How to prevent and how to treat dyspnea in critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001232
Gabriel Kemoun, Alexandre Demoule, Maxens Decavèle
{"title":"How to prevent and how to treat dyspnea in critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation.","authors":"Gabriel Kemoun, Alexandre Demoule, Maxens Decavèle","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize current data regarding the prevalence, risk factors, consequences, assessment and treatment of dyspnea in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>In intubated patients, dyspnea is frequent, perceived as intense, and associated with unfavorable outcomes such as immediate and unbearable distress (e.g. fear of dying), prolonged weaning, and delayed severe psychological consequences ( i.e. posttraumatic stress disorders). In noncommunicative patients, dyspnea is named respiratory-related brain suffering (RRBS) and can be detected using dyspnea observations scales. Before initiating pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological interventions may be tried as they are efficient to alleviate dyspnea.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>As opposed to pain, dyspnea has often been overlooked in terms of detection and management, resulting in its significant underestimation in daily practice. When it is diagnosed, dyspnea can be relieved through straightforward interventions, such as adjusting ventilator settings. Assessing dyspnea in patients undergoing invasive mechanically ventilated may be challenging, especially in noncommunicative patients (RRBS). Implementing a systematic dyspnea assessment in routine, akin to pain, could serve as a first step to reduce RRBS and prevent potential severe psychological consequences. In addition to pharmacological treatments like opioids, a promising approach is to modulate both the sensory (air on the face, trigeminal nerve stimulation) and the affective (relaxing music, hypnosis, directed empathy) components of dyspnea.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To summarize current data regarding the prevalence, risk factors, consequences, assessment and treatment of dyspnea in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.

Recent findings: In intubated patients, dyspnea is frequent, perceived as intense, and associated with unfavorable outcomes such as immediate and unbearable distress (e.g. fear of dying), prolonged weaning, and delayed severe psychological consequences ( i.e. posttraumatic stress disorders). In noncommunicative patients, dyspnea is named respiratory-related brain suffering (RRBS) and can be detected using dyspnea observations scales. Before initiating pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological interventions may be tried as they are efficient to alleviate dyspnea.

Summary: As opposed to pain, dyspnea has often been overlooked in terms of detection and management, resulting in its significant underestimation in daily practice. When it is diagnosed, dyspnea can be relieved through straightforward interventions, such as adjusting ventilator settings. Assessing dyspnea in patients undergoing invasive mechanically ventilated may be challenging, especially in noncommunicative patients (RRBS). Implementing a systematic dyspnea assessment in routine, akin to pain, could serve as a first step to reduce RRBS and prevent potential severe psychological consequences. In addition to pharmacological treatments like opioids, a promising approach is to modulate both the sensory (air on the face, trigeminal nerve stimulation) and the affective (relaxing music, hypnosis, directed empathy) components of dyspnea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何预防和治疗接受有创机械通气的重症患者的呼吸困难。
综述目的:总结目前有关接受有创机械通气的重症患者呼吸困难的发生率、风险因素、后果、评估和治疗的数据:在插管患者中,呼吸困难很常见,被认为很严重,并与不良后果相关,如直接和难以忍受的痛苦(如对死亡的恐惧)、断气时间延长和延迟的严重心理后果(如创伤后应激障碍)。在无交流能力的患者中,呼吸困难被命名为呼吸相关脑痛苦(RRBS),可通过呼吸困难观察量表检测出来。摘要:与疼痛相比,呼吸困难在检测和管理方面经常被忽视,导致其在日常实践中被严重低估。一旦确诊,呼吸困难可通过简单的干预措施(如调整呼吸机设置)得到缓解。对接受侵入性机械通气的患者进行呼吸困难评估可能具有挑战性,尤其是对于不善交流的患者(RRBS)。在日常工作中实施系统的呼吸困难评估(类似于疼痛评估)可作为减少 RRBS 的第一步,并防止潜在的严重心理后果。除了阿片类药物等药物治疗外,一种很有前景的方法是调节呼吸困难的感觉(脸部吹气、三叉神经刺激)和情感(放松音乐、催眠、引导移情)因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Does patient-ventilator asynchrony really matter? Monitoring and modulating respiratory drive in mechanically ventilated patients. Spontaneous breathing trials: how and for how long? How to prevent postextubation respiratory failure. Management of sedation during weaning from mechanical ventilation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1