Diagnosis and prognosis of different methods of tongue base mucosectomy for occult head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000040250
Dengshun Wang, Teng Zou, Tong Gao, Yuan Yao, Changfu Liu, Yu'e Wang, Haibin Lu, Hongwei Yu, Qiuxu Wang, Jianmin Song
{"title":"Diagnosis and prognosis of different methods of tongue base mucosectomy for occult head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Dengshun Wang, Teng Zou, Tong Gao, Yuan Yao, Changfu Liu, Yu'e Wang, Haibin Lu, Hongwei Yu, Qiuxu Wang, Jianmin Song","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) and trans-oral laser microsurgery (TLM) have been increasingly employed for the diagnosis and identification of primary occult cancers in the head and neck region. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the application and effectiveness of tonsillectomy with TORS and TLM in detecting these cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies using TORS or TLM in identifying the unknown primary sites of occult head and neck cancer, published from inception to September 2023. Two investigators independently screened articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2282 articles identified, 20 individual studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. Primary tumors were identified by TORS/TLM in 65% (364/561) of patients. The initial identification rates of lingual tonsillectomy (n = 219) and palatine tonsillectomy (n = 83) were 39% and 15%, respectively. The identification rates of primary sites for trans-oral surgical techniques were 60.7% (95% CI, 49.4-72%) for TORS and 75.7% (95% CI, 60.7-90.7%) for TLM. Seventy-nine point six percent (467/587) of the tumors were associated with human papilloma virus (HPV). The detection rate of HPV+ tumors was 79% (173/220) and the detection rate of HPV- tumors was 10% (5/52). The most common complication was nasogastric/gastrostomy, accounting for 6% (29/481). The length of hospital stay reported varied from 1 to more than 7 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is a latest systematic review of the detection rates of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary sites by tongue base mucosectomy (TBM) via TORS and TBM via TLM. This study confirmed that TBM via TLM performed better than TBM-TORS in the detection rate of the primary. In particular, TBM via TLM showed significant advantages in detecting primary lesions in HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) and trans-oral laser microsurgery (TLM) have been increasingly employed for the diagnosis and identification of primary occult cancers in the head and neck region. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the application and effectiveness of tonsillectomy with TORS and TLM in detecting these cancers.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies using TORS or TLM in identifying the unknown primary sites of occult head and neck cancer, published from inception to September 2023. Two investigators independently screened articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: From 2282 articles identified, 20 individual studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. Primary tumors were identified by TORS/TLM in 65% (364/561) of patients. The initial identification rates of lingual tonsillectomy (n = 219) and palatine tonsillectomy (n = 83) were 39% and 15%, respectively. The identification rates of primary sites for trans-oral surgical techniques were 60.7% (95% CI, 49.4-72%) for TORS and 75.7% (95% CI, 60.7-90.7%) for TLM. Seventy-nine point six percent (467/587) of the tumors were associated with human papilloma virus (HPV). The detection rate of HPV+ tumors was 79% (173/220) and the detection rate of HPV- tumors was 10% (5/52). The most common complication was nasogastric/gastrostomy, accounting for 6% (29/481). The length of hospital stay reported varied from 1 to more than 7 days.

Conclusion: This is a latest systematic review of the detection rates of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary sites by tongue base mucosectomy (TBM) via TORS and TBM via TLM. This study confirmed that TBM via TLM performed better than TBM-TORS in the detection rate of the primary. In particular, TBM via TLM showed significant advantages in detecting primary lesions in HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对隐匿性头颈癌的不同舌根粘液切除术的诊断和预后:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:经口机器人手术(TORS)和经口激光显微手术(TLM)越来越多地被用于诊断和识别头颈部的原发性隐匿癌症。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估使用 TORS 和 TLM 进行扁桃体切除术在检测这些癌症方面的应用和效果:我们在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中检索了从开始到 2023 年 9 月发表的符合条件的研究,这些研究使用 TORS 或 TLM 识别隐匿性头颈部癌症的未知原发部位。两名研究人员根据纳入和排除标准对文章进行了独立筛选:从 2282 篇文章中,有 20 项符合纳入标准的研究被纳入本次荟萃分析。65%的患者(364/561)通过TORS/TLM确定了原发性肿瘤。舌扁桃体切除术(n = 219)和腭扁桃体切除术(n = 83)的初始识别率分别为 39% 和 15%。经口手术技术的主要部位识别率为:TORS 60.7%(95% CI,49.4-72%),TLM 75.7%(95% CI,60.7-90.7%)。79.6%(467/587)的肿瘤与人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)有关。HPV+肿瘤的检出率为79%(173/220),HPV-肿瘤的检出率为10%(5/52)。最常见的并发症是鼻胃造口术,占 6%(29/481)。报告的住院时间从1天到7天以上不等:这是一篇最新的系统性综述,研究了通过TORS进行舌根粘液切除术(TBM)和通过TLM进行舌根粘液切除术(TBM)对原发部位不明的头颈部鳞状细胞癌的检出率。这项研究证实,经 TLM 的 TBM 在原发灶检出率方面优于经 TBM-TORS 的 TBM。特别是在检测HPV阳性的不明原发部位头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的原发病灶方面,经TLM的TBM具有明显优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case report of rectal small-cell undifferentiated carcinoma achieved pathological complete response. Neutrophil phenotypes in prolonged labor: Implications for therapeutic strategies. Nonlinear association of alkaline phosphatase-to-albumin ratio with all-cause and cancer mortality: Evidence from NHANES 2005 to 2016. New ultrasound-guided L5 selective nerve root block puncture approach for the treatment of pain due to high-iliac-crest lumbar disc herniation: A case report. Observation on the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1