Frailty as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03537-z
Mojtaba Niknami, Hamed Tahmasbi, Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Ida Mohammadi, Seyed Ali Mofidi, Mohammadreza Alinejadfard, Aryan Aarabi, Samin Sadraei
{"title":"Frailty as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.","authors":"Mojtaba Niknami, Hamed Tahmasbi, Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi, Ida Mohammadi, Seyed Ali Mofidi, Mohammadreza Alinejadfard, Aryan Aarabi, Samin Sadraei","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03537-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cholecystectomy is a common surgery, it carries higher risks of postoperative complications and mortality for older adults. Age alone is not a reliable predictor of postoperative outcomes, whereas frailty may provide a more accurate assessment of a patient's health and functional status. Frailty, characterized by physical deterioration and reduced resilience, has been shown to predict mortality, prolonged recovery, and morbidity after various surgeries, including cholecystectomy. Thus, incorporating frailty evaluations into preoperative assessments can improve patient outcomes by individualizing treatment strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate how well frailty predicts postoperative outcomes following cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on August 14th, 2024, without restrictions on publication year or language. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and meta-analysis was conducted using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals as the effect size, employing a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine cohort studies comprising a total of 128,421 participants were included. The pooled results showed significantly higher odds of short-term mortality (OR: 5.54, 95% CI: 1.65-18.60, p = 0.006), postoperative morbidity (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.51-4.64, p = 0.001), major morbidity (OR: 3.61, 95% CI: 1.52-8.59), and respiratory failure (OR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.08-13.79) among frail patients. Additionally, frail patients had longer hospital stays (mean difference: 2.98 days, 95% CI: 1.91-4.04) and significantly higher odds of postoperative infection and sepsis. However, no association was evident with reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the value of utilizing frailty assessment tools in preoperative settings for predicting outcomes after cholecystectomy. These tools could improve decision-making in both emergency and elective situations, aiding in the choice between surgical and medical management, as well as between open and laparoscopic procedures tailored to each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03537-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although cholecystectomy is a common surgery, it carries higher risks of postoperative complications and mortality for older adults. Age alone is not a reliable predictor of postoperative outcomes, whereas frailty may provide a more accurate assessment of a patient's health and functional status. Frailty, characterized by physical deterioration and reduced resilience, has been shown to predict mortality, prolonged recovery, and morbidity after various surgeries, including cholecystectomy. Thus, incorporating frailty evaluations into preoperative assessments can improve patient outcomes by individualizing treatment strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate how well frailty predicts postoperative outcomes following cholecystectomy.

Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on August 14th, 2024, without restrictions on publication year or language. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and meta-analysis was conducted using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals as the effect size, employing a random-effects model.

Results: Nine cohort studies comprising a total of 128,421 participants were included. The pooled results showed significantly higher odds of short-term mortality (OR: 5.54, 95% CI: 1.65-18.60, p = 0.006), postoperative morbidity (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.51-4.64, p = 0.001), major morbidity (OR: 3.61, 95% CI: 1.52-8.59), and respiratory failure (OR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.08-13.79) among frail patients. Additionally, frail patients had longer hospital stays (mean difference: 2.98 days, 95% CI: 1.91-4.04) and significantly higher odds of postoperative infection and sepsis. However, no association was evident with reoperation rates.

Conclusion: This study highlights the value of utilizing frailty assessment tools in preoperative settings for predicting outcomes after cholecystectomy. These tools could improve decision-making in both emergency and elective situations, aiding in the choice between surgical and medical management, as well as between open and laparoscopic procedures tailored to each patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱是胆囊切除术后死亡率和发病率的预测因素:队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:虽然胆囊切除术是一种常见的手术,但老年人术后并发症和死亡率的风险较高。年龄本身并不能可靠地预测术后结果,而虚弱则能更准确地评估患者的健康和功能状况。体弱的特点是身体机能退化和恢复能力下降,已被证明可以预测包括胆囊切除术在内的各种手术后的死亡率、恢复期延长和发病率。因此,将虚弱评估纳入术前评估可通过个体化治疗策略改善患者的预后。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估虚弱程度对胆囊切除术后预后的预测效果:根据 PRISMA 指南,我们在 2024 年 8 月 14 日对 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了检索,对发表年份和语言没有限制。研究质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估,荟萃分析采用随机效应模型,以几率和 95% 置信区间作为效应大小:共纳入了 9 项队列研究,共有 128 421 人参与。汇总结果显示,体弱患者的短期死亡率(OR:5.54,95% CI:1.65-18.60,p = 0.006)、术后发病率(OR:2.65,95% CI:1.51-4.64,p = 0.001)、主要发病率(OR:3.61,95% CI:1.52-8.59)和呼吸衰竭(OR:3.85,95% CI:1.08-13.79)的几率明显更高。此外,体弱患者的住院时间更长(平均差异:2.98 天,95% CI:1.91-4.04),术后感染和败血症的几率也明显更高。结论:这项研究强调了利用老年患者的价值:本研究强调了术前使用虚弱评估工具预测胆囊切除术后结果的价值。这些工具可以改善急诊和择期手术的决策,帮助在手术和药物治疗之间做出选择,并根据每位患者的具体情况在开腹手术和腹腔镜手术之间做出选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative factors predicting outcomes in patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma referred for curative resection- a single-center 10-year experience. Low vs. conventional intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study. Comparative effectiveness totally endoscopic thyroidectomy via completely submental tri-hole approach and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy without insufflation. Curative treatment for oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer- results of a prospective multicenter study. New purse-string suture clamp and multi-functional seal cap: a simple intracorporeal circular-stapled oesophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1