The effectiveness of vasodilators on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000039794
Ningxin Han, Hui Qi, Yujie Yin, Yi Liu, Peipei Jin, Yunlong Hou, Zhenhua Jia
{"title":"The effectiveness of vasodilators on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ningxin Han, Hui Qi, Yujie Yin, Yi Liu, Peipei Jin, Yunlong Hou, Zhenhua Jia","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000039794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex progressive disease. Some vasodilators have been reported with therapeutic potential to protect vascular function therefore may delay the progression of COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, OVID and Clinicaltrials.gov database for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before January 1, 2024. RCTs which treatment with vasodilators to COPD patients were included. Gas-blood exchange indicators were the primary outcomes, and ventilation function and quality of life indicators were the secondary outcomes. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were extracted. Subgroup analysis of vasodilator category and COPD complicated with or without pulmonary hypertension (PH) were performed. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the meta-analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies with a total sample size of 986 were included. The results showed that the 2 types of drugs in vasodilators included PDE-5 inhibitors could improve DLCO (MD = 6.56 [95% CI (1.74, 11.39)], P = .008) and iNO could reduce PaCO2 (MD = -0.10 [95% CI (-0.17, -0.03)], P = .006). Vasodilators could reduce PaCO2 in COPD complicated with PH (COPD-PH) (MD = -0.10 [95% CI (-0.17, -0.03)], P = .006). There were no statistically significant differences in FEV1 (MD = 0.02 [95% CI (-0.11, 0.16)], P = .74), FEV1% predicted (MD = 0.07 [95% CI (-1.90, 2.05)], P = .94), FEV1/FVC (MD = 0.70 [95% CI (-4.02, 5.42)], P = .77) and VE/VCO2 (MD = -0.17 [95% CI (-2.39, 2.05)], P = .88) levels. The total SGRQ score was significantly lower in vasodilator groups (MD = -5.53 [95% CI (-9.81, -1.24)], P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The therapeutic effects of vasodilators for COPD are controversial. In this meta-analysis, vasodilators have benefits in improving gas-blood exchange function and quality of life in COPD patients. However, vasodilators may have a limited capacity to improve pulmonary function.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e39794"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex progressive disease. Some vasodilators have been reported with therapeutic potential to protect vascular function therefore may delay the progression of COPD.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, OVID and Clinicaltrials.gov database for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before January 1, 2024. RCTs which treatment with vasodilators to COPD patients were included. Gas-blood exchange indicators were the primary outcomes, and ventilation function and quality of life indicators were the secondary outcomes. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were extracted. Subgroup analysis of vasodilator category and COPD complicated with or without pulmonary hypertension (PH) were performed. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the meta-analysis was conducted.

Results: Twenty studies with a total sample size of 986 were included. The results showed that the 2 types of drugs in vasodilators included PDE-5 inhibitors could improve DLCO (MD = 6.56 [95% CI (1.74, 11.39)], P = .008) and iNO could reduce PaCO2 (MD = -0.10 [95% CI (-0.17, -0.03)], P = .006). Vasodilators could reduce PaCO2 in COPD complicated with PH (COPD-PH) (MD = -0.10 [95% CI (-0.17, -0.03)], P = .006). There were no statistically significant differences in FEV1 (MD = 0.02 [95% CI (-0.11, 0.16)], P = .74), FEV1% predicted (MD = 0.07 [95% CI (-1.90, 2.05)], P = .94), FEV1/FVC (MD = 0.70 [95% CI (-4.02, 5.42)], P = .77) and VE/VCO2 (MD = -0.17 [95% CI (-2.39, 2.05)], P = .88) levels. The total SGRQ score was significantly lower in vasodilator groups (MD = -5.53 [95% CI (-9.81, -1.24)], P = .01).

Conclusions: The therapeutic effects of vasodilators for COPD are controversial. In this meta-analysis, vasodilators have benefits in improving gas-blood exchange function and quality of life in COPD patients. However, vasodilators may have a limited capacity to improve pulmonary function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管扩张剂对慢性阻塞性肺病的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种复杂的进行性疾病。据报道,一些血管扩张剂具有保护血管功能的治疗潜力,因此可延缓慢性阻塞性肺病的进展:我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、OVID 和 Clinicaltrials.gov 数据库中检索了 2024 年 1 月 1 日之前发表的符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。其中包括对慢性阻塞性肺病患者使用血管扩张剂治疗的 RCT。气血交换指标为主要结果,通气功能和生活质量指标为次要结果。研究提取了平均差异和 95% 的置信区间。对血管扩张剂类别和合并或不合并肺动脉高压(PH)的慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行了分组分析。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,并进行荟萃分析:结果:共纳入 20 项研究,样本量共计 986 个。结果显示,血管扩张剂中的 2 种药物(包括 PDE-5 抑制剂)可改善 DLCO(MD = 6.56 [95% CI (1.74, 11.39)],P = .008),iNO 可降低 PaCO2(MD = -0.10 [95% CI (-0.17, -0.03)],P = .006)。血管扩张剂可降低 COPD 合并 PH(COPD-PH)患者的 PaCO2(MD = -0.10 [95% CI (-0.17, -0.03)],P = .006)。在 FEV1(MD = 0.02 [95% CI (-0.11, 0.16)],P = .74)、FEV1% 预测值(MD = 0.07 [95% CI (-1. 90, 2.05)],P = .74)方面,差异无统计学意义。90, 2.05)], P = .94), FEV1/FVC (MD = 0.70 [95% CI (-4.02, 5.42)], P = .77) 和 VE/VCO2 (MD = -0.17 [95% CI (-2.39, 2.05)], P = .88) 水平。血管扩张剂组的 SGRQ 总分明显降低(MD = -5.53 [95% CI (-9.81, -1.24)], P = .01):结论:血管扩张剂对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗效果尚存争议。在这项荟萃分析中,血管扩张剂对改善 COPD 患者的气血交换功能和生活质量有好处。不过,血管扩张剂改善肺功能的能力可能有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case report of rectal small-cell undifferentiated carcinoma achieved pathological complete response. Neutrophil phenotypes in prolonged labor: Implications for therapeutic strategies. Nonlinear association of alkaline phosphatase-to-albumin ratio with all-cause and cancer mortality: Evidence from NHANES 2005 to 2016. New ultrasound-guided L5 selective nerve root block puncture approach for the treatment of pain due to high-iliac-crest lumbar disc herniation: A case report. Observation on the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1