Physician Documentation of Social Determinants of Health: Results from Two National Surveys.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09184-w
Bradley E Iott, Vaishali Patel, Chelsea Richwine
{"title":"Physician Documentation of Social Determinants of Health: Results from Two National Surveys.","authors":"Bradley E Iott, Vaishali Patel, Chelsea Richwine","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09184-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We measured physicians' (1) perceived importance of having access to social determinants of health (SDOH) data received from external providers in the electronic health record (EHR); (2) internal SDOH documentation practices in the EHR, including whether physicians document SDOH in a structured format that may facilitate use; and (3) use of EHR SDOH data to identify community resources and make referrals on behalf of patients.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of two national physician surveys.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Respondents from the American Board of Family Medicine Recertification Survey (ABFM, n = 4040), a survey of family physicians fielded 2021-2022, and the National Physician Health IT Survey (NPHIT, n = 3006), a survey of outpatient physicians across specialty areas fielded in 2022.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Under half of physicians felt that SDOH data were very important (ABFM: 44.8%, NPHIT: 30.8%). Although most physicians documented SDOH in the EHR (ABFM: 72%, NPHIT: 63.3%), fewer used structured documentation methods (ABFM: 56.3%, NPHIT: 33.2%). In both surveys, physicians who participated in value-based care initiatives, those for whom > 10% of their patient population was considered vulnerable, and those who felt that their clinic had the resources to address patients' social needs had higher likelihood of documenting SDOH. Sixty-two percent of family physicians reported using SDOH data for identifying resources and making referrals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2022, most physicians documented SDOH data in their EHR, yet fewer used structured methods, limiting data exchange opportunities to address patients' social needs. Under half of physicians considered access to external SDOH data to be \"very\" important, suggesting greater reliance on data collected internally and missed opportunities to identify patients who need support. Variation in perceived importance of SDOH data access and SDOH documentation by physician characteristics indicate opportunities to support adoption of structured documentation tools facilitating SDOH data capture and exchange to improve patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09184-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We measured physicians' (1) perceived importance of having access to social determinants of health (SDOH) data received from external providers in the electronic health record (EHR); (2) internal SDOH documentation practices in the EHR, including whether physicians document SDOH in a structured format that may facilitate use; and (3) use of EHR SDOH data to identify community resources and make referrals on behalf of patients.

Approach: We conducted a secondary analysis of two national physician surveys.

Participants: Respondents from the American Board of Family Medicine Recertification Survey (ABFM, n = 4040), a survey of family physicians fielded 2021-2022, and the National Physician Health IT Survey (NPHIT, n = 3006), a survey of outpatient physicians across specialty areas fielded in 2022.

Key results: Under half of physicians felt that SDOH data were very important (ABFM: 44.8%, NPHIT: 30.8%). Although most physicians documented SDOH in the EHR (ABFM: 72%, NPHIT: 63.3%), fewer used structured documentation methods (ABFM: 56.3%, NPHIT: 33.2%). In both surveys, physicians who participated in value-based care initiatives, those for whom > 10% of their patient population was considered vulnerable, and those who felt that their clinic had the resources to address patients' social needs had higher likelihood of documenting SDOH. Sixty-two percent of family physicians reported using SDOH data for identifying resources and making referrals.

Conclusions: In 2022, most physicians documented SDOH data in their EHR, yet fewer used structured methods, limiting data exchange opportunities to address patients' social needs. Under half of physicians considered access to external SDOH data to be "very" important, suggesting greater reliance on data collected internally and missed opportunities to identify patients who need support. Variation in perceived importance of SDOH data access and SDOH documentation by physician characteristics indicate opportunities to support adoption of structured documentation tools facilitating SDOH data capture and exchange to improve patient-centered care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生记录健康的社会决定因素:两项全国性调查的结果。
目标:我们测量了医生(1)对在电子健康记录(EHR)中获取外部医疗服务提供者提供的健康社会决定因素(SDOH)数据重要性的认知;(2)在电子健康记录中记录健康社会决定因素(SDOH)的内部做法,包括医生是否以结构化格式记录健康社会决定因素(SDOH)以方便使用;以及(3)使用电子健康记录中的健康社会决定因素(SDOH)数据来识别社区资源并代表患者进行转诊:我们对两项全国性医生调查进行了二次分析:受访者来自美国全科医学委员会再认证调查(ABFM,n = 4040)和全国医师健康 IT 调查(NPHIT,n = 3006),前者是 2021-2022 年对全科医师进行的调查,后者是 2022 年对各专业领域门诊医师进行的调查:不到一半的医生认为 SDOH 数据非常重要(ABFM:44.8%,NPHIT:30.8%)。虽然大多数医生在电子病历中记录了 SDOH 数据(ABFM:72%,NPHIT:63.3%),但使用结构化记录方法的医生较少(ABFM:56.3%,NPHIT:33.2%)。在这两项调查中,参与价值医疗计划的医生、其病人群体中超过 10% 的人被认为是弱势群体的医生,以及认为其诊所有资源满足病人社会需求的医生,记录 SDOH 的可能性较高。62%的家庭医生报告说,他们使用SDOH数据来确定资源和进行转诊:2022年,大多数医生在电子病历中记录了SDOH数据,但使用结构化方法的医生较少,这限制了数据交换的机会,无法满足患者的社会需求。不到一半的医生认为获取外部 SDOH 数据 "非常 "重要,这表明他们更加依赖于内部收集的数据,错失了识别需要支持的患者的机会。医生对 SDOH 数据获取和 SDOH 文件记录重要性的不同认识表明,有机会支持采用结构化文件记录工具,促进 SDOH 数据的获取和交换,从而改善以患者为中心的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study. Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis. The Master Adaptive Clinician Educator: A Framework for Future Educational Leaders in Academic Medicine. Empagliflozin in Diuretic-Refractory Ascites (DRAin-Em): Results of a Single-Center Feasibility Study. Effectiveness of a Novel Global Telemedicine Curriculum for Medical Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1