Standardization of radiation therapy quality control system through mutual quality control based on failure mode and effects analysis.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s12194-024-00857-z
Yuki Tanimoto, Masataka Oita, Kazunobu Koshi, Kiyoshi Ishiwaki, Futoshi Hiramatsu, Toshihisa Sasaki, Hiroki Ise, Takashi Miyagawa, Takeshi Maeda, Shinsuke Okahira, Takashi Hamaguchi, Tatsuya Kawaguchi, Norihiro Funada, Shuhei Yamamoto, Akira Hiroshige, Yuki Mukai, Shohei Yoshida, Yoshiki Fujita, Atsuki Nakahira, Hirofumi Honda
{"title":"Standardization of radiation therapy quality control system through mutual quality control based on failure mode and effects analysis.","authors":"Yuki Tanimoto, Masataka Oita, Kazunobu Koshi, Kiyoshi Ishiwaki, Futoshi Hiramatsu, Toshihisa Sasaki, Hiroki Ise, Takashi Miyagawa, Takeshi Maeda, Shinsuke Okahira, Takashi Hamaguchi, Tatsuya Kawaguchi, Norihiro Funada, Shuhei Yamamoto, Akira Hiroshige, Yuki Mukai, Shohei Yoshida, Yoshiki Fujita, Atsuki Nakahira, Hirofumi Honda","doi":"10.1007/s12194-024-00857-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advancement of irradiation technology has increased the demand for quality control of radiation therapy equipment. Consequently, the number of quality control items and required personnel have also increased. However, differences in the proportion of qualified personnel to irradiation techniques have caused bias in quality control systems among institutions. To standardize the quality across institutions, researchers should conduct mutual quality control by analyzing the quality control data of one institution at another institution and comparing the results with those of their own institutions. This study uses failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to identify potential risks in 12 radiation therapy institutions, compares the results before and after implementation of mutual quality control, and examines the utility of mutual quality control in risk reduction. Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness factor is introduced into FMEA to evaluate the utility of mutual quality control.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00857-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advancement of irradiation technology has increased the demand for quality control of radiation therapy equipment. Consequently, the number of quality control items and required personnel have also increased. However, differences in the proportion of qualified personnel to irradiation techniques have caused bias in quality control systems among institutions. To standardize the quality across institutions, researchers should conduct mutual quality control by analyzing the quality control data of one institution at another institution and comparing the results with those of their own institutions. This study uses failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to identify potential risks in 12 radiation therapy institutions, compares the results before and after implementation of mutual quality control, and examines the utility of mutual quality control in risk reduction. Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness factor is introduced into FMEA to evaluate the utility of mutual quality control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基于失效模式和效应分析的相互质量控制,实现放射治疗质量控制系统的标准化。
辐照技术的发展增加了对放射治疗设备质量控制的需求。因此,质量控制项目和所需人员的数量也随之增加。然而,辐照技术人员比例的差异造成了各机构质量控制系统的偏差。为了使各机构的质量标准化,研究人员应通过分析一个机构在另一个机构的质量控制数据,并将结果与自己机构的数据进行比较,从而进行相互质量控制。本研究采用失效模式与效应分析法(FMEA)识别了 12 家放射治疗机构的潜在风险,比较了实施相互质量控制前后的结果,并研究了相互质量控制在降低风险方面的效用。此外,还在 FMEA 中引入了成本效益因素,以评估相互质量控制的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgment. Evaluation of calculation accuracy and computation time in a commercial treatment planning system for accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy. Development of deep learning-based novel auto-segmentation for the prostatic urethra on planning CT images for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Effect of deep learning reconstruction on the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions using computed tomography. Assessment of accuracy and repeatability of quantitative parameter mapping in MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1