Mixed reality-assisted versus landmark-guided spinal puncture in elderly patients: protocol for a stratified randomized controlled trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08628-2
Lei Gao, Haichao Zhang, Yidi Xu, Yanjun Dong, Lu Sheng, Yongqian Fan, Chunhui Qin, Weidong Gu
{"title":"Mixed reality-assisted versus landmark-guided spinal puncture in elderly patients: protocol for a stratified randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lei Gao, Haichao Zhang, Yidi Xu, Yanjun Dong, Lu Sheng, Yongqian Fan, Chunhui Qin, Weidong Gu","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08628-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Performing spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with spine degeneration is challenging for novice practitioners. This stratified randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of mixed reality-assisted spinal puncture (MRasp) with that of landmark-guided spinal puncture (LGsp) performed by novice practitioners in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center, stratified, blocked, parallel randomized controlled trial will include 168 patients (aged ≥ 65 years) scheduled for elective surgery involving spinal anesthesia. All spinal punctures will be performed by anesthesiology interns and residents trained at Huadong Hospital. Patients will be randomly assigned to the MRasp group (n = 84) or the LGsp group (n = 84). Based on each intern/resident's experience in spinal puncture, participants will be stratified into three clusters: the primary group, intermediate group, and advanced group. The primary outcome will be the comparison of the rate of successful first-attempt needle insertion between the MRasp group and the LGsp group. Secondary outcomes will include the number of needle insertion attempts, the number of redirection attempts, the number of passes, the rate of successful first needle pass, the spinal puncture time, the total procedure time, and the incidence of perioperative complications. A stratified subgroup analysis will also be conducted for interns/residents at different experience levels.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings from this trial establish the effectiveness of MRasp by novice practitioners in elderly patients. This trial may provide experimental evidence for exploring an effective visualization technology to assist in spinal puncture.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2300075291. Registered on August 31, 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=189622 .</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"780"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08628-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Performing spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with spine degeneration is challenging for novice practitioners. This stratified randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of mixed reality-assisted spinal puncture (MRasp) with that of landmark-guided spinal puncture (LGsp) performed by novice practitioners in elderly patients.

Methods: This prospective, single-center, stratified, blocked, parallel randomized controlled trial will include 168 patients (aged ≥ 65 years) scheduled for elective surgery involving spinal anesthesia. All spinal punctures will be performed by anesthesiology interns and residents trained at Huadong Hospital. Patients will be randomly assigned to the MRasp group (n = 84) or the LGsp group (n = 84). Based on each intern/resident's experience in spinal puncture, participants will be stratified into three clusters: the primary group, intermediate group, and advanced group. The primary outcome will be the comparison of the rate of successful first-attempt needle insertion between the MRasp group and the LGsp group. Secondary outcomes will include the number of needle insertion attempts, the number of redirection attempts, the number of passes, the rate of successful first needle pass, the spinal puncture time, the total procedure time, and the incidence of perioperative complications. A stratified subgroup analysis will also be conducted for interns/residents at different experience levels.

Discussion: The findings from this trial establish the effectiveness of MRasp by novice practitioners in elderly patients. This trial may provide experimental evidence for exploring an effective visualization technology to assist in spinal puncture.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2300075291. Registered on August 31, 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=189622 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者的混合现实辅助与地标引导脊柱穿刺:分层随机对照试验方案。
背景:对脊柱退行性变的老年患者实施脊柱麻醉对新手医师来说是一项挑战。这项分层随机对照试验旨在比较混合现实辅助脊柱穿刺术(MRasp)与新手脊柱穿刺术(LGsp)在老年患者中的效果:这项前瞻性、单中心、分层、阻断、平行随机对照试验将包括 168 名计划接受脊髓麻醉择期手术的患者(年龄≥ 65 岁)。所有脊髓穿刺均由华东医院培训的麻醉科实习生和住院医师进行。患者将被随机分配到 MRasp 组(n = 84)或 LGsp 组(n = 84)。根据每位实习生/住院医师的脊柱穿刺经验,参与者将被分为三组:初级组、中级组和高级组。主要结果是比较 MRasp 组和 LGsp 组之间首次尝试插针的成功率。次要结果将包括针插入尝试次数、重新定向尝试次数、穿刺次数、首次穿刺成功率、脊柱穿刺时间、总手术时间和围手术期并发症的发生率。还将对不同经验水平的实习生/住院医师进行分层分组分析:讨论:本试验的结果证实了新手医师对老年患者实施 MRasp 的有效性。本试验可为探索有效的可视化技术辅助脊柱穿刺提供实验证据:中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR2300075291。注册日期:2023 年 8 月 31 日。https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=189622 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a patient health engagement (PHE) model on rehabilitation participation in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community via a pragmatic, two-arm, randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol for the Deliver-EE trial. Prochlorperazine maleate versus placebo for the prevention of acute mountain sickness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Interventions to modify the habituation of biological responses to repeated stress in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. Integrating habit science and learning theory to promote maintenance of behavior change: does adding text messages to a habit-based sleep health intervention (HABITs) improve outcomes for eveningness chronotype young adults? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1