Bridging theory and data: A computational workflow for cultural evolution.

IF 9.4 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Pub Date : 2024-11-26 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1073/pnas.2322887121
Dominik Deffner, Natalia Fedorova, Jeffrey Andrews, Richard McElreath
{"title":"Bridging theory and data: A computational workflow for cultural evolution.","authors":"Dominik Deffner, Natalia Fedorova, Jeffrey Andrews, Richard McElreath","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2322887121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cultural evolution applies evolutionary concepts and tools to explain the change of culture over time. Despite advances in both theoretical and empirical methods, the connections between cultural evolutionary theory and evidence are often vague, limiting progress. Theoretical models influence empirical research but rarely guide data collection and analysis in logical and transparent ways. Theoretical models themselves are often too abstract to apply to specific empirical contexts and guide statistical inference. To help bridge this gap, we outline a quality-assurance computational workflow that starts from generative models of empirical phenomena and logically connects statistical estimates to both theory and real-world explanatory goals. We emphasize and demonstrate validation of the workflow using synthetic data. Using the interplay between conformity, migration, and cultural diversity as a case study, we present coded and repeatable examples of directed acyclic graphs, tailored agent-based simulations, a probabilistic transmission model for longitudinal data, and an approximate Bayesian computation model for cross-sectional data. We discuss the assumptions, opportunities, and pitfalls of different approaches to generative modeling and show how each can be used to improve data analysis depending on the structure of available data and the depth of theoretical understanding. Throughout, we highlight the significance of ethnography and of collecting basic cultural and demographic information about study populations and call for more emphasis on logical and theory-driven workflows as part of science reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"121 48","pages":"e2322887121"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322887121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural evolution applies evolutionary concepts and tools to explain the change of culture over time. Despite advances in both theoretical and empirical methods, the connections between cultural evolutionary theory and evidence are often vague, limiting progress. Theoretical models influence empirical research but rarely guide data collection and analysis in logical and transparent ways. Theoretical models themselves are often too abstract to apply to specific empirical contexts and guide statistical inference. To help bridge this gap, we outline a quality-assurance computational workflow that starts from generative models of empirical phenomena and logically connects statistical estimates to both theory and real-world explanatory goals. We emphasize and demonstrate validation of the workflow using synthetic data. Using the interplay between conformity, migration, and cultural diversity as a case study, we present coded and repeatable examples of directed acyclic graphs, tailored agent-based simulations, a probabilistic transmission model for longitudinal data, and an approximate Bayesian computation model for cross-sectional data. We discuss the assumptions, opportunities, and pitfalls of different approaches to generative modeling and show how each can be used to improve data analysis depending on the structure of available data and the depth of theoretical understanding. Throughout, we highlight the significance of ethnography and of collecting basic cultural and demographic information about study populations and call for more emphasis on logical and theory-driven workflows as part of science reform.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连接理论与数据:文化进化的计算工作流程。
文化进化论运用进化论的概念和工具来解释文化随时间的变化。尽管理论和实证方法都取得了进步,但文化进化理论与证据之间的联系往往模糊不清,限制了研究的进展。理论模型影响着实证研究,但却很少以合乎逻辑和透明的方式指导数据收集和分析。理论模型本身往往过于抽象,无法应用于具体的实证环境并指导统计推论。为了弥补这一缺陷,我们概述了一种质量保证计算工作流程,该流程从经验现象的生成模型出发,将统计估计与理论和现实世界的解释目标逻辑地联系起来。我们强调并演示了使用合成数据验证工作流程的方法。我们以一致性、迁移和文化多样性之间的相互作用为案例,介绍了有向无环图的编码和可重复示例、基于代理的定制模拟、纵向数据的概率传播模型以及横截面数据的近似贝叶斯计算模型。我们讨论了不同生成模型方法的假设、机遇和陷阱,并展示了如何根据可用数据的结构和理论理解的深度,利用每种方法改进数据分析。在整个过程中,我们强调了人种学以及收集研究人群的基本文化和人口信息的重要性,并呼吁在科学改革中更加重视逻辑和理论驱动的工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Using computational modeling to validate the onset of productive determiner-noun combinations in English-learning children. Global trends in antibiotic consumption during 2016-2023 and future projections through 2030. Magnetic soft microrobots for erectile dysfunction therapy. North Atlantic and the Barents Sea variability contribute to the 2023 extreme fire season in Canada. Stabilizing selection in an identified multisensory neuron in blind cavefish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1