Baozhu Xu, Wenhui Li, Zhuozhi You, Nan Yang, Lanxiang Lin, Yuefeng Li
{"title":"Risk factors for left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Baozhu Xu, Wenhui Li, Zhuozhi You, Nan Yang, Lanxiang Lin, Yuefeng Li","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess potential risk factors for left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after acute myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science databases CNKI Scholar, VIP, and WanFang databases for all relevant epidemiological studies published up to August 1, 2023. Fixed-effects model or random-effects model was employed to pool the study-specific effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies with a total of 3,093,792 participants were included according to inclusion criteria. Major modifiable risk factors associated with LVR after MI were diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 2.053, 95% CI: 1.504-2.803), MI site (OR = 2.423, 95% CI: 1.584-3.708), cystatin C (OR = 6.204, 95% CI: 1.830-21.036), B-type natriuretic peptide (OR = 2.280, 95% CI: 1.466-3.546), as well as creatine kinase-myocardial band (OR = 1.013, 95% CI: 0.985-1.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study provides evidence indicating that diabetes, the site of MI, cystatin C, B-type natriuretic peptide, and creatine kinase-myocardial band are the primary risk factors for LVR after MI. Recognizing and addressing these modifiable risk factors is crucial for the development of effective preventive and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess potential risk factors for left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after acute myocardial infarction (MI).
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science databases CNKI Scholar, VIP, and WanFang databases for all relevant epidemiological studies published up to August 1, 2023. Fixed-effects model or random-effects model was employed to pool the study-specific effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Fifteen studies with a total of 3,093,792 participants were included according to inclusion criteria. Major modifiable risk factors associated with LVR after MI were diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 2.053, 95% CI: 1.504-2.803), MI site (OR = 2.423, 95% CI: 1.584-3.708), cystatin C (OR = 6.204, 95% CI: 1.830-21.036), B-type natriuretic peptide (OR = 2.280, 95% CI: 1.466-3.546), as well as creatine kinase-myocardial band (OR = 1.013, 95% CI: 0.985-1.042).
Conclusion: The current study provides evidence indicating that diabetes, the site of MI, cystatin C, B-type natriuretic peptide, and creatine kinase-myocardial band are the primary risk factors for LVR after MI. Recognizing and addressing these modifiable risk factors is crucial for the development of effective preventive and treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties.
As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.