Different associations of atherogenic index of plasma, triglyceride glucose index, and hemoglobin A1C levels with the risk of coronary artery calcification progression according to established diabetes.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Diabetology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s12933-024-02508-4
Ki-Bum Won, Su-Yeon Choi, Eun Ju Chun, Sung Hak Park, Jidong Sung, Hae Ok Jung, Hyuk-Jae Chang
{"title":"Different associations of atherogenic index of plasma, triglyceride glucose index, and hemoglobin A1C levels with the risk of coronary artery calcification progression according to established diabetes.","authors":"Ki-Bum Won, Su-Yeon Choi, Eun Ju Chun, Sung Hak Park, Jidong Sung, Hae Ok Jung, Hyuk-Jae Chang","doi":"10.1186/s12933-024-02508-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both insulin resistance and hyperglycemia are important risk factors for atherosclerosis. While the characteristics of atherosclerosis are obviously different according to established diabetes, little has been known regarding the risk of coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression related to the biomarkers of atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), triglyceride glucose (TyG) index, and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) in conditions with and without diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 12,326 asymptomatic Korean adults (mean age 51.7 ± 8.5 years; 84.2% males; 15.8% with diabetes) over a median follow-up period of 3.0 years. AIP was defined as the base-10 logarithm of the ratio of triglyceride concentration (mmol/L) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L). The TyG index was calculated as ln (fasting triglycerides [mg/dL] × fasting glucose [mg/ dL]/2). CAC progression was defined using the SQRT method, as a difference of ≥ 2.5 between the square roots (√) of baseline and follow-up coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) (Δ√transformed CACS). Logistic regression models adjusted for interscan periods were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The levels of AIP, TyG index, and HbA1C were significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetics. CAC progression was more frequently observed in diabetics (46.9%) than in non-diabetics (28.0%). After adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, current smoking status, serum creatinine levels, baseline CACS, and interscan period, AIP (per-0.1 unit increase) was associated with CAC progression in only non-diabetics (OR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 - 1.06; P < 0.001). In contrast, HbA1C level (per-1% increase) was significantly associated with CAC progression in only diabetics (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08 - 1.32; P = 0.001). The TyG index (per-1 unit increase) was associated with CAC progression in both non-diabetics (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.19 - 1.46; P < 0.001) and diabetics (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10 - 1.60; P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The associations between AIP, TyG index, and HbA1C levels with CAC progression vary according to established diabetes. Of these biomarkers, TyG index is independently associated with CAC progression irrespective of established diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"23 1","pages":"418"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02508-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both insulin resistance and hyperglycemia are important risk factors for atherosclerosis. While the characteristics of atherosclerosis are obviously different according to established diabetes, little has been known regarding the risk of coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression related to the biomarkers of atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), triglyceride glucose (TyG) index, and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) in conditions with and without diabetes.

Methods: We analyzed 12,326 asymptomatic Korean adults (mean age 51.7 ± 8.5 years; 84.2% males; 15.8% with diabetes) over a median follow-up period of 3.0 years. AIP was defined as the base-10 logarithm of the ratio of triglyceride concentration (mmol/L) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L). The TyG index was calculated as ln (fasting triglycerides [mg/dL] × fasting glucose [mg/ dL]/2). CAC progression was defined using the SQRT method, as a difference of ≥ 2.5 between the square roots (√) of baseline and follow-up coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) (Δ√transformed CACS). Logistic regression models adjusted for interscan periods were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR).

Results: The levels of AIP, TyG index, and HbA1C were significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetics. CAC progression was more frequently observed in diabetics (46.9%) than in non-diabetics (28.0%). After adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, current smoking status, serum creatinine levels, baseline CACS, and interscan period, AIP (per-0.1 unit increase) was associated with CAC progression in only non-diabetics (OR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 - 1.06; P < 0.001). In contrast, HbA1C level (per-1% increase) was significantly associated with CAC progression in only diabetics (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08 - 1.32; P = 0.001). The TyG index (per-1 unit increase) was associated with CAC progression in both non-diabetics (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.19 - 1.46; P < 0.001) and diabetics (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10 - 1.60; P = 0.003).

Conclusions: The associations between AIP, TyG index, and HbA1C levels with CAC progression vary according to established diabetes. Of these biomarkers, TyG index is independently associated with CAC progression irrespective of established diabetes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数、甘油三酯血糖指数和血红蛋白 A1C 水平与冠状动脉钙化进展风险的不同关联。
背景:胰岛素抵抗和高血糖都是动脉粥样硬化的重要危险因素。虽然动脉粥样硬化的特征因糖尿病的不同而明显不同,但对于有糖尿病和无糖尿病情况下冠状动脉钙化(CAC)进展的风险与血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)、甘油三酯血糖(TyG)指数和血红蛋白 A1C(HbA1C)等生物标志物的关系却知之甚少:我们对 12,326 名无症状的韩国成年人(平均年龄为 51.7 ± 8.5 岁;84.2% 为男性;15.8% 患有糖尿病)进行了分析,随访时间中位数为 3.0 年。AIP定义为甘油三酯浓度(毫摩尔/升)与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(毫摩尔/升)之比的基10对数。TyG指数的计算公式为ln(空腹甘油三酯[mg/dL] × 空腹血糖[mg/dL]/2)。CAC进展采用SQRT法定义,即基线和随访冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)的平方根(√)之差≥2.5(Δ√转换后的CACS)。采用调整扫描间期的逻辑回归模型估算几率比(OR):结果:糖尿病患者的 AIP、TyG 指数和 HbA1C 水平明显高于非糖尿病患者。糖尿病患者的 CAC 进展率(46.9%)高于非糖尿病患者(28.0%)。在对年龄、性别、高血压、高脂血症、肥胖、当前吸烟状况、血清肌酐水平、基线 CACS 和扫描间期进行调整后,只有非糖尿病患者的 AIP(每增加 0.1 个单位)与 CAC 进展相关(OR:1.04,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.02 - 1.06;OR:1.02 - 1.06,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.02 - 1.06):1.02 - 1.06;P 结论:AIP、TyG 指数和 HbA1C 水平与 CAC 进展之间的关系因糖尿病患者而异。在这些生物标志物中,TyG 指数与 CAC 进展独立相关,与已确诊的糖尿病无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
期刊最新文献
The effects of Dapagliflozin in a real-world population of HFrEF patients with different hemodynamic profiles: worse is better. Combined impact of prediabetes and hepatic steatosis on cardiometabolic outcomes in young adults. Pathways from insulin resistance to incident cardiovascular disease: a Bayesian network analysis. SGLT2-inhibitors in diabetic patients with severe aortic stenosis and cardiac damage undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Lipoxin A4 improves cardiac remodeling and function in diabetes-associated cardiac dysfunction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1