Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and patient-reported outcomes in symptom management trials for women with breast cancer.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07523-3
Riha Vaidya, Cathee Till, N Lynn Henry, Michael J Fisch, Dawn L Hershman, Joseph M Unger
{"title":"Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and patient-reported outcomes in symptom management trials for women with breast cancer.","authors":"Riha Vaidya, Cathee Till, N Lynn Henry, Michael J Fisch, Dawn L Hershman, Joseph M Unger","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07523-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation (NSD) is associated with worse outcomes among patients with cancer, but little is known about NSD-related disparities in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in clinical trials. We examined the relationship between PROs and NSD in symptom management trials among women with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We pooled data from three SWOG randomized trials to examine four outcomes: physical and functional wellbeing (PWB, FWB), average pain, and pain interference. NSD was measured using participants' zip code linked to the area deprivation index (ADI) score, categorized into tertiles. Multivariable linear regression adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was used to analyze baseline PROs. Linear mixed models were used to examine if trajectory of PROs from baseline through 24 weeks varied by ADI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We examined 761 participants, of whom 51% were from least deprived neighborhoods. Participants in the most deprived neighborhoods had worse average pain at baseline (β = .38, 95% CI = .03 to .72, p = .03) while participants in somewhat deprived areas also had worse FWB (β = -1.07, 95% CI = -1.95 to -.20, p = .02) and pain interference (β = 0.42, 95% CI = .09 to .75, p = .01) compared to those from least deprived areas. Hispanic ethnicity and having Medicaid/no insurance were associated with worse outcomes. After adjusting for baseline score, ADI was not associated with any outcome over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breast cancer patients living in areas with NSD had worse FWB, joint pain, and pain interference at baseline. Clinical trial participants should be screened for community-level needs. Implementing interventions to address those needs could help mitigate disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"603-611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07523-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation (NSD) is associated with worse outcomes among patients with cancer, but little is known about NSD-related disparities in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in clinical trials. We examined the relationship between PROs and NSD in symptom management trials among women with breast cancer.

Methods: We pooled data from three SWOG randomized trials to examine four outcomes: physical and functional wellbeing (PWB, FWB), average pain, and pain interference. NSD was measured using participants' zip code linked to the area deprivation index (ADI) score, categorized into tertiles. Multivariable linear regression adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was used to analyze baseline PROs. Linear mixed models were used to examine if trajectory of PROs from baseline through 24 weeks varied by ADI.

Results: We examined 761 participants, of whom 51% were from least deprived neighborhoods. Participants in the most deprived neighborhoods had worse average pain at baseline (β = .38, 95% CI = .03 to .72, p = .03) while participants in somewhat deprived areas also had worse FWB (β = -1.07, 95% CI = -1.95 to -.20, p = .02) and pain interference (β = 0.42, 95% CI = .09 to .75, p = .01) compared to those from least deprived areas. Hispanic ethnicity and having Medicaid/no insurance were associated with worse outcomes. After adjusting for baseline score, ADI was not associated with any outcome over time.

Conclusions: Breast cancer patients living in areas with NSD had worse FWB, joint pain, and pain interference at baseline. Clinical trial participants should be screened for community-level needs. Implementing interventions to address those needs could help mitigate disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌妇女症状管理试验中的邻里社会经济贫困和患者报告结果。
目的:邻里社会经济贫困(NSD)与癌症患者较差的预后有关,但临床试验中患者报告的预后(PRO)与 NSD 相关的差异却鲜为人知。我们研究了乳腺癌女性患者症状管理试验中患者报告结果与 NSD 之间的关系:我们汇集了三项 SWOG 随机试验的数据,研究了四项结果:身体和功能健康(PWB、FWB)、平均疼痛和疼痛干扰。NSD采用与地区贫困指数(ADI)分值相关联的参与者邮政编码进行测量,并分为三等分。根据社会人口学和临床特征调整后的多变量线性回归用于分析基线PROs。线性混合模型用于研究从基线到 24 周的 PROs 变化轨迹是否因 ADI 而异:我们研究了 761 名参与者,其中 51% 来自最贫困的社区。与来自最贫困地区的参与者相比,来自最贫困地区的参与者在基线时的平均疼痛感更差(β = .38,95% CI = .03 至 .72,p = .03),而来自稍贫困地区的参与者的FWB(β = -1.07,95% CI = -1.95 至 -.20,p = .02)和疼痛干扰(β = 0.42,95% CI = .09 至 .75,p = .01)也更差。西班牙裔和有医疗补助/无保险与较差的结果有关。在对基线得分进行调整后,随着时间的推移,ADI与任何结果都无关:结论:生活在NSD地区的乳腺癌患者在基线时的FWB、关节疼痛和疼痛干扰较差。临床试验参与者应接受社区需求筛查。实施干预措施以满足这些需求有助于减少差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Genetic counseling referral rates and genetic testing outcomes in women with young breast cancer: a 20-year Canadian review. Preferences of patients with high-risk HR + /HER2- breast cancer for adjuvant endocrine treatment: an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis study from Germany. Radar reflectors for marking of target lymph nodes in initially node-positive patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-a subgroup analysis of the prospective AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) trial. The regulation mechanism of perceived stress on cognitive function of patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a multiple mediation analysis. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy: a large-scale data analysis using the Japanese claims database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1