NSAID Allergy Labels Associated With Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Stroke.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047921
Cheryl C W Tsui, Hugo W F Mak, William C Y Leung, Kay Cheong Teo, Yuen Kwun Wong, Valerie Chiang, Gary K K Lau, Philip H Li
{"title":"NSAID Allergy Labels Associated With Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Stroke.","authors":"Cheryl C W Tsui, Hugo W F Mak, William C Y Leung, Kay Cheong Teo, Yuen Kwun Wong, Valerie Chiang, Gary K K Lau, Philip H Li","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mislabeled drug allergy can restrict future prescriptions and medication use, but its prevalence and impact among patients with stroke remain unknown. This study investigated the prevalence of the most commonly labeled drug allergies, their accuracy, and their impact among patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this combined longitudinal and cross-sectional study, we compared the prevalence of allergy labels among the general population and patients with ischemic stroke between 2008 and 2014 from electronic health care records in Hong Kong. Outcomes between patients with stroke with or without the most prevalent labels (ie, NSAID) were compared. Rate of mislabeled NSAID allergy was confirmed by provocation testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the general population (n=702 966), patients with stroke had more labels (n=235) to cardiovascular and hematopoietic system (prevalence, 19.5% versus 9.2%; odds ratio [OR], 2.4 [95% CI, 1.74-3.32]; <i>P</i><0.001) and radiographic and diagnostic agents (prevalence, 4.2% versus 0.9%; OR, 4.82 [95% CI, 2.56-9.08]; <i>P</i><0.001). The most common labels were to NSAID (prevalence, 1.8%). Patients with NSAID allergy labels were significantly less likely to be prescribed aspirin after acute stroke (OR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.09-0.60]; <i>P</i>=0.003) and on follow-up (OR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.08-0.56]; <i>P</i>=0.002). The median duration of follow-up was 6.7 years (6499±2.49 patient-years). Patients with stroke with NSAID allergy labels also experienced significantly higher mortality (OR, 7.44 [95% CI, 2.44-23.18]; <i>P</i><0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 9.35 [95% CI, 1.95-44.86]; <i>P</i>=0.005), and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 6.09 [95% CI, 2.00-18.58]; <i>P</i>=0.001) in the poststroke period. Patients with NSAID allergy labels (who remained alive and could consent) were referred for allergist assessment and offered drug provocation testing. The majority (80%; 4/5) had negative provocation tests and were delabeled.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NSAID allergy labels were significantly more prevalent among patients with stroke, associated with excessive mortality, peripheral vascular disease, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Given the high rate of mislabeled allergies, multidisciplinary neuro-allergy interventions could have the potential to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047921","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mislabeled drug allergy can restrict future prescriptions and medication use, but its prevalence and impact among patients with stroke remain unknown. This study investigated the prevalence of the most commonly labeled drug allergies, their accuracy, and their impact among patients with stroke.

Methods: In this combined longitudinal and cross-sectional study, we compared the prevalence of allergy labels among the general population and patients with ischemic stroke between 2008 and 2014 from electronic health care records in Hong Kong. Outcomes between patients with stroke with or without the most prevalent labels (ie, NSAID) were compared. Rate of mislabeled NSAID allergy was confirmed by provocation testing.

Results: Compared with the general population (n=702 966), patients with stroke had more labels (n=235) to cardiovascular and hematopoietic system (prevalence, 19.5% versus 9.2%; odds ratio [OR], 2.4 [95% CI, 1.74-3.32]; P<0.001) and radiographic and diagnostic agents (prevalence, 4.2% versus 0.9%; OR, 4.82 [95% CI, 2.56-9.08]; P<0.001). The most common labels were to NSAID (prevalence, 1.8%). Patients with NSAID allergy labels were significantly less likely to be prescribed aspirin after acute stroke (OR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.09-0.60]; P=0.003) and on follow-up (OR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.08-0.56]; P=0.002). The median duration of follow-up was 6.7 years (6499±2.49 patient-years). Patients with stroke with NSAID allergy labels also experienced significantly higher mortality (OR, 7.44 [95% CI, 2.44-23.18]; P<0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 9.35 [95% CI, 1.95-44.86]; P=0.005), and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 6.09 [95% CI, 2.00-18.58]; P=0.001) in the poststroke period. Patients with NSAID allergy labels (who remained alive and could consent) were referred for allergist assessment and offered drug provocation testing. The majority (80%; 4/5) had negative provocation tests and were delabeled.

Conclusions: NSAID allergy labels were significantly more prevalent among patients with stroke, associated with excessive mortality, peripheral vascular disease, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Given the high rate of mislabeled allergies, multidisciplinary neuro-allergy interventions could have the potential to improve patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非甾体抗炎药过敏标签与中风患者的死亡率和心血管预后有关。
背景:错误标注药物过敏会限制今后的处方和用药,但其在中风患者中的流行率和影响仍不清楚。本研究调查了中风患者中最常标注的药物过敏的发生率、准确性及其影响:在这项纵向与横向相结合的研究中,我们比较了 2008 年至 2014 年间香港电子医疗记录中普通人群与缺血性中风患者的过敏标签流行率。我们还比较了贴有或未贴有最普遍标签(即非甾体抗炎药)的中风患者的治疗结果。通过激发试验确认非甾体抗炎药过敏的错误标签率:与普通人群(n=702 966)相比,中风患者在心血管和造血系统(发病率,19.5% 对 9.2%;几率比 [OR],2.4 [95% CI,1.74-3.32];PPP=0.003)和随访期间(OR,0.22 [95% CI,0.08-0.56];P=0.002)有更多标签(n=235)。中位随访时间为 6.7 年(6499±2.49 患者年)。贴有非甾体抗炎药过敏标签的卒中患者在卒中后的死亡率(OR,7.44 [95% CI,2.44-23.18];PP=0.005)和主要不良心血管事件(OR,6.09 [95% CI,2.00-18.58];P=0.001)也明显更高。有非甾体抗炎药过敏标签的患者(仍存活并同意接受治疗)被转诊至过敏专科医生进行评估,并接受药物激发试验。大多数患者(80%;4/5)的激发试验结果为阴性,因此被取消标签:结论:非甾体抗炎药过敏标签在中风患者中的发生率明显更高,与死亡率、外周血管疾病和主要不良心血管事件相关。鉴于过敏标签错误率较高,多学科神经过敏干预措施有可能改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
EXCELLENT Registry: A Prospective, Multicenter, Global Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatment With the EMBOTRAP Device. NSAID Allergy Labels Associated With Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Stroke. Cerebral Infarct Growth: Pathophysiology, Pragmatic Assessment, and Clinical Implications. WMH Contributions to Cognitive Impairment: Rationale and Design of the Diverse VCID Study. Diastolic Dysfunction and the Risk of Stroke and Major Bleeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1