First-in-human trial using mixed-reality visualization for patient setup during breast or chest wall radiotherapy.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1186/s13014-024-02552-0
Perry B Johnson, Julie Bradley, Samsun Lampotang, Amanda Jackson, David Lizdas, William Johnson, Eric Brooks, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Nancy Mendenhall
{"title":"First-in-human trial using mixed-reality visualization for patient setup during breast or chest wall radiotherapy.","authors":"Perry B Johnson, Julie Bradley, Samsun Lampotang, Amanda Jackson, David Lizdas, William Johnson, Eric Brooks, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Nancy Mendenhall","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02552-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of mixed-reality (MixR) visualization for patient setup in breast and chest wall radiotherapy (RT) by performing a first-in-human clinical trial comparing MixR with a 3-point alignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IRB approval was granted for a study incorporating MixR during the setup process for patients undergoing proton (n = 10) or photon (n = 8) RT to the breast or chest wall. For each patient, MixR was utilized for five fractions and compared against another five fractions using 3-point alignment. During fractions with MixR, the patient was aligned by at least one therapist wearing a HoloLens 2 device who was able to guide the process by simultaneously and directly viewing the patient and a hologram of the patient's surface derived from their simulation CT scan. Alignment accuracy was quantified with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for photon treatments and CBCT plus kV/kV imaging for proton treatments. Registration time was tracked throughout the setup process as well as the amount of image guidance (IGRT) utilized for final alignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the proton cohort, the mean 3D shift was 0.96 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.18 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy between the two techniques was less than 0.5 cm. In the photon cohort, the mean 3D shift was 1.18 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.00 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy was less than 0.3 cm. Minor differences were seen in registration time and the amount of IGRT utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MixR for patient setup for breast cancer RT is possible at the level of accuracy and efficiency provided by a 3-point alignment. Further developments in marker tracking, feedback, and a better understanding of the perceptual challenges of MixR are needed to achieve a similar level of accuracy as provided by modern surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) systems.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, UFHPTI 2015-BR05: Improving Breast Radiotherapy Setup and Delivery Using Mixed-Reality Visualization, NCT05178927.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02552-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of mixed-reality (MixR) visualization for patient setup in breast and chest wall radiotherapy (RT) by performing a first-in-human clinical trial comparing MixR with a 3-point alignment.

Methods: IRB approval was granted for a study incorporating MixR during the setup process for patients undergoing proton (n = 10) or photon (n = 8) RT to the breast or chest wall. For each patient, MixR was utilized for five fractions and compared against another five fractions using 3-point alignment. During fractions with MixR, the patient was aligned by at least one therapist wearing a HoloLens 2 device who was able to guide the process by simultaneously and directly viewing the patient and a hologram of the patient's surface derived from their simulation CT scan. Alignment accuracy was quantified with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for photon treatments and CBCT plus kV/kV imaging for proton treatments. Registration time was tracked throughout the setup process as well as the amount of image guidance (IGRT) utilized for final alignment.

Results: In the proton cohort, the mean 3D shift was 0.96 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.18 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy between the two techniques was less than 0.5 cm. In the photon cohort, the mean 3D shift was 1.18 cm using 3-point alignment and 1.00 cm using MixR. An equivalence test indicated that the difference in registration accuracy was less than 0.3 cm. Minor differences were seen in registration time and the amount of IGRT utilization.

Conclusions: MixR for patient setup for breast cancer RT is possible at the level of accuracy and efficiency provided by a 3-point alignment. Further developments in marker tracking, feedback, and a better understanding of the perceptual challenges of MixR are needed to achieve a similar level of accuracy as provided by modern surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) systems.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, UFHPTI 2015-BR05: Improving Breast Radiotherapy Setup and Delivery Using Mixed-Reality Visualization, NCT05178927.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次在人体试验中使用混合现实可视化技术为乳腺或胸壁放疗期间的患者进行设置。
背景:本研究的目的是评估混合现实(MixR)可视化在乳腺和胸壁放疗(RT)患者设置过程中的可行性,方法是进行首次人体临床试验,比较混合现实与三点对准:乳腺或胸壁接受质子(10 人)或光子(8 人)RT 治疗的患者在设置过程中使用 MixR 的研究已获得 IRB 批准。对每名患者使用 MixR 进行五次分段,并与使用三点对齐的另外五次分段进行比较。在使用 MixR 进行治疗的过程中,患者至少由一名佩戴 HoloLens 2 设备的治疗师进行对准,治疗师可以同时直接查看患者和从模拟 CT 扫描中获得的患者表面全息图,从而指导治疗过程。光子治疗使用锥束 CT (CBCT),质子治疗使用 CBCT 加 kV/kV 成像来量化对准的准确性。对整个设置过程中的注册时间以及最终对准所使用的图像引导(IGRT)数量进行了跟踪:在质子队列中,使用三点对准的平均三维偏移为 0.96 厘米,而使用 MixR 的平均三维偏移为 1.18 厘米。等效测试表明,两种技术的配准精度差异小于 0.5 厘米。在光子队列中,使用三点对齐的平均 3D 移位为 1.18 厘米,使用 MixR 的平均 3D 移位为 1.00 厘米。等效测试表明,配准精度的差异小于 0.3 厘米。在配准时间和 IGRT 使用量方面存在微小差异:结论:MixR 用于乳腺癌 RT 的患者设置,可以达到三点对准的准确性和效率水平。要想达到与现代体表引导放射治疗(SGRT)系统类似的精确度水平,还需要在标记跟踪、反馈和更好地理解 MixR 的感知挑战方面取得进一步发展:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,UFHPTI 2015-BR05:使用混合现实可视化改进乳腺放射治疗的设置和实施,NCT05178927。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of radiation-related lymphocyte recovery on the prognosis of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective analysis. Correction: Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas. Deep learning-based synthetic CT for dosimetric monitoring of combined conventional radiotherapy and lattice boost in large lung tumors. Correction: The significance of risk stratification through nomogram-based assessment in determining postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients diagnosed with pT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer. Sequential or simultaneous-integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer patients: trade-offs between skin toxicity and risk of compromised coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1