Hand Burn Injuries and Occupational Impairment: A Study on the Impact of Burn Injuries on Return-to-Work Outcomes from the Burn Model System research program.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae203
Nikhitha Thrikutam, Charles M Kopp, Caitlin Orton, Alyssa M Bamer, Jeffrey C Schneider, Kyra Solis-Beach, Lewis E Kazis, Haig A Yenikomshian, Karen Kowalske, Barclay T Stewart
{"title":"Hand Burn Injuries and Occupational Impairment: A Study on the Impact of Burn Injuries on Return-to-Work Outcomes from the Burn Model System research program.","authors":"Nikhitha Thrikutam, Charles M Kopp, Caitlin Orton, Alyssa M Bamer, Jeffrey C Schneider, Kyra Solis-Beach, Lewis E Kazis, Haig A Yenikomshian, Karen Kowalske, Barclay T Stewart","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Return to work (RTW) after burn injury is dependent on many variables, including type and location of burn injury, access to care, and pre-injury mental and physical health. Noting that prior studies were limited by small sample sizes, we aimed to use a large database to explore the associations between hand burn severity, functional hand outcomes, and RTW post-injury. Data from a multicenter longitudinal study were analyzed. Adults with burn injuries were classified into 6 groups ranking in severity of hand injury: (0) no hand burns, (1) single hand burn no grafting, (2) bilateral hand burn no grafting, (3) single hand burn requiring grafting, (4) bilateral hand burn requiring unilateral graft, (5) bilateral hand burn requiring bilateral grafts. Grafting was used as a proxy for burn severity. Self-reported employment status, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) scores and reported request for work accommodations were collected at discharge, 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-injury. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Tukey Test were completed to examine differences in outcomes by hand injury severity. A total of 4,621 participants met inclusion criteria. Group 5, those with most severe burns, had significantly longer RTW times than Groups 0-3 (p< 0.005). Group 5's (bilateral burn/unilateral graft) average RTW was greater, however not significantly, compared to group 4. At 6 months, the mean PROMIS UE scores for grafted groups (Group 3, 40.6; Group 5, 35.4) were significantly worse than non-grafted groups (Group 1, 46.8; Group 2, 45.0; (p< 0.0001). At 12 and 24 months, mean PROMIS UE scores were worse for grafted groups, though differences were no longer significant compared to non-grafted groups. At every time point, the majority of respondents did not request accommodations for their injuries from their employers, regardless of severity. Burn severity plays a significant role in both RTW and hand function for participants with hand burns. Additionally, the lack of correlation between burn severity and request for work accommodations hints at the baseline vulnerability of these populations. These findings suggest a need for systematic improvements in the way these patients are cared for and re-integrated into the workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Return to work (RTW) after burn injury is dependent on many variables, including type and location of burn injury, access to care, and pre-injury mental and physical health. Noting that prior studies were limited by small sample sizes, we aimed to use a large database to explore the associations between hand burn severity, functional hand outcomes, and RTW post-injury. Data from a multicenter longitudinal study were analyzed. Adults with burn injuries were classified into 6 groups ranking in severity of hand injury: (0) no hand burns, (1) single hand burn no grafting, (2) bilateral hand burn no grafting, (3) single hand burn requiring grafting, (4) bilateral hand burn requiring unilateral graft, (5) bilateral hand burn requiring bilateral grafts. Grafting was used as a proxy for burn severity. Self-reported employment status, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) scores and reported request for work accommodations were collected at discharge, 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-injury. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Tukey Test were completed to examine differences in outcomes by hand injury severity. A total of 4,621 participants met inclusion criteria. Group 5, those with most severe burns, had significantly longer RTW times than Groups 0-3 (p< 0.005). Group 5's (bilateral burn/unilateral graft) average RTW was greater, however not significantly, compared to group 4. At 6 months, the mean PROMIS UE scores for grafted groups (Group 3, 40.6; Group 5, 35.4) were significantly worse than non-grafted groups (Group 1, 46.8; Group 2, 45.0; (p< 0.0001). At 12 and 24 months, mean PROMIS UE scores were worse for grafted groups, though differences were no longer significant compared to non-grafted groups. At every time point, the majority of respondents did not request accommodations for their injuries from their employers, regardless of severity. Burn severity plays a significant role in both RTW and hand function for participants with hand burns. Additionally, the lack of correlation between burn severity and request for work accommodations hints at the baseline vulnerability of these populations. These findings suggest a need for systematic improvements in the way these patients are cared for and re-integrated into the workforce.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手部烧伤和职业损伤:烧伤模型系统研究项目中的烧伤对重返工作岗位结果的影响研究。
烧伤后重返工作岗位(RTW)取决于许多变量,包括烧伤类型和部位、获得护理的机会以及受伤前的身心健康状况。我们注意到之前的研究因样本量较小而受到限制,因此我们旨在利用一个大型数据库来探讨手部烧伤严重程度、手部功能结果和伤后恢复工作之间的关联。我们对一项多中心纵向研究的数据进行了分析。成人烧伤患者按手部损伤严重程度分为 6 组:(0)无手部烧伤;(1)单侧手部烧伤,无需植皮;(2)双侧手部烧伤,无需植皮;(3)单侧手部烧伤,需要植皮;(4)双侧手部烧伤,需要单侧植皮;(5)双侧手部烧伤,需要双侧植皮。移植被用作烧伤严重程度的替代指标。在出院、伤后 6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月时收集自我报告的就业状况、患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)上肢(UE)评分以及报告的工作便利要求。通过描述性统计和方差分析(ANOVA)以及事后Tukey检验来检验不同手部损伤严重程度的结果差异。共有 4621 名参与者符合纳入标准。烧伤最严重的第 5 组的复工时间明显长于第 0-3 组(P< 0.005)。6 个月时,移植组(第 3 组,40.6 分;第 5 组,35.4 分)的 PROMIS UE 平均得分明显低于非移植组(第 1 组,46.8 分;第 2 组,45.0 分;P< 0.0001)。在 12 个月和 24 个月时,移植组的 PROMIS UE 平均得分更差,但与未移植组相比,差异不再显著。在每个时间点,无论伤情严重程度如何,大多数受访者都没有要求雇主为其伤情提供方便。烧伤严重程度对手部烧伤参与者的复工和手部功能都有重要影响。此外,烧伤严重程度与申请工作便利之间缺乏相关性也暗示了这些人群的基本脆弱性。这些研究结果表明,有必要系统地改进这些患者的护理和重返劳动力市场的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Hand Burn Injuries and Occupational Impairment: A Study on the Impact of Burn Injuries on Return-to-Work Outcomes from the Burn Model System research program. Analysis of Burn Casualties in the Swords of Iron War. Evidence Supporting Conservative Scar Management Interventions Following Burn Injury: a review article. Needs assessment for a new military burn care educational curriculum focused on prolonged field care: The Burns for Providers Program (BP2). Letter to the Editor concerning Akhavan AA et al., Invasive non-Candida fungal infections in acute burns-a 13-year review of a single institution and review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1