What do we know about parental embodied mentalizing? A systematic review of the construct, assessment, empirical findings, gaps and further steps.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Attachment & Human Development Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1080/14616734.2024.2421432
Aylin Aras, Peter Fonagy, Chloe Campbell, Camilla Rosan
{"title":"What do we know about parental embodied mentalizing? A systematic review of the construct, assessment, empirical findings, gaps and further steps.","authors":"Aylin Aras, Peter Fonagy, Chloe Campbell, Camilla Rosan","doi":"10.1080/14616734.2024.2421432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Before the maturation of higher-order cognitive functions, infants primarily communicate via bodily expressions. Their behavior adjustments are also shaped by caregiver reactions, which differ in timing, intensity, and nature. Although mentalizing, or reflective functioning, is thought to influence caregiver interactions, the literature has largely focused on mentalizing as an explicit, cognitive process. Given the inherently embodied nature of early parent-infant exchanges, this emphasis left a clear gap in capturing the implicit facets of parental mentalizing. Addressing this, the concept of \"parental embodied mentalizing\" (PEM) was developed, which pertains to a caregiver's implicit capacity to discern and respond to an infant's emotional states, thoughts, and intents through bodily movements, gauged via real-time, shared, kinesthetic interplays. This systematic narrative review explores the PEM construct, scrutinizing its theoretical foundations and empirical basis. We aggregate insights from relevant studies, review the current research landscape's strengths and limitations, and pinpoint areas ripe for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8632,"journal":{"name":"Attachment & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":"1-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attachment & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2024.2421432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Before the maturation of higher-order cognitive functions, infants primarily communicate via bodily expressions. Their behavior adjustments are also shaped by caregiver reactions, which differ in timing, intensity, and nature. Although mentalizing, or reflective functioning, is thought to influence caregiver interactions, the literature has largely focused on mentalizing as an explicit, cognitive process. Given the inherently embodied nature of early parent-infant exchanges, this emphasis left a clear gap in capturing the implicit facets of parental mentalizing. Addressing this, the concept of "parental embodied mentalizing" (PEM) was developed, which pertains to a caregiver's implicit capacity to discern and respond to an infant's emotional states, thoughts, and intents through bodily movements, gauged via real-time, shared, kinesthetic interplays. This systematic narrative review explores the PEM construct, scrutinizing its theoretical foundations and empirical basis. We aggregate insights from relevant studies, review the current research landscape's strengths and limitations, and pinpoint areas ripe for further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们对父母的具身心理化了解多少?对构建、评估、实证研究结果、差距和进一步措施的系统回顾。
在高阶认知功能成熟之前,婴儿主要通过身体表情进行交流。他们的行为调整也受照料者反应的影响,而照料者反应的时间、强度和性质各不相同。尽管心智化或反思功能被认为会影响照料者之间的互动,但文献主要侧重于将心智化作为一种明确的认知过程。考虑到早期亲子交流的内在本质,这一重点在捕捉父母心智化的内隐方面留下了明显的空白。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了 "父母内隐心智化"(PEM)的概念,它指的是看护者通过身体动作,通过实时、共享、动觉的相互作用,对婴儿的情绪状态、想法和意图进行辨别和回应的内隐能力。这篇系统性叙事综述探讨了 PEM 这一概念,仔细研究了它的理论基础和实证依据。我们汇总了相关研究的见解,回顾了当前研究的优势和局限,并指出了有待进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Attachment & Human Development
Attachment & Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Attachment & Human Development is the leading forum for the presentation of empirical research, reviews and clinical case studies that reflect contemporary advances in attachment theory and research. The journal addresses the growing demand from the domains of psychology, psychiatry, psychotherapy and related disciplines including nursing and social work, for a clear presentation of ideas, methods and research based on attachment theory.
期刊最新文献
What do we know about parental embodied mentalizing? A systematic review of the construct, assessment, empirical findings, gaps and further steps. Enhancing visitation in the child welfare system for children separated from their birth parents: pilot results of fostering relationships. Mary Main's concept of conditional strategies: influences on studies of child-parent and adult romantic attachments. The legacy of Mary Main in attachment and developmental research in Israel. The role of childhood trauma and attachment state of mind in mothers' birth experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1