Physical Models for the Astrophysical Population of Black Holes: Application to the Bump in the Mass Distribution of Gravitational-wave Sources

Jacob Golomb, Maximiliano Isi and Will M. Farr
{"title":"Physical Models for the Astrophysical Population of Black Holes: Application to the Bump in the Mass Distribution of Gravitational-wave Sources","authors":"Jacob Golomb, Maximiliano Isi and Will M. Farr","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/ad8572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gravitational-wave observations of binary black holes have revealed unexpected structure in the black hole mass distribution. Previous studies employ physically motivated phenomenological models and infer the parameters that control the features of the mass distribution that are allowed in their model, associating the constraints on those parameters with their physical motivations a posteriori. In this work, we take an alternative approach in which we introduce a model parameterizing the underlying stellar and core-collapse physics and obtaining the remnant black hole distribution as a derived by-product. In doing so, we constrain the stellar physics necessary to explain the astrophysical distribution of black hole properties under a given model. We apply this to the mapping between initial mass and remnant black hole mass, accounting for mass-dependent mass loss using a simple parameterized description. Allowing the parameters of the initial mass–remnant mass relationship to evolve with redshift permits correlated and physically reasonable changes to features in the mass function. We find that the current data are consistent with no redshift evolution in the core–remnant mass relationship, but place only weak constraints on the change of these parameters. This procedure can be applied to modeling any physical process underlying the astrophysical distribution. We illustrate this by applying our model to the pulsational pair instability supernova (PPISN) process, previously proposed as an explanation for the observed excess of black holes at ∼35 M⊙. Placing constraints on the reaction rates necessary to explain the PPISN parameters, we concur with previous results in the literature that the peak observed at ∼35 M⊙ is unlikely to be a signature from the PPISN process as presently understood.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"172 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gravitational-wave observations of binary black holes have revealed unexpected structure in the black hole mass distribution. Previous studies employ physically motivated phenomenological models and infer the parameters that control the features of the mass distribution that are allowed in their model, associating the constraints on those parameters with their physical motivations a posteriori. In this work, we take an alternative approach in which we introduce a model parameterizing the underlying stellar and core-collapse physics and obtaining the remnant black hole distribution as a derived by-product. In doing so, we constrain the stellar physics necessary to explain the astrophysical distribution of black hole properties under a given model. We apply this to the mapping between initial mass and remnant black hole mass, accounting for mass-dependent mass loss using a simple parameterized description. Allowing the parameters of the initial mass–remnant mass relationship to evolve with redshift permits correlated and physically reasonable changes to features in the mass function. We find that the current data are consistent with no redshift evolution in the core–remnant mass relationship, but place only weak constraints on the change of these parameters. This procedure can be applied to modeling any physical process underlying the astrophysical distribution. We illustrate this by applying our model to the pulsational pair instability supernova (PPISN) process, previously proposed as an explanation for the observed excess of black holes at ∼35 M⊙. Placing constraints on the reaction rates necessary to explain the PPISN parameters, we concur with previous results in the literature that the peak observed at ∼35 M⊙ is unlikely to be a signature from the PPISN process as presently understood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑洞天体物理群体的物理模型:引力波源质量分布凹凸的应用
对双黑洞的引力波观测揭示了黑洞质量分布中意想不到的结构。以往的研究采用物理动因的现象学模型,并推断出控制其模型所允许的质量分布特征的参数,将对这些参数的约束与它们的物理动因联系起来。在这项工作中,我们采用了另一种方法,即引入一个模型,将基本的恒星和核心坍缩物理学参数化,并将残余黑洞分布作为衍生副产品。通过这种方法,我们对恒星物理学进行了必要的约束,以解释特定模型下黑洞性质的天体物理分布。我们将此应用于初始质量和残余黑洞质量之间的映射,利用简单的参数化描述来解释与质量相关的质量损失。允许初始质量-残余质量关系的参数随红移演化,可以使质量函数的特征发生相关的、物理上合理的变化。我们发现,目前的数据与核心-残留质量关系没有发生红移演变是一致的,但对这些参数的变化只施加了微弱的约束。这个过程可以应用于天体物理分布的任何物理过程建模。我们将模型应用于脉冲对不稳定性超新星(PPISN)过程来说明这一点,该过程之前被提出来解释观测到的∼35 M⊙黑洞过剩现象。我们对解释PPISN参数所需的反应速率施加了限制,我们同意之前文献中的结果,即在∼35 M⊙处观测到的峰值不太可能是目前所理解的PPISN过程的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expanding the Inventory of Molecule-rich Planetary Nebulae: New Observations of M4-17, Hu 1-1, M1-59, and Na 2 Whole-disk Sampling of Molecular Clouds in M83 Disk2Planet: A Robust and Automated Machine Learning Tool for Parameter Inference in Disk–Planet Systems A Search for Persistent Radio Sources toward Repeating Fast Radio Bursts Discovered by CHIME/FRB Constraining Quasar Feedback from Analysis of the Hydrostatic Equilibrium of the Molecular Gas in Their Host Galaxies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1