Francesco Bettariga, Dennis R Taaffe, Cristina Crespo-Garcia, Timothy D Clay, Daniel A Galvão, Robert U Newton","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07559-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer treatments often lead to unfavourable changes in body composition, physical fitness, and quality of life (QoL). We compared the effects of resistance training (RT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on these outcomes in survivors of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight survivors of breast cancer, post-treatment (Stage I-III), aged 55.5 ± 8.8 years and body mass index 27.9 ± 5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were randomly allocated to a 12-week supervised RT (n = 14) or HIIT (n = 14) intervention, 3 days per week. Body composition (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry), upper and lower body muscle strength (1-repetition maximum), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) (Ekblom Bak Cycle Test), and QoL domains (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR45) were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. Exercise attendance ranged from 81 to 85%. Between groups, there were significant differences (p ≤ 0.001) after 12 weeks in chest press strength for RT (mean difference [MD] = 4.7 kg) and CRF for HIIT (MD = 1.9 ml/min/kg). Within groups, there were significant improvements (p < 0.05) for % lean mass and % fat mass in both RT and HIIT, as well as for upper and lower body muscle strength, CRF, and QoL domains. No major adverse events were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both exercise groups improved body composition, physical fitness, and QoL domains over 12 weeks of RT or HIIT, although mode-specific benefits were apparent with more substantial improvements in lean mass and muscle strength with RT and reductions in % fat mass and improved CRF with HIIT. Tailored exercise programs should address the specific health needs of each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"261-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07559-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer treatments often lead to unfavourable changes in body composition, physical fitness, and quality of life (QoL). We compared the effects of resistance training (RT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on these outcomes in survivors of breast cancer.

Methods: Twenty-eight survivors of breast cancer, post-treatment (Stage I-III), aged 55.5 ± 8.8 years and body mass index 27.9 ± 5 kg/m2 were randomly allocated to a 12-week supervised RT (n = 14) or HIIT (n = 14) intervention, 3 days per week. Body composition (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry), upper and lower body muscle strength (1-repetition maximum), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) (Ekblom Bak Cycle Test), and QoL domains (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR45) were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks.

Results: There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. Exercise attendance ranged from 81 to 85%. Between groups, there were significant differences (p ≤ 0.001) after 12 weeks in chest press strength for RT (mean difference [MD] = 4.7 kg) and CRF for HIIT (MD = 1.9 ml/min/kg). Within groups, there were significant improvements (p < 0.05) for % lean mass and % fat mass in both RT and HIIT, as well as for upper and lower body muscle strength, CRF, and QoL domains. No major adverse events were noted.

Conclusion: Both exercise groups improved body composition, physical fitness, and QoL domains over 12 weeks of RT or HIIT, although mode-specific benefits were apparent with more substantial improvements in lean mass and muscle strength with RT and reductions in % fat mass and improved CRF with HIIT. Tailored exercise programs should address the specific health needs of each patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻力训练与高强度间歇训练对乳腺癌幸存者身体成分、肌肉力量、心肺功能和生活质量的影响:随机试验。
目的:乳腺癌治疗通常会导致身体成分、体能和生活质量(QoL)发生不利变化。我们比较了阻力训练(RT)和高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对乳腺癌幸存者这些结果的影响:28名乳腺癌治疗后(I-III期)幸存者,年龄(55.5 ± 8.8)岁,体重指数(27.9 ± 5 kg/m2)被随机分配到为期12周的RT(14人)或HIIT(14人)干预训练中,每周3天。在基线和 12 周时对身体成分(双能 X 射线吸收测量法)、上半身和下半身肌肉力量(1 次重复最大值)、心肺功能(CRF)(Ekblom Bak 循环测试)和 QoL 领域(EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EORTC QLQ-BR45)进行评估:结果:基线时各组间无明显差异。运动出席率从 81% 到 85% 不等。12 周后,RT 的胸外按压力量(平均差 [MD] = 4.7 千克)和 HIIT 的 CRF(平均差 = 1.9 毫升/分钟/千克)在组间存在显著差异(p ≤ 0.001)。在各组内,均有明显改善(p 结论:两组均改善了身体成分、体能和运动能力:在为期 12 周的 RT 或 HIIT 运动中,两个运动组都改善了身体成分、体能和 QoL 领域,但特定运动模式的益处也很明显,RT 对瘦体重和肌肉力量的改善更大,而 HIIT 则降低了脂肪含量并改善了 CRF。量身定制的运动计划应满足每位患者的特定健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Real-world second- and third-line progression-free survival after progression on first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer by PAM50 intrinsic subtype: the SOLTI-1801 CDK-PREDICT study. Effect of a supervised intermittent exercise program on insomnia in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Baseline and early postoperative bioimpedance spectroscopy and perometry measurements in patients treated for breast cancer: insights from a prospective screening program. Ovarian function suppression decision-making and uptake in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a mixed methods analysis. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1