A Flexible Membrane May Improve Bone Regeneration by Increasing Hydrophilicity and Conformability in Lateral Bone Augmentation.

IF 8.1 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Biomaterials research Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34133/bmr.0113
Dongseob Lee, Young-Chang Ko, Ki-Tae Koo, Yang-Jo Seol, Yong-Moo Lee, Jungwon Lee
{"title":"A Flexible Membrane May Improve Bone Regeneration by Increasing Hydrophilicity and Conformability in Lateral Bone Augmentation.","authors":"Dongseob Lee, Young-Chang Ko, Ki-Tae Koo, Yang-Jo Seol, Yong-Moo Lee, Jungwon Lee","doi":"10.34133/bmr.0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collagen membranes play a crucial role in guided bone regeneration (GBR) by preventing soft tissue infiltration and maintaining space for bone formation. This study investigated the impact of collagen membrane flexibility on GBR outcomes through in vitro and in vivo analyses. Flexible (0.3 mm in width) and stiff (0.5 mm in width) porcine collagen membranes were compared. In vitro tests assessed hydrophilicity, enzymatic degradation, conformability, space maintenance, and tensile strength. An in vivo study using a canine model evaluated bone regeneration in standardized mandibular defects filled with deproteinized porcine bone mineral and covered with no membrane, flexible membrane, or stiff membrane. Micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analyses were performed at 8 and 16 weeks. The flexible membrane demonstrated superior hydrophilicity, faster enzymatic degradation, and greater conformability in vitro. In vivo, micro-computed tomography analysis revealed similar alveolar ridge widths across all groups. Histomorphometric analysis at 16 weeks showed significantly larger regenerated areas in the flexible membrane group compared to controls in coronal, middle, and apical regions. Both membrane groups exhibited higher regeneration ratios than controls, with significant differences in the coronal area. The flexible membrane group demonstrated significantly higher new bone formation in all regions compared to controls at 16 weeks. These findings suggest that flexible membrane substantially enhances GBR outcomes by increasing hydrophilicity and conformability. The study highlights the potential clinical benefits of incorporating flexible membranes in GBR procedures for improved bone regeneration outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93902,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials research","volume":"28 ","pages":"0113"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/bmr.0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collagen membranes play a crucial role in guided bone regeneration (GBR) by preventing soft tissue infiltration and maintaining space for bone formation. This study investigated the impact of collagen membrane flexibility on GBR outcomes through in vitro and in vivo analyses. Flexible (0.3 mm in width) and stiff (0.5 mm in width) porcine collagen membranes were compared. In vitro tests assessed hydrophilicity, enzymatic degradation, conformability, space maintenance, and tensile strength. An in vivo study using a canine model evaluated bone regeneration in standardized mandibular defects filled with deproteinized porcine bone mineral and covered with no membrane, flexible membrane, or stiff membrane. Micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analyses were performed at 8 and 16 weeks. The flexible membrane demonstrated superior hydrophilicity, faster enzymatic degradation, and greater conformability in vitro. In vivo, micro-computed tomography analysis revealed similar alveolar ridge widths across all groups. Histomorphometric analysis at 16 weeks showed significantly larger regenerated areas in the flexible membrane group compared to controls in coronal, middle, and apical regions. Both membrane groups exhibited higher regeneration ratios than controls, with significant differences in the coronal area. The flexible membrane group demonstrated significantly higher new bone formation in all regions compared to controls at 16 weeks. These findings suggest that flexible membrane substantially enhances GBR outcomes by increasing hydrophilicity and conformability. The study highlights the potential clinical benefits of incorporating flexible membranes in GBR procedures for improved bone regeneration outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柔性膜可通过增加亲水性和适形性改善外侧骨增量的骨再生效果
胶原蛋白膜在引导骨再生(GBR)中起着至关重要的作用,它能防止软组织浸润并保持骨形成的空间。本研究通过体外和体内分析,研究了胶原蛋白膜的柔韧性对 GBR 结果的影响。对柔性(宽度为 0.3 毫米)和刚性(宽度为 0.5 毫米)猪胶原蛋白膜进行了比较。体外测试评估了亲水性、酶降解、保形性、空间维持和拉伸强度。一项使用犬模型进行的体内研究评估了标准化下颌骨缺损中的骨再生情况,缺损中填充了去蛋白猪骨矿物质,并覆盖了无膜、柔性膜或硬膜。分别在 8 周和 16 周时进行了显微计算机断层扫描和组织形态分析。柔性膜在体外表现出更佳的亲水性、更快的酶降解速度和更高的保形性。在体内,显微计算机断层扫描分析表明所有组的牙槽嵴宽度相似。16 周的组织形态分析表明,与对照组相比,柔性膜组在冠状区、中间区和根尖区的再生面积明显更大。两组膜的再生率均高于对照组,冠状区差异显著。16 周时,柔性膜组在所有区域的新骨形成均明显高于对照组。这些研究结果表明,柔性膜通过增加亲水性和顺应性,大大提高了 GBR 的效果。该研究强调了在 GBR 程序中加入柔性膜以改善骨再生效果的潜在临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Water-Dispersible and Biocompatible Polymer-Based Organic Upconversion Nanoparticles for Transdermal Delivery. A Flexible Membrane May Improve Bone Regeneration by Increasing Hydrophilicity and Conformability in Lateral Bone Augmentation. Hollow Bismuth Nanoparticle-Loaded Gelatin Hydrogel Regulates M2 Polarization of Macrophages to Promote Infected Wound Healing. Pulmonary Delivery of Anti-microRNA Oligonucleotide and Glycyrrhizic Acid Using Ternary Peptide Micelles for the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury. Cell Membrane-Coated Nanotherapeutics for the Targeted Treatment of Acute and Chronic Colitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1