Facilitators and barriers of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among four key populations in Iran.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11933-w
Hossein Moameri, Parvin Mangolian Shahrbabaki, Fatemeh Tavakoli, Parya Saberi, Ali Mirzazadeh, Reza Goudarzi, Hamid Sharifi
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among four key populations in Iran.","authors":"Hossein Moameri, Parvin Mangolian Shahrbabaki, Fatemeh Tavakoli, Parya Saberi, Ali Mirzazadeh, Reza Goudarzi, Hamid Sharifi","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11933-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) significantly reduces HIV transmission, but it is not commonly prescribed in Iran. Therefore, this study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to PrEP use among four key populations (KPs) in Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), and sexual partners of people living with HIV (PLHIV) to obtain deep insights into the participants' experiences, beliefs, and viewpoints. We included HIV experts, including staff from the HIV control department, healthcare providers with HIV experience, health policymakers, infectious disease specialists, and university professors. We performed a content analysis to identify facilitators and barriers to PrEP implementation among KPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed seven FSW, seven MSM, four PWID, four sexual partners of PLHIV, and 18 HIV experts. The facilitator's theme emerged in four main categories, including eight different factors: 1) Individual and interpersonal factors (motivations, fear of testing positive for HIV, and safety nets and financial support), 2) Age and sex differences, 3) Organizational factors (appropriate PrEP distribution, information sharing, and receipt of high-quality services, 4) Efficacy of PrEP. The barrier's theme emerged in three main categories, including four factors: 1) Individual factors (insufficient knowledge and awareness, and fragile trust), 2) Cultural barriers, and 3) Organizational factors (inadequate infrastructure and organizational barriers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified key facilitators and barriers to successful PrEP implementation among KPs in Iran. By addressing these barriers, Iran has an opportunity to include PrEP programs in its HIV prevention efforts for KPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11933-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) significantly reduces HIV transmission, but it is not commonly prescribed in Iran. Therefore, this study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to PrEP use among four key populations (KPs) in Iran.

Methods: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), and sexual partners of people living with HIV (PLHIV) to obtain deep insights into the participants' experiences, beliefs, and viewpoints. We included HIV experts, including staff from the HIV control department, healthcare providers with HIV experience, health policymakers, infectious disease specialists, and university professors. We performed a content analysis to identify facilitators and barriers to PrEP implementation among KPs.

Results: We interviewed seven FSW, seven MSM, four PWID, four sexual partners of PLHIV, and 18 HIV experts. The facilitator's theme emerged in four main categories, including eight different factors: 1) Individual and interpersonal factors (motivations, fear of testing positive for HIV, and safety nets and financial support), 2) Age and sex differences, 3) Organizational factors (appropriate PrEP distribution, information sharing, and receipt of high-quality services, 4) Efficacy of PrEP. The barrier's theme emerged in three main categories, including four factors: 1) Individual factors (insufficient knowledge and awareness, and fragile trust), 2) Cultural barriers, and 3) Organizational factors (inadequate infrastructure and organizational barriers).

Conclusions: We identified key facilitators and barriers to successful PrEP implementation among KPs in Iran. By addressing these barriers, Iran has an opportunity to include PrEP programs in its HIV prevention efforts for KPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗四类重点人群使用艾滋病暴露前预防措施的促进因素和障碍。
背景:暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)可显著减少艾滋病病毒的传播,但在伊朗,这种疗法并不常见。因此,本研究旨在确定伊朗四类关键人群(KPs)使用 PrEP 的促进因素和障碍:我们对女性性工作者 (FSW)、男男性行为者 (MSM)、注射毒品者 (PWID) 以及 HIV 感染者 (PLHIV) 的性伴侣进行了深入的定性访谈,以深入了解参与者的经历、信仰和观点。我们的参与者包括艾滋病专家,包括艾滋病控制部门的工作人员、具有艾滋病防治经验的医疗服务提供者、卫生政策制定者、传染病专家和大学教授。我们进行了内容分析,以确定在 KPs 中实施 PrEP 的促进因素和障碍:我们采访了 7 名家庭主妇、7 名男男性行为者、4 名艾滋病感染者、4 名艾滋病毒携带者的性伴侣和 18 名艾滋病专家。促进因素主题分为四大类,包括八个不同的因素:1) 个人和人际因素(动机、对 HIV 检测呈阳性的恐惧、安全网和经济支持);2) 年龄和性别差异;3) 组织因素(PrEP 的适当分发、信息共享和接受优质服务;4) PrEP 的功效。障碍主题分为三大类,包括四个因素:1) 个人因素(知识和意识不足、信任脆弱),2) 文化障碍,3) 组织因素(基础设施不足和组织障碍):我们确定了在伊朗 KPs 中成功实施 PrEP 的主要促进因素和障碍。通过解决这些障碍,伊朗有机会将 PrEP 计划纳入其针对 KPs 的艾滋病预防工作中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Decarbonizing surgical care: a qualitative systematic review guided by the Congruence Model. Qualitative exploration of 3D printing in Swedish healthcare: perceived effects and barriers. A tailored intervention for the detection of patients with coronary heart disease and mental or cognitive comorbidities in the German primary care setting: qualitative evaluation of implementation success. Breaking barriers: a qualitative exploration of healthcare access for crack cocaine users in Limerick. Intention to use mobile text message reminders for medication adherence among hypertensive patients in North West Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1