Nursing Students' Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Simulation-Based Learning and Its Associations with Simulation Design Characteristics and Educational Practices.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S477309
Saoussen Bdiri Gabbouj, Chekib Zedini, Walid Naija
{"title":"Nursing Students' Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Simulation-Based Learning and Its Associations with Simulation Design Characteristics and Educational Practices.","authors":"Saoussen Bdiri Gabbouj, Chekib Zedini, Walid Naija","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S477309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Clinical simulation is a recent and now most used educational approach in health training programs. Its use for educational purposes in nursing education has gradually become widespread throughout the world. The aim of this study was to assess students' satisfaction and self-confidence with simulation-based learning and to identify the association of simulation design characteristics and educational practices with those outcomes.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This study utilized a correlational cross-sectional research design. Using a convenience sample, 110 nursing students were selected. Data were collected based on a questionnaire involving three instruments: the Simulation Design Scale, Educational Practices in Simulation Scale, and Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale. Data were analysed using SPSS software, version 26.0. Pearson's correlation coefficients was determined to describe and test the relationships between the different variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing students were mostly satisfied with their simulation-based learning activity and felt self-confident: M=21/25 and M=33.8/40, respectively. For simulation design characteristics, only \"Support\"was correlated with student satisfaction (<i>r</i> = 0.468, <i>p</i> = 0.000) and it was the factor most correlated with students' self-confidence levels (<i>r</i> = 0.477, <i>p</i> = 0.000). Furthermore, there were significant correlations between all educational practices and student satisfaction/self-confidence in learning, at a level of p < 0.01. \"Diverse ways of learning\" was the factor most correlated with student satisfaction (<i>r</i> = 0.858, <i>p</i> = 0.000) and student self-confidence levels (<i>r</i> = 0.738, <i>p</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study's findings show that consideration of simulation design elements and the features of all educational practices is necessary for the development of a successful simulation experience and the improvement of student satisfaction and self-confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"15 ","pages":"1093-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S477309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical simulation is a recent and now most used educational approach in health training programs. Its use for educational purposes in nursing education has gradually become widespread throughout the world. The aim of this study was to assess students' satisfaction and self-confidence with simulation-based learning and to identify the association of simulation design characteristics and educational practices with those outcomes.

Subjects and methods: This study utilized a correlational cross-sectional research design. Using a convenience sample, 110 nursing students were selected. Data were collected based on a questionnaire involving three instruments: the Simulation Design Scale, Educational Practices in Simulation Scale, and Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale. Data were analysed using SPSS software, version 26.0. Pearson's correlation coefficients was determined to describe and test the relationships between the different variables.

Results: Nursing students were mostly satisfied with their simulation-based learning activity and felt self-confident: M=21/25 and M=33.8/40, respectively. For simulation design characteristics, only "Support"was correlated with student satisfaction (r = 0.468, p = 0.000) and it was the factor most correlated with students' self-confidence levels (r = 0.477, p = 0.000). Furthermore, there were significant correlations between all educational practices and student satisfaction/self-confidence in learning, at a level of p < 0.01. "Diverse ways of learning" was the factor most correlated with student satisfaction (r = 0.858, p = 0.000) and student self-confidence levels (r = 0.738, p = 0.000).

Conclusion: The current study's findings show that consideration of simulation design elements and the features of all educational practices is necessary for the development of a successful simulation experience and the improvement of student satisfaction and self-confidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生对模拟学习的满意度和自信心及其与模拟设计特点和教育实践的关系。
目的:临床模拟是近年来卫生培训项目中最常用的一种教育方法。其在护理教育中的应用已逐渐在全世界普及。本研究旨在评估学生对模拟学习的满意度和自信心,并确定模拟设计特点和教育实践与这些结果的关联:本研究采用相关横断面研究设计。本研究采用了相关横断面研究设计,通过方便抽样的方式选取了 110 名护理专业学生。数据收集基于一份问卷,其中包括三个工具:模拟设计量表、模拟教育实践量表以及学生满意度和学习自信心量表。数据使用 26.0 版 SPSS 软件进行分析。采用皮尔逊相关系数来描述和检验不同变量之间的关系:结果:护理专业学生对模拟学习活动大多表示满意,并感到自信:M=21/25和M=33.8/40。就模拟设计特征而言,只有 "支持 "与学生满意度相关(r = 0.468,p = 0.000),并且是与学生自信心水平最相关的因素(r = 0.477,p = 0.000)。此外,所有教育实践与学生对学习的满意度/自信心之间都有明显的相关性,相关水平为 p < 0.01。"多元化学习方式 "是与学生满意度(r = 0.858,p = 0.000)和学生自信心水平(r = 0.738,p = 0.000)最相关的因素:目前的研究结果表明,要开发成功的模拟体验,提高学生的满意度和自信心,就必须考虑模拟设计要素和所有教育实践的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Multi-Institutional Study Regarding the Perceptions of Students and Faculty Members About Constructive Feedback for Medical Students in Medical Education. Patient Safety Attitudes Among Saudi Medical Students and Interns: Insights for Improving Medical Education. Comparisons of the Academic Performance of Medical and Health-Sciences Students Related to Three Learning Methods: A Cross-Sectional Study. Confidence in Prescribing Practices: Perspectives of Senior Medical Students and Recent Graduates at Qatar University. Evaluation of the Learning Curve of Endotracheal Intubation with Videolaryngoscopes: McGrathMAC, UESCOPE, and Airtraq by Young Anesthesiology Residents - Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Crossover Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1