Implications of Pea–Barley-Mixed Cropping on Gross Margin, Root Rot Infestation, and Nitrogen Supply—A Swiss Case Study

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Legume Science Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1002/leg3.70014
Seraina Vonzun, Michael Schneider, Valentin Gfeller, Pierre Hohmann, Benedikt Haug, Matthias Meyer, Monika M. Messmer
{"title":"Implications of Pea–Barley-Mixed Cropping on Gross Margin, Root Rot Infestation, and Nitrogen Supply—A Swiss Case Study","authors":"Seraina Vonzun,&nbsp;Michael Schneider,&nbsp;Valentin Gfeller,&nbsp;Pierre Hohmann,&nbsp;Benedikt Haug,&nbsp;Matthias Meyer,&nbsp;Monika M. Messmer","doi":"10.1002/leg3.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A growing demand for plant-based proteins and renewable nitrogen supplies has necessitated an intensification of legume cultivation in Europe. However, the cultivation of grain legumes is inherently exposed to various risks, including lodging and fungal infections. Mixed cropping of pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.) and barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.) presents a promising approach to increase plant-based protein production while also improving yield stability. We performed a multi-environment-mixed cropping comparison with pure pea and pure barley to determine the effects of the cultivation method on root rot resistance, N supply in successive crops, grain yield, and economic performance. While the economic performance was similar for pure pea and mixed cropping, we observed a lower variability of the farmer's gross margin in mixed cropping compared with pure cropping across 3 years and two locations. Especially in seasons with high precipitation, the mixed cropping approach prevented lodging and harvest losses. The N supply in the successive crop was equal or higher in mixed cropping compared with pure pea cropping. No variation in the pea root rot infestation levels was observed between mixed and pure cropping, indicating a general demand for resistance breeding. Our experiment indicated genotype-specific effects on the gross margin in regard to culture (pure pea and mixed cropping). Leafy genotypes in particular demonstrate substantial performance gains when cultivated in mixed cropping systems. The conclusion is that mixed cropping leads to similarly positive crop rotation nitrogen effects as pure pea cropping, with the advantage of reduced gross margin and yield variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":17929,"journal":{"name":"Legume Science","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legume Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing demand for plant-based proteins and renewable nitrogen supplies has necessitated an intensification of legume cultivation in Europe. However, the cultivation of grain legumes is inherently exposed to various risks, including lodging and fungal infections. Mixed cropping of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) presents a promising approach to increase plant-based protein production while also improving yield stability. We performed a multi-environment-mixed cropping comparison with pure pea and pure barley to determine the effects of the cultivation method on root rot resistance, N supply in successive crops, grain yield, and economic performance. While the economic performance was similar for pure pea and mixed cropping, we observed a lower variability of the farmer's gross margin in mixed cropping compared with pure cropping across 3 years and two locations. Especially in seasons with high precipitation, the mixed cropping approach prevented lodging and harvest losses. The N supply in the successive crop was equal or higher in mixed cropping compared with pure pea cropping. No variation in the pea root rot infestation levels was observed between mixed and pure cropping, indicating a general demand for resistance breeding. Our experiment indicated genotype-specific effects on the gross margin in regard to culture (pure pea and mixed cropping). Leafy genotypes in particular demonstrate substantial performance gains when cultivated in mixed cropping systems. The conclusion is that mixed cropping leads to similarly positive crop rotation nitrogen effects as pure pea cropping, with the advantage of reduced gross margin and yield variability.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
豌豆-大麦混作对毛利、根腐病侵染和氮供应的影响--瑞士案例研究
由于对植物蛋白和可再生氮素供应的需求不断增长,欧洲必须加强豆科植物的种植。然而,谷物豆科植物的种植本身面临着各种风险,包括匍匐生长和真菌感染。豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)和大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)的混合种植是一种很有前景的方法,既能增加植物蛋白产量,又能提高产量稳定性。我们对纯豌豆和纯大麦进行了多环境混作比较,以确定栽培方法对根腐病抗性、连作氮供应、谷物产量和经济效益的影响。虽然纯豌豆和混合种植的经济效益相似,但我们观察到,与纯豌豆种植相比,混合种植的农民毛利率在三年和两个地点的变化幅度较小。特别是在降水较多的季节,混作方法可以防止结荚和收获损失。与纯豌豆种植相比,混合种植的连作氮供应量相同或更高。混合种植和纯种种植之间的豌豆根腐病侵染程度没有差异,这表明抗性育种具有普遍需求。我们的实验表明,基因型对种植(纯豌豆和混合种植)毛利率的影响是特定的。在混作系统中种植时,叶菜类基因型的表现尤其突出。我们的结论是,混合种植与纯豌豆种植一样,都能产生积极的轮作氮效应,但优势是毛利率和产量变异性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Legume Science
Legume Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Valorization of Pea Pod (Pisum sativum L.) Waste: Application as a Functional Ingredient in Flatbreads Nutritional, Antioxidant and Structural Properties of Rusk Developed From Wheat–Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranean) Flour Functional and Nutritional Characterization of a Natural Diet Based on BIO102 Iron Biofortified Beans in Newly Weaned Mice Implications of Pea–Barley-Mixed Cropping on Gross Margin, Root Rot Infestation, and Nitrogen Supply—A Swiss Case Study Structural and Pasting Properties of Lentil Starch: A Comprehensive Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1