Learning curve for the open Latarjet procedure: a single-surgeon study.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.5397/cise.2024.00199
Aidan G Papalia, Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Andrew Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Mandeep S Virk
{"title":"Learning curve for the open Latarjet procedure: a single-surgeon study.","authors":"Aidan G Papalia, Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Andrew Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Mandeep S Virk","doi":"10.5397/cise.2024.00199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The popularity of the Latarjet procedure (LP) for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability continues to rise. However, LP is technically demanding and associated with complications. This study aims to determine the learning curve for the open LP (oLP) and the threshold for proficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of all oLPs performed by a single surgeon in a single institution from 2016 to 2021. Operative time, defined as time from incision to closure, was the primary outcome of this study, and 1-year postoperative complications were the secondary outcome. After listing oLP cases in chronological order, they were classified into groups of 15, and the average operative time for each group was determined. Demographics, operative duration, and postoperative complications were compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five oLPs were included in this study, and operative times decreased after the first 15 procedures. While operative times continued to decrease with increasing case number, the learning curve began to plateau after 30 procedures. After 75 procedures, there was a total decrease in average operative time of 31.5 minutes relative to that of the first 15 cases. There were no differences in complication or revision rates among procedure groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing learning curves provides important insight into the complexity of surgical procedures. Our study demonstrates that the oLP has a steep learning curve with significant improvement in operative time after the first 15 cases. Operative time plateaus after 30 cases, indicating proficiency in this procedure. Level of evidence: IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.00199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The popularity of the Latarjet procedure (LP) for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability continues to rise. However, LP is technically demanding and associated with complications. This study aims to determine the learning curve for the open LP (oLP) and the threshold for proficiency.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of all oLPs performed by a single surgeon in a single institution from 2016 to 2021. Operative time, defined as time from incision to closure, was the primary outcome of this study, and 1-year postoperative complications were the secondary outcome. After listing oLP cases in chronological order, they were classified into groups of 15, and the average operative time for each group was determined. Demographics, operative duration, and postoperative complications were compared across groups.

Results: Seventy-five oLPs were included in this study, and operative times decreased after the first 15 procedures. While operative times continued to decrease with increasing case number, the learning curve began to plateau after 30 procedures. After 75 procedures, there was a total decrease in average operative time of 31.5 minutes relative to that of the first 15 cases. There were no differences in complication or revision rates among procedure groups.

Conclusions: Establishing learning curves provides important insight into the complexity of surgical procedures. Our study demonstrates that the oLP has a steep learning curve with significant improvement in operative time after the first 15 cases. Operative time plateaus after 30 cases, indicating proficiency in this procedure. Level of evidence: IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放式 Latarjet 手术的学习曲线:单个外科医生的研究。
背景:Latarjet手术(LP)在治疗肩关节前方不稳定方面的受欢迎程度持续上升。然而,LP对技术要求较高,且伴有并发症。本研究旨在确定开放式肩关节置换术(OLP)的学习曲线以及熟练程度的阈值:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为2016年至2021年期间在一家医疗机构由一名外科医生实施的所有开放式LP手术。手术时间(定义为从切口到闭合的时间)是本研究的主要结果,术后1年并发症是次要结果。按时间顺序排列OLP病例后,将其分为15组,并确定每组的平均手术时间。对各组的人口统计学、手术时间和术后并发症进行比较:本研究共纳入 75 例 OLP,前 15 例手术后手术时间缩短。随着病例数的增加,手术时间继续缩短,但学习曲线在 30 例手术后开始趋于平稳。75 例手术后,平均手术时间比前 15 例减少了 31.5 分钟。各手术组的并发症和翻修率没有差异:建立学习曲线对了解手术的复杂性非常重要。我们的研究表明,OLP 有一条陡峭的学习曲线,前 15 例手术后手术时间显著缩短。30例之后,手术时间趋于稳定,这表明该手术已经熟练掌握。证据等级:IV级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Descriptive analysis of total elbow arthroplasty for distal humerus fractures: 30-day complications. Learning curve for the open Latarjet procedure: a single-surgeon study. Outcomes of lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus latissimus dorsi transfer for external rotation deficit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reconsidering the clinical outcomes of the stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty design implant. The impact of supraspinatus tear on subscapularis muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1