{"title":"The Taphonomy of Status: The Creation of Group Identity and Social Inequality in Medieval Croatia","authors":"Anna J. Osterholtz, Ivan Valent","doi":"10.1007/s10816-024-09671-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article focuses on the taphonomy of inequality visible in within-church burials from the site of the Church of St. George at Đurđevac-Sošice, a Medieval church in Northern Croatia. Building on concepts of Whitehead’s Poetics model, the three-body model, and landscape archaeology, we examine the role of church architecture in the development and affirmation of social inequality though burial practices. Burial within church spaces was typically limited to those of higher social status (relative to the rest of the community). Here we examine how those practices acted both as leveling acts that promoted group identity at the same time as they highlighted social inequality. This theoretical model is then used to understand more about the use of the Church of St. George at Đurđevac-Sošice as a burial location. The Church of St. George was used as a place of worship from twelfth until the beginning of the nineteenth century, and as a place of burial (as far as the current research has shown) between the twelfth and first half of the sixteenth century. During excavations in 2017–2019, 243 graves were identified, many of which were disturbed or incomplete due to subsequent burial activity during the use of the church as a burial location. These disturbances resulted in a large amount of comingled remains from within the fill of the recognized graves, as well as from levels which resulted from overlapping of younger burial fills over older ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":47725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-024-09671-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article focuses on the taphonomy of inequality visible in within-church burials from the site of the Church of St. George at Đurđevac-Sošice, a Medieval church in Northern Croatia. Building on concepts of Whitehead’s Poetics model, the three-body model, and landscape archaeology, we examine the role of church architecture in the development and affirmation of social inequality though burial practices. Burial within church spaces was typically limited to those of higher social status (relative to the rest of the community). Here we examine how those practices acted both as leveling acts that promoted group identity at the same time as they highlighted social inequality. This theoretical model is then used to understand more about the use of the Church of St. George at Đurđevac-Sošice as a burial location. The Church of St. George was used as a place of worship from twelfth until the beginning of the nineteenth century, and as a place of burial (as far as the current research has shown) between the twelfth and first half of the sixteenth century. During excavations in 2017–2019, 243 graves were identified, many of which were disturbed or incomplete due to subsequent burial activity during the use of the church as a burial location. These disturbances resulted in a large amount of comingled remains from within the fill of the recognized graves, as well as from levels which resulted from overlapping of younger burial fills over older ones.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, the leading journal in its field, presents original articles that address method- or theory-focused issues of current archaeological interest and represent significant explorations on the cutting edge of the discipline. The journal also welcomes topical syntheses that critically assess and integrate research on a specific subject in archaeological method or theory, as well as examinations of the history of archaeology. Written by experts, the articles benefit an international audience of archaeologists, students of archaeology, and practitioners of closely related disciplines. Specific topics covered in recent issues include: the use of nitche construction theory in archaeology, new developments in the use of soil chemistry in archaeological interpretation, and a model for the prehistoric development of clothing. The Journal''s distinguished Editorial Board includes archaeologists with worldwide archaeological knowledge (the Americas, Asia and the Pacific, Europe, and Africa), and expertise in a wide range of methodological and theoretical issues. Rated ''A'' in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH) Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory is rated ''A'' in the ERIH, a new reference index that aims to help evenly access the scientific quality of Humanities research output. For more information visit: http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/activities/research-infrastructures.html Rated ''A'' in the Australian Research Council Humanities and Creative Arts Journal List. For more information, visit: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/journal_list_dev.htm