Re-infection after treatment for moderate and severe diabetic foot infections

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY International Wound Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/iwj.70123
Lawrence A. Lavery, Arthur N. Tarricone, Easton C. Ryan, Peter A. Crisologo, Matthew Malone, Mehmet A. Suludere, Lee C. Rogers, Dane K. Wukich
{"title":"Re-infection after treatment for moderate and severe diabetic foot infections","authors":"Lawrence A. Lavery,&nbsp;Arthur N. Tarricone,&nbsp;Easton C. Ryan,&nbsp;Peter A. Crisologo,&nbsp;Matthew Malone,&nbsp;Mehmet A. Suludere,&nbsp;Lee C. Rogers,&nbsp;Dane K. Wukich","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To investigate risk factors for re-infection and compare the outcomes in people with diabetic foot infections. A retrospective chart review was conducted, and 294 hospitalised patients with moderate to severe diabetic foot infections (DFIs) were analysed for this study. The diagnosis and classification of the severity of infection was based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) infection guidelines. Skin and soft tissue infections were diagnosed based on clinical observations as per IWGDF classification in addition to ruling out any suspected osteomyelitis (OM) through negative bone culture, MRI or WBC SPECT CT. OM was confirmed by bone culture or histopathology. Clinical outcomes were based on a 12-month follow-up period. All dichotomous outcomes were compared using <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> with an alpha of 0.05. The result of this study shows a 48% rate of re-infection in people admitted to our hospital with moderate and severe diabetic foot infections (DFI). Patients with osteomyelitis present during the index admission were 2.1 times more likely to experience a re-infection than patients with soft tissue infection (56.7% vs. 38.0% respectively). In the univariate analysis, risk factors for re-infection included osteomyelitis, non-healing wounds, prolonged wound healing, antidepressants and leukocytosis. In the regression analysis, the only risk factor for re-infection was wounds that were not healed &gt;90 days (HR =2.0, CI: 1.5, 2.7, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Re-infection is very common in patients with moderate and severe diabetic foot infections. Risk factors include osteomyelitis, non-healing wound, prolonged wound healing, antidepressants and leukocytosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"21 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate risk factors for re-infection and compare the outcomes in people with diabetic foot infections. A retrospective chart review was conducted, and 294 hospitalised patients with moderate to severe diabetic foot infections (DFIs) were analysed for this study. The diagnosis and classification of the severity of infection was based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) infection guidelines. Skin and soft tissue infections were diagnosed based on clinical observations as per IWGDF classification in addition to ruling out any suspected osteomyelitis (OM) through negative bone culture, MRI or WBC SPECT CT. OM was confirmed by bone culture or histopathology. Clinical outcomes were based on a 12-month follow-up period. All dichotomous outcomes were compared using χ2 with an alpha of 0.05. The result of this study shows a 48% rate of re-infection in people admitted to our hospital with moderate and severe diabetic foot infections (DFI). Patients with osteomyelitis present during the index admission were 2.1 times more likely to experience a re-infection than patients with soft tissue infection (56.7% vs. 38.0% respectively). In the univariate analysis, risk factors for re-infection included osteomyelitis, non-healing wounds, prolonged wound healing, antidepressants and leukocytosis. In the regression analysis, the only risk factor for re-infection was wounds that were not healed >90 days (HR =2.0, CI: 1.5, 2.7, p = 0.001). Re-infection is very common in patients with moderate and severe diabetic foot infections. Risk factors include osteomyelitis, non-healing wound, prolonged wound healing, antidepressants and leukocytosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中度和重度糖尿病足感染治疗后的再次感染
调查糖尿病足感染患者再次感染的风险因素并比较其结果。本研究对 294 名患有中度至重度糖尿病足感染(DFIs)的住院患者进行了回顾性病历分析。感染严重程度的诊断和分类以国际糖尿病足工作组(IWGDF)感染指南为基础。皮肤和软组织感染的诊断依据是 IWGDF 分类的临床观察结果,以及通过阴性骨培养、核磁共振成像或白细胞 SPECT CT 排除任何疑似骨髓炎(OM)。骨髓炎通过骨培养或组织病理学证实。临床结果以 12 个月的随访期为基础。所有二分法结果均采用χ2进行比较,α值为0.05。研究结果显示,本院收治的中度和重度糖尿病足感染(DFI)患者的再感染率为 48%。入院时患有骨髓炎的患者再次感染的几率是软组织感染患者的 2.1 倍(分别为 56.7% 和 38.0%)。在单变量分析中,再次感染的风险因素包括骨髓炎、伤口不愈合、伤口愈合时间延长、抗抑郁药和白细胞增多。在回归分析中,再次感染的唯一风险因素是伤口 90 天未愈合(HR =2.0,CI:1.5,2.7,P =0.001)。再感染在中度和重度糖尿病足感染患者中非常常见。风险因素包括骨髓炎、伤口不愈合、伤口愈合时间过长、抗抑郁药和白细胞增多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
期刊最新文献
Skin graft monitoring using forward-looking infrared thermal imaging Comparing the efficacy of Zinc Oxide versus Vaseline prophylactic dressings in preventing sacral pressure injuries in patients admitted to the intensive care unit Clinical nurses' attitudes towards medical device-related pressure injuries and an analysis of relevant influencing factors: A cross-sectional study in China Non-invasive techniques for wound assessment: A comprehensive review Determining the frequency of pressure ulcers incidence and associated risk factors in critical care patients: A 3-year retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1