Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Quick Primer on When to Use and When to Avoid.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis and haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2451-4014
Antoine Bejjani, Behnood Bikdeli
{"title":"Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Quick Primer on When to Use and When to Avoid.","authors":"Antoine Bejjani, Behnood Bikdeli","doi":"10.1055/a-2451-4014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed the landscape of antithrombotic therapy in the past two decades. However, there is uncertainty about when they should or should not be used for treatment or prevention of thromboembolic events. DOACs have largely replaced warfarin for many patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism who require anticoagulant therapy. In addition to noninferior efficacy, fewer drug-drug and food-drug interactions and improved convenience; DOACs have been shown to reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. They have also received new indications compared with warfarin, such as cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with stable atherosclerotic diseases. However, there are some scenarios in which DOACs are associated with inferior efficacy or worse safety compared with standard treatment, such as warfarin. These include patients with mechanical heart valves, thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, and others. Although DOACs offer a streamlined and convenient option for the management of many patients with or at risk of thromboembolic events, their use should be avoided in certain high-risk scenarios. This minireview summarizes such conditions and those in which there is uncertainty for use of DOACs for particular diseases or particular patient subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":23036,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2451-4014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed the landscape of antithrombotic therapy in the past two decades. However, there is uncertainty about when they should or should not be used for treatment or prevention of thromboembolic events. DOACs have largely replaced warfarin for many patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism who require anticoagulant therapy. In addition to noninferior efficacy, fewer drug-drug and food-drug interactions and improved convenience; DOACs have been shown to reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. They have also received new indications compared with warfarin, such as cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with stable atherosclerotic diseases. However, there are some scenarios in which DOACs are associated with inferior efficacy or worse safety compared with standard treatment, such as warfarin. These include patients with mechanical heart valves, thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, and others. Although DOACs offer a streamlined and convenient option for the management of many patients with or at risk of thromboembolic events, their use should be avoided in certain high-risk scenarios. This minireview summarizes such conditions and those in which there is uncertainty for use of DOACs for particular diseases or particular patient subgroups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接口服抗凝剂:直接口服抗凝药:何时使用何时避免的快速入门指南》。
直接口服抗凝药(DOACs)在过去二十年中改变了抗血栓治疗的格局。然而,对于何时应该或不应该使用 DOACs 治疗或预防血栓栓塞事件还存在不确定性。对于许多需要抗凝治疗的心房颤动或静脉血栓栓塞患者来说,DOAC 在很大程度上已经取代了华法林。DOACs 除了疗效非凡、减少药物和食物之间的相互作用以及更方便使用外,还能降低颅内出血的风险。与华法林相比,DOACs 还获得了新的适应症,如降低稳定性动脉粥样硬化疾病患者的心血管风险。然而,与华法林等标准治疗相比,在某些情况下 DOAC 的疗效较差或安全性较低。这些情况包括患有机械心脏瓣膜、血栓性抗磷脂综合征等疾病的患者。尽管 DOACs 为许多血栓栓塞事件患者或有血栓栓塞风险的患者的治疗提供了简化和方便的选择,但在某些高风险情况下应避免使用 DOACs。本小视图总结了这些情况以及在特定疾病或特定患者亚群中使用 DOACs 存在不确定性的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis and haemostasis
Thrombosis and haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thrombosis and Haemostasis publishes reports on basic, translational and clinical research dedicated to novel results and highest quality in any area of thrombosis and haemostasis, vascular biology and medicine, inflammation and infection, platelet and leukocyte biology, from genetic, molecular & cellular studies, diagnostic, therapeutic & preventative studies to high-level translational and clinical research. The journal provides position and guideline papers, state-of-the-art papers, expert analysis and commentaries, and dedicated theme issues covering recent developments and key topics in the field.
期刊最新文献
Handheld Point-of-Care Devices for Snakebite Coagulopathy: A Scoping Review. Ticagrelor Therapy Modifications after Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ever-Evolving Issue. Validity of Diagnosis of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Based on International Classification of Diseases Coding in a Claims Database. Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Quick Primer on When to Use and When to Avoid. Circulating levels of Low Density Granulocytes and cell-free DNA as predictors of cardiovascular disease and bone deterioration in SLE patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1