The Effect of Medicaid Expansion on Access to Anti-incontinence Surgery.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001592
Brittany Roberts, Ashar Ata, Erin C Deverdis, Helena Randle, Katherine Husk, Bradley Jacobs, Gillian Wolff, Rebecca Rogers
{"title":"The Effect of Medicaid Expansion on Access to Anti-incontinence Surgery.","authors":"Brittany Roberts, Ashar Ata, Erin C Deverdis, Helena Randle, Katherine Husk, Bradley Jacobs, Gillian Wolff, Rebecca Rogers","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Medicaid expansion broadened access to care; however, limited data about the effect on access to anti-incontinence surgical procedures exist.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion in 2014, some regions have had more states adopt expansion (NE-Northeast, W-West) than other regions (S-South, MW-Midwest). We aimed to determine if the proportion of Medicaid funded anti-incontinence procedures increased after Medicaid expansion and whether increases were different by U.S. region.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2012-2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample was reviewed for anti-incontinence surgical procedures. Medicaid supported surgical procedures were compared by region and year, and among marginalized populations. During the study period 66,510 surgical procedures were performed. Medicaid as a primary payer for anti-incontinence procedures increased from 10% to 12% (P = <0.001) between 2012 and 2018. The percentage of Medicaid supported procedures performed in the NE (13%) and W (17%) were greater than MW (9%) and S (8%). Procedures among Black, Hispanic or lowest income quartile patients were lowest in the S and did not increase after expansion during the study period (2012 vs 2018, all P = NS). When controlling for confounders, the MW (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95% CI 0.46-0.74) and S (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.26-0.42) were less likely to have Medicaid covered surgical procedures compared to the NE and W (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.84-1.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nationally, the percentage of Medicaid-supported anti-incontinence procedures increased after expansion. Northeast and W access to procedures increased, and access by marginalized populations broadened, while the S and MW had the most limited proportion of anti-incontinence surgical procedures covered by Medicaid.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Medicaid expansion broadened access to care; however, limited data about the effect on access to anti-incontinence surgical procedures exist.

Objective: Since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion in 2014, some regions have had more states adopt expansion (NE-Northeast, W-West) than other regions (S-South, MW-Midwest). We aimed to determine if the proportion of Medicaid funded anti-incontinence procedures increased after Medicaid expansion and whether increases were different by U.S. region.

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study.

Results: The 2012-2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample was reviewed for anti-incontinence surgical procedures. Medicaid supported surgical procedures were compared by region and year, and among marginalized populations. During the study period 66,510 surgical procedures were performed. Medicaid as a primary payer for anti-incontinence procedures increased from 10% to 12% (P = <0.001) between 2012 and 2018. The percentage of Medicaid supported procedures performed in the NE (13%) and W (17%) were greater than MW (9%) and S (8%). Procedures among Black, Hispanic or lowest income quartile patients were lowest in the S and did not increase after expansion during the study period (2012 vs 2018, all P = NS). When controlling for confounders, the MW (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95% CI 0.46-0.74) and S (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.26-0.42) were less likely to have Medicaid covered surgical procedures compared to the NE and W (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.84-1.29).

Conclusions: Nationally, the percentage of Medicaid-supported anti-incontinence procedures increased after expansion. Northeast and W access to procedures increased, and access by marginalized populations broadened, while the S and MW had the most limited proportion of anti-incontinence surgical procedures covered by Medicaid.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗补助扩展对接受抗失禁手术的影响。
重要性:医疗补助计划的扩展扩大了医疗服务的可及性;然而,关于抗尿失禁外科手术的可及性的数据却很有限:自 2014 年《可负担医疗法案》(ACA)扩大医疗补助范围以来,一些地区(东北部、西部)采用扩大医疗补助范围的州多于其他地区(南部、中西部)。我们旨在确定医疗补助计划扩大后,医疗补助计划资助的抗尿失禁手术比例是否增加,以及美国各地区增加的比例是否不同:这是一项回顾性队列研究:对 2012-2018 年医疗成本与利用项目全国住院病人样本中的抗尿失禁手术程序进行了审查。按地区、年份和边缘人群对医疗补助支持的手术程序进行了比较。研究期间共进行了 66,510 例手术。医疗补助计划作为抗尿失禁手术的主要支付方从 10% 增加到 12%(P = 结论):在全国范围内,医疗补助计划支持的抗尿失禁手术的比例在扩展后有所增加。东北部和西部地区获得手术的机会增加,边缘化人群获得手术的机会扩大,而南部和西部地区获得医疗补助计划支持的抗尿失禁手术的比例最为有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barbed Suture Strength in Sacrocolpopexy: Does Pattern Matter? Adverse Events Associated With Female External Urinary Collection Devices. Tamsulosin to Prevent Urinary Retention After Vaginal Urogynecologic Surgery. The Effect of Concomitant Hysterectomy Route on Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes. Urogynecology Research Is Underrepresented in Top Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1