A pilot study of novel ultrahigh-frequency dorsal root ganglia stimulation for chronic lower limb pain: Focusing on safety and feasibility.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1111/papr.13436
Shang-Yi Lee, Nai-Huan Hsiung, Kenneth B Chapman, Yu-Kai Cheng, Chieh-Liang Huang, Kuen-Bao Chen, Chi-Heng Chang, Yeong-Ray Wen
{"title":"A pilot study of novel ultrahigh-frequency dorsal root ganglia stimulation for chronic lower limb pain: Focusing on safety and feasibility.","authors":"Shang-Yi Lee, Nai-Huan Hsiung, Kenneth B Chapman, Yu-Kai Cheng, Chieh-Liang Huang, Kuen-Bao Chen, Chi-Heng Chang, Yeong-Ray Wen","doi":"10.1111/papr.13436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This single-arm, open-label, single-center observational pilot study assessed the safety and efficacy of ultrahigh-frequency dorsal root ganglia (UHF-DRG) stimulation in patients with chronic leg pain with or without low back pain. Such high-frequency electrostimulation had not been conducted in the human central nervous system previously.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of UHF-DRG stimulation (2 Hz pulses with 50 msec pulse-width and 500 kHz intrapulse sine waves, 5-min duration per stimulation) by identifying incident adverse events (AE) and severe adverse events (SAE) during the trial. The secondary objectives included assessment of pain reduction using a numerical rating score (NRS), presence of paraesthesia, and changes in four pain medications (weak opioids, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and non-steroid-anti-inflammatory drugs). One DRG lead was implanted for one day then removed, and the patients received maximal three times of UHF stimulation in total.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study focused on ten cases. Two of them did not complete the study due to difficulty of lead implantation. There was no SAE in this trial. Among the ten cases, AEs occurred in eight, three experienced injection-related local pain and one of them had a post-dural-puncture headache, others had symptoms un-related to implantation procedure or UHF stimulation. The average NRS was reduced from 6.4 ± 1.1 at baseline to 2.9 ± 1.1 on the second-day post-implantation, and it was striking that the NRS was maintained at 3.6 ± 2.8 until 2 days after lead removal. The results showed a trend of lower frequency in medication use for all types of analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this first-in-human pilot study, we discovered that intermittent pulsed UHF-DRG stimulations ameliorated chronic lower limb pain for an extended period in humans. Our finding opens up a new neuromodulatory concept and may initiate a novel paradigm for treating intractable pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This single-arm, open-label, single-center observational pilot study assessed the safety and efficacy of ultrahigh-frequency dorsal root ganglia (UHF-DRG) stimulation in patients with chronic leg pain with or without low back pain. Such high-frequency electrostimulation had not been conducted in the human central nervous system previously.

Materials and methods: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of UHF-DRG stimulation (2 Hz pulses with 50 msec pulse-width and 500 kHz intrapulse sine waves, 5-min duration per stimulation) by identifying incident adverse events (AE) and severe adverse events (SAE) during the trial. The secondary objectives included assessment of pain reduction using a numerical rating score (NRS), presence of paraesthesia, and changes in four pain medications (weak opioids, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and non-steroid-anti-inflammatory drugs). One DRG lead was implanted for one day then removed, and the patients received maximal three times of UHF stimulation in total.

Results: The study focused on ten cases. Two of them did not complete the study due to difficulty of lead implantation. There was no SAE in this trial. Among the ten cases, AEs occurred in eight, three experienced injection-related local pain and one of them had a post-dural-puncture headache, others had symptoms un-related to implantation procedure or UHF stimulation. The average NRS was reduced from 6.4 ± 1.1 at baseline to 2.9 ± 1.1 on the second-day post-implantation, and it was striking that the NRS was maintained at 3.6 ± 2.8 until 2 days after lead removal. The results showed a trend of lower frequency in medication use for all types of analgesics.

Conclusions: In this first-in-human pilot study, we discovered that intermittent pulsed UHF-DRG stimulations ameliorated chronic lower limb pain for an extended period in humans. Our finding opens up a new neuromodulatory concept and may initiate a novel paradigm for treating intractable pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型超高频背根神经节刺激治疗慢性下肢疼痛的试点研究:关注安全性和可行性。
研究目的这项单臂、开放标签、单中心观察性试验研究评估了超高频背根神经节(UHF-DRG)刺激对伴有或不伴有腰痛的慢性腿痛患者的安全性和有效性。这种高频电刺激以前从未在人类中枢神经系统中进行过:主要目的是通过确定试验期间发生的不良事件(AE)和严重不良事件(SAE),评估超高频-DRG 刺激(2 赫兹脉冲,脉宽 50 毫秒,脉冲内正弦波频率 500 千赫,每次刺激持续 5 分钟)的安全性。次要目标包括使用数字评分(NRS)评估疼痛减轻情况、是否存在麻痹以及四种止痛药物(弱阿片类药物、抗惊厥药、抗抑郁药和非类固醇抗炎药)的变化情况。植入一个 DRG 导联一天后取出,患者总共最多接受三次超高频刺激:研究主要针对 10 个病例。结果:该研究主要针对 10 例患者,其中 2 例患者因导联植入困难而未完成研究。本次试验未发生 SAE。在 10 例患者中,8 例出现了不良反应,其中 3 例出现了注射相关的局部疼痛,1 例出现了硬膜穿刺后头痛,其他患者的症状与植入过程或超高频刺激无关。平均 NRS 从基线时的 6.4 ± 1.1 降至植入后第二天的 2.9 ± 1.1,令人惊讶的是,NRS 一直维持在 3.6 ± 2.8,直到拔除导联后两天。结果显示,所有类型镇痛药的使用频率都呈下降趋势:在这项首次进行的人体试验研究中,我们发现间歇性脉冲超高频-DRG刺激能长期缓解人体的慢性下肢疼痛。我们的发现开辟了一个新的神经调节概念,并可能为治疗顽固性疼痛开创一种新的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Occipital nerve stimulation: A detailed description of a surgical approach and a discussion on implantation techniques. Artificial intelligence and pain medicine education: Benefits and pitfalls for the medical trainee. Opioid deprescribing in chronic pain management: Insights from Taiwan on the French experience. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in treatment of phantom lower limb pain following spinal cord injury: A case report. A pilot study of novel ultrahigh-frequency dorsal root ganglia stimulation for chronic lower limb pain: Focusing on safety and feasibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1