{"title":"Research on the rock cutting performance and feasibility verification of small-scale rotary cutting test for disc cutter.","authors":"Zilong Yang, Yong Hu, Mingxu Xu, Hao Pang, Youpeng Gu, Baicheng Zheng","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-80059-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Small-scale rock cutting tests serve as a simple approach to evaluate the performance of tunnel boring machines (TBMs), but the feasibility of this method requires further investigation. Herein, a small-scale rotary cutting machine is developed to conduct rock cutting tests, and the cutting performance is investigated. The results indicate that similar cutting performance can be achieved through both small-scale and full-scale tests. The critical penetration depth for effective rock cutting by the cutter is 0.5 mm, below which the cutter grinds against the rock. The optimal ratio of cutting spacing to penetration depth obtained in small-scale tests is 4.47. A result within the empirical range can be achieved by multiplying the optimal small-scale cutting parameters with the scale coefficient, demonstrating the feasibility of using small-scale tests to guide the design of cutter heads. Based on the test result, the scale prediction model is constructed to predict the full-scale cutting force. The predictive capability of the proposed model and CSM model is validated using 72 sets of full-scale test data involving the same types of rock, and the predictions of the proposed model are closer to the test data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"28558"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80059-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Small-scale rock cutting tests serve as a simple approach to evaluate the performance of tunnel boring machines (TBMs), but the feasibility of this method requires further investigation. Herein, a small-scale rotary cutting machine is developed to conduct rock cutting tests, and the cutting performance is investigated. The results indicate that similar cutting performance can be achieved through both small-scale and full-scale tests. The critical penetration depth for effective rock cutting by the cutter is 0.5 mm, below which the cutter grinds against the rock. The optimal ratio of cutting spacing to penetration depth obtained in small-scale tests is 4.47. A result within the empirical range can be achieved by multiplying the optimal small-scale cutting parameters with the scale coefficient, demonstrating the feasibility of using small-scale tests to guide the design of cutter heads. Based on the test result, the scale prediction model is constructed to predict the full-scale cutting force. The predictive capability of the proposed model and CSM model is validated using 72 sets of full-scale test data involving the same types of rock, and the predictions of the proposed model are closer to the test data.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.