Quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.024
Khushboo Gala MBBS , June Tome MD , Mary Krall MS , Devin Tian BS , John B. League BS , Eric J. Vargas MD, MS , Darrell S. Pardi MD , Amanda M. Johnson MD , Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu MBBS
{"title":"Quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists","authors":"Khushboo Gala MBBS ,&nbsp;June Tome MD ,&nbsp;Mary Krall MS ,&nbsp;Devin Tian BS ,&nbsp;John B. League BS ,&nbsp;Eric J. Vargas MD, MS ,&nbsp;Darrell S. Pardi MD ,&nbsp;Amanda M. Johnson MD ,&nbsp;Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>We aimed to assess the quality of bowel preparation in a matched cohort of patients actively using and not using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in a large health system in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing colonoscopy in 22 endoscopy units across 18 sites in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our cohort comprised 6235 patients (3344 case patients and 2891 control patients). Baseline variables causing suboptimal bowel preparation were setting of procedure (inpatient), sex (male), body mass index (higher), type 2 diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease, opioid medications, heart failure, and cirrhosis. Total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale was significantly higher in control patients even after controlling for the mentioned variables (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Case patients were significantly more likely to meet the definition of inadequate bowel preparation. There was no significant difference between different classes of GLP-1 RAs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients using GLP-1 RAs are more likely to have inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy, even accounting for other comorbidities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 5","pages":"Pages 1068-1072.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724037349","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

We aimed to assess the quality of bowel preparation in a matched cohort of patients actively using and not using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in a large health system in the United States.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing colonoscopy in 22 endoscopy units across 18 sites in the United States.

Results

Our cohort comprised 6235 patients (3344 case patients and 2891 control patients). Baseline variables causing suboptimal bowel preparation were setting of procedure (inpatient), sex (male), body mass index (higher), type 2 diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease, opioid medications, heart failure, and cirrhosis. Total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale was significantly higher in control patients even after controlling for the mentioned variables (P < .01). Case patients were significantly more likely to meet the definition of inadequate bowel preparation. There was no significant difference between different classes of GLP-1 RAs.

Conclusions

Patients using GLP-1 RAs are more likely to have inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy, even accounting for other comorbidities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂患者结肠镜检查前的肠道准备质量。
背景与目的我们旨在评估美国一个大型医疗系统中积极使用和未使用 GLP-1 RAs 的匹配队列患者的肠道准备质量:我们对在美国 18 个医疗机构的 22 个内镜室接受结肠镜检查的成年患者进行了回顾性研究:我们的队列包括 6235 名患者(3344 例病例和 2891 例对照)。导致肠道准备不足的基线变量包括手术环境(住院病人)、性别(男性)、体重指数(较高)、T2D、IBD、阿片类药物、心力衰竭和肝硬化。即使控制了上述变量,对照组的 BBPS 总值仍明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)。病例更有可能符合肠道准备不足的定义。不同类别的GLP-1 RAs之间没有明显差异:结论:即使考虑到其他合并症,使用 GLP-1 RAs 的患者在结肠镜检查期间更有可能出现肠道准备不足的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Prophylactic clipping versus no clipping after endoscopic mucosal resection of large nonpedunculated colon polyps: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clinical characteristics analysis of anorectal function changes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal lesions. Risk factors of bleeding ulceration after argon plasma coagulation in patients with radiation-associated vascular ectasias. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual neoplasia after incomplete resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a large multicenter propensity match study (with video). Clinical impact of combination of lesion-border findings and pit patterns for identifying invasive versus noninvasive neoplastic lesions in ulcerative colitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1